关于我国研究型大学院长职业化的研究

上海交通大学硕士学位论文关于我国研究型大学院长职业化的研究姓名：张雪珍申请学位级别：硕士专业：高等教育学指导教师：赵文华20070101IS26150MITTexasYorkIllinoisIIASTUDYOFPROFESSIONALIZATIONOFACADEMICDEANSINCHINESERESEARCHUNIVERSITIESABSTRACTWiththedeepeningreformationofcollegeasanentityinChineseresearchuniversities,academicdeans,whoholdtheprimaryresponsibilitiesofschoolteaching,researchandadministrationaffairs,willbecomethekeypersonstoimplementtheuniversities’developmentstrategies,variousoftasksandobjectivesofrunninguniversities.However,accordingtorecentresearchonmodernuniversitysystem,wenoticethatfewresearchersrealizetheimportanceoftherolesandresponsibilitiesofacademicdeansinresearchuniversities.Instead,mostofthemfocushighlyontheissuesconcerningPartycommittees,presidents,teachers,universityoffices,logisticsetc.Thisdissertation,basedonthetheoriesofprofessionalizationofuniversityadministrators,professionalizationofuniversitypresidents,professionalmanagersinenterprise,humanresourcesmanagement,leadershipmanagement,setsforththeconnotationanddefinitionofprofessionalizationofacademicdeansfromthreeanglesofuniversitymanagementmechanism,deans’rolesorientation,transformationprocessofdeans’roles,andsumsupwithsixcharacteristicsofprofessionalizationofacademicdeans,whichconcludeassole-duty-oriented,stability-oriented,professional-oriented,standardization-oriented,academy-orientedetc.Atthesametime,itanalyzesandsortsouttheeasilyconfusingdefinitionofprofessionalizationindifferentrelateddocuments.InordertogetsomeideasonthecurrentsituationofacademicdeansinChineseresearchuniversities,theauthorofthisdissertationconductedasurveyof26academicdeansand150professorsinSresearchuniversity,andinterviewedsomeexpertsontheseissuesintheirrelatedfields.Throughthequestionnaireandtheinterview,theauthorfoundthefollowingproblemspreventingChineseacademicIIIdeansfrombeingprofessional:1)Thewaysofappointingacademicdeansaresimplistic;2)Thetimeandenergythedeansspentinmanagingtheirschoolsareverylimited;3)ThestimulatingandrestrainingsystemofacademicdeansarelackofinChina;4)There’snosystematictrainingforacademicdeans;5)Themanagementabilitiesofacademicdeansneedtofurtherimprovedetc.ForthesakeofcomparingthestatusofChineseacademicdeanswiththatinAmericanworld-classresearchuniversities,thisdissertationcollectsagreatdealoffirsthandinformationofthoseuniversitiesandstudiesthefeaturesofthemodeofprofessionalzationofAmericanacademicdeans.Andthroughthecasestudyofselectionprocedure,rolesandresponsibilities,evaluationandtrainingofthedeansinMIT,TexasUniversity,YorkuniversityandIllinoisUniversity,itanalyzesthemechanismofprofessionalizationofacademicdeansinAmericanresearchuniversities.Toconclude,theauthorputsforwardsomesuggestionsonhowtoimplementtheprofessionalizationofacademicdeansinChineseresearchuniversitiesintermsofthecurrentsituationinChina.Thesesuggestionsconsistofthefollowingparts:Acknowledgetheidentityofprofessionalacademicdeans;Clarifythequalificationofprofessionalacademicdeans;Standardizetheselectionprocedureofprofessionalacademicdeans;Clearlydefinetherolesandresponsibilitiesofprofessionalacademicdeans;Establishadesirableevaluationandsalarysystemforprofessionalacademicdeans;Setupasystematictrainingsystemforprofessionalacademicdeans;Buildaneffectivesupervisionandsecuritysystemforprofessionalacademicdeans;Formacirculatingsystemforprofessionalacademicdeansetc.KeyWords:Researchuniversity,modernuniversitysystem,collegeasanentity,professionalizationofacademicdeans2007119200119200711911.1“”2“”“”“”20053CEO120%120%100%200611——.200532006931.21.2.1“”“”“”“”“”.2006,1241.2.2“”“”“”“”S“”1.31.3.1123S26150.1.3.2“”“”562.12.1.1SamuelP.Huntingtonvocationprofession“theprofessionalman”1“”2SamuelP.Huntington.TheSoldierandtheState:TheTheoryandPoliticsofCivil-militaryRelationsCambridge:TheBelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress1957:810.7“”3“”HowardM.VollmerandDonaldL.MillsProfessionalization123451professionoccupationprofessionprofession2professionalismprofessionalization20026HowardM.VollmerandDonaldL.Millseds..ProfessionalizationEnglewoodCliffs:Prentice-HallInc.1966:9.2004282.1.2“”2.1.3180%100%2510320031094562.1.41“”“”23104“”“”2.22.2.1118101876.20702-119941253%20002612-1Table2-1DifferentDefinitionsofResearchUniversitiesbyDomesticandOverseasScharlorsandInstitutions.1550310TheBoyerCommissiononEducatingUndergraduatesintheResearchUniversity,ReinventingUndergraduateEducation:AblueprintforAmerican’sResearchUniversities,1998.LeeS.Shulman,TheCarnegieClassificationofInstitutionsofHigherEducation,theCarnegieFoundationfortheAdvancementofTeaching2000.200312112-11.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.20%-25%70%50%220013——20031200420036,19966——199722004,1127O80,:,2004,9,,2005,3——2000620037132.2.2“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”,,,,,1998,5,,,1995,3,,,2001,1,,,1998,6,,,1999,3,——19981“”——[]14“”“”“”“”2.2.3“”2005152.2.4“”“”“”“”6171312“”41.9%“”41%62.5%“”3/5“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“””“”“”“”19954——200020031199541998120003162.2.52.32.3.120045[]20041752.3.220046200421999320025200422005318——:“‘’”“”“”“”“”:;;20041200310:200424200422003320031020042192.3.3“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“20031151“”20035[]2004[]200220”“”“”2.3.411999122122