海底管道安全状态评估技术综述

©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.:2008207223:(19642),,:100124500(2009)0120015206,,((),300452):DNV,,:;;:TE54:AAGENERALREVIEWOFSUBMARINEPIPELINESAFETYCONDITIONASSESSMENTTECHNIQUESZHANGJing2an,DONGXin2hong,HOULi2qun(CNOOCInspectionTechnology(Center)Co.Ltd,Tianjin300452,China)Abstract:Thispaperintroducesthecurrentinternalandexternalresearchstatusofsub2marinepipelinesafetyconditionassessmenttechniques.BasedonUSA,UKandDNVstand2ards,thepopularmethodsintheworldappliedtoaboveassessmentarementioned.Itishope2fulthatthesemethodscanbebenefittotheapplicationofsubmarinepipelinesafetyconditionassessmenttechniques.Keywords:submarinepipeline;safetyconditionassessment;defectassessment0(),138(3217km),,537,,,,,,,,(DNV),,,,©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.:1),,,GIS;2),,,,1122.1,DNV2RP2F101[1]ASMEB31G[2]PCORRC[3]ASMEB31G,X52;DNV2RP2F101,X652X80;PCORRCDNV2RP2F101,X522X70DNV2RP2F101DNV2RP2F101,:,DNVDNV2OS2F1012007;(ASD),,,,,61241©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[4]2DNV2RP2F10122.2,,,,:BS7910[5]SINTAP[6],,BS7910FAD,SINTAPFADCDF[7],FAD,BS7910BS7910:1)();2)();3)();4)()3:,;;,,,,,,333.1,,,711©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[8]1:Plx2PePb(t)mSC(1):Plx;Pe;Pb(t);m,SC,;Pb(t)23:Pb(t)=2tD2tfcb23(2)fcb=min(fy;fu1.15)(3):t;D;fcb,fy,fu,,;3.2,,[9]:a);b),,,,DNV2RP2F105[10],456:fn,ILILUc,100yearVILR,onsetD12L/D2501(4)81241©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.(5):…=Uc,100yearUw,1year+Uc,100year23(6):fn,IL;fn,CF;Uc,100year100;Uw,1year1;VILR,onset;VCFR,onset;IL,CF,50,,DNV2OS2F1012007[8](ULS),;,S2Nminer3.3:3.3.1,WFDFLFiFr78:FD+Fi2Fr2Wsin=0(7)N+FL2Wcos=0(8),,3.3.2:,,,,[11],,,,DNV3.3.3,,,2:DNV2RP2F109[12];LEVEL2DNV,,,,:1)54h,,;2)43h,;3);4),[11]DNV,,DNV911©1994-2010ChinaAcademicJournalElectronicPublishingHouse.Allrightsreserved.[13]DNV2RP2F110[14]3:1),;2),,,;3),DNV2RP2F110-3.5,,[15]DNV2OS2F1012007[8]3:1);2);3),;3),DNV2OS2F1012007,41/3,,,DNV,,DNV,[1]DNV.RecommendedPracticeRP2F101CorrodedPipelines[S].2004.[2]AmericanSocietyofMechanicalEngineers.ASMEB31G21991.ManualforDeterminingtheRemainingStrengthofCor2rodedPipelines[S].NewYork:ASMEB31Committee,1991.[3]AmericanSocietyofMechanicalEngineers.ASMEB31G21991.ManualforDeterminingtheRemainingStrengthofCor2rodedPipelines[S].NewYork:ASMEB31Committee,1991.[4],,.[J].,2006,26(11):1222125.[5]BritishStandardsInstitution.BS791022005,GuidetoMethodsforAssessingtheAcceptabilityofFlawsinMetallicStructures[S].2005.[6]SINTAP.StructureIntegrityAssessmentProcedureforEuropeanIndustryProjectBE9521426[S].FinalProcedure,BritishSteelReport,Rotherhan,1999.[7],,.SINTAPBS7910FAD[J].,2006,27(1):972100.[8]DNV.OffshoreStandardOS2F101SubmarinePipelineSystems[S].2007.[9],,.[J].(),2003,15(6):16218.[10]DNV.RecommendedPracticeRP2F105FreeSpanningPipelines[S].2006.[11]..[J].1998,10(5):123.[12]DNV.RecommendedPracticeRP2F109On2BottomStabilityDesignofSurmarinePipelines[S].2007.[13],,.[J].,2006,23(2):1732176.[14]DNV.RecommendedPracticeRP2F110GlobalBucklingofSubmarinePipelines[S].2007.[15],.[J].(),1994,6(6):1:5.,02241