搜索
[]2008-06-30[](1973-),,,,[]2007,(,730070)[],,,,U:U,,2002;U,,,,,UU,,,[]U;;;[]F08:G402054[]A[]100220209(2009)0220092207,,19782006,GDP36451221087110,57185,,,,,619906126,20068104,??19992005,U,29()20092(212),U,U(Kuznets)U,U1955,KuzenetsU,[1]:,,U,,Robinson(Robinsoncurve),U[2],AdelmanMorris43U[3](P281-322)2070[4][5]ChenerySyrquin55,40%,20%,300[6](P105-138)PapanekKyn,[7]Barro84U[8],U,[9]Fei,[10](P75-93)DeiningerSquire108,90%U[11]Li,SquireZou,,[12]U,LeipzigerLewis19GNP500LDCs()19GNP500LDCs,U[13]Ram,,,,,[14]UGregorioLeeU,,412[15],,,,1991,,U[16],Robinson,,,,U[17]2001,19951998U,[18],,[19],2000,U[20]1996-2002,,,[21]39,U[22]1978-2004,,GDPGDP,U[23],,,UU,:,()(),[24],U1982-2000,U,,U,[25],,,UU,UU,,Ram,[14],,U??1999-2005,:U,,,,,,[26]31,,,,,,1999-20057,GDP;,,6()U1.U,,:YEQ=0+1lnG+2(lnG)2+(1)YEQ,lnGGDP(),49()20092(212),,:Yit=0+1LnRJGDPit+2(LnRJGDPit)2+3D1+4D2+1Yeari+it(2)(2),Yit:t;RJGDPit:GDP;D:,,D1,1,,0;D2,1,,0:,11;,,12;Yeari,1999,20002005,,,2.,OLS,1,GDPGDP,;,U,,,,,,,2002,U,28831175068214,2006GDP16084,U,,1:(Yt)GDP(LnRRJGDPt)0126701065GDP(LnRRJGDP1)-01013-01003()-0102033-01010(1999)Year2000010123Year200101022333Year200201073333Year200301055333Year200401050333Year200501056333-1106533-0176AdjustedR20108101469N211211:3011,330105,3330101()U1.(1997):Yi=0+1X2i+2Xi+(3)Yi,Xi,:59Yit=0+1ATTAINit+2(ATTAINit)2+3Yi(t-1)+it(4)(4),Yit:t;Yi(t-1):;ATTAINit):2.,(4)OLS,2,,,U,,,,,,,U,715815,,20058104,U,,2(Yt):(ATTAINit)0101501017(ATTAIN2it)-01001-01001(Yi(t-1))015483330119433301064AdjustedR20103901353N211179:3011,330105,3330101,:,U1999-2005,OLS,,GDPGDP,:,,2002,,U,,UU,,,,,,;,1995-2005GDP(3),,,,U3GDP199519961997199819992000200220032004200501679016630163701630016390165701656016260165701709:0101:69()20092(212),GDP,U,100,60-70,,[27](P60-61),[28],U,,,[29],U,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,U,,,,,,,,,,,[][1]KUZNETSS.Economicgrowthandincomeinequality[J].AmericanEconomicReview,1955,(45):1-28.[2]ROBINSONS.AnoteontheU-hypothesisrelatingincomeinequalityandeconomicdevelopment[J].Amer2icanEconomicReview,1976,66(3):437-440.[3]ADELMANI,MORRISCT.EconomicGrowthandSocialEquityinDevelopingCountries[M].California:StanfordUniversityPress,1973.[4]AHLUWALIAM.Incomedistributionanddevelop2ment[J].AmericanEconomicReview,1976,66(5):128135.[5]AHLUWALIAM.Inequality,povertyanddevelop2ment[J].JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,1976,(3):307342.[6]CHENERYH,SYRQUINM.PatternofDevelopment(1950-1970)[M].OxfordUniversityPress,1975.[7]PAPANEKG,KYNO.Theeffectonincomedistribu2tionofdevelopment,thegrowthrateandeconomicstrategy[J].JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,1986,23(1):5565.[8]BARRORJ.Inequalityandgrowthinapanelofcoun2tries[J].JournalofEconomicGrowth,2000,(5):5-32.[9]ANANDS,KANBURSM.TheKuznetsprocessandtheinequality-developmentrelationship[J].JournalofDevelopmentEconomics,1993,(40):2572.[10]FEIJ,GUSTAVR,SHIRLEYW.GrowthwithE2quality:TheTaiwanCase[M].OxfordUniversity:NewYork,1979.[11]DEININGERK,SQUIREL.Newdatasetmeasuringincomeinequality[J].WorldBankEconomicReview,1996,(10):565591.[12]LIH,SQUIREL,ZOUH.Explaininginternationalandintertemporalvariationsinincomeinequality[J].E2conomicJournal,1998,(108):2643.[13]LEIPZIGERDM,LEWISM.Socialindicators,growthanddistribution[J].WorldDevelopment,1980,8(4):299-302.[14]RAMR.Educationexpansionandschoolinginequali2ty:internationalevidenceandsomeimplications[J].Re2viewofEconomicsandStatistics,1990,72(2):266-274.[15]GREGORIOJD,LEEJ.Educationandincomeine2quality:newevidencefromcross-countrydata[J].Re279viewofIncomeandWealth,2002,48(3):395-416.[16],,.[J].(),1994,(9).[17].U?[J].,2000,(7).[18],.U[J].,2003,(2).[19],.[J].,2004,(3).[20].[J].,2005,(2).[21],.[J].,2005,(10).[22],,.:[J].,2005,(4).[23],.[J].,2006,(6).[24].[J].,1997,(10).[25].:[J].,2004,(6).[26]ATKINSONAB,BRANDOLINIA.Promiseandpit2fallsintheuseofsecondarydata-sets:incomedistri2butioninOECDcountriesasacasestudy[J].JournalofEconomicLiterature,2001,39(3):771-799.[27],.[M].:,1999.[28],.[J].,2005,(7).[29].U[J].,2002,(2).()EconomicGrowth,EducationalExpansionandIncomeDistribution:VerificationofTwoHypothesesofInverted-USUNBai-cai(ResearchCenterfortheEducationalDevelopmentofNorthwestMinorities,NorthwestNormalUniversity,Lanzhou730070,China)Abstract:Thereformandopening-uppolicyhasfacilitatedrapidnation-wideeconomicgrowthandeducationalexpan2sion.However,theresidentsincomegaphaswidenedupalongtheyears.Itwouldbemuchbettertomaketheincomedis2tributionpolicyiftherelationshipbetweeneconomicgrowth,educationalexpansionandincomedistribution,andthelawoftheresidentsincomedistributionchangearetakenintoaccount.Thepresentpaper,accordingly,makesanempiricalanaly2sis,andthediscussionshowsthatthereisaninvertedUrelationshipbetweeneconomicgrowthandincomedistribution.Thatis,theincomegapinChinahasbeenwideningupinanoverallscale;buttherehavebeensomedecreasingtrendssince2002.Nevertheless,theinvertedUrelationshipbetweentheeducationalexpansionandincomedistributionhasnotbeenfullyverified.ThefactthatthecorrelationcoefficientinbetweeniscomparativelyhighcouldexplainthehypothesesofthetwoinvertedU.Presently,the