多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索

24FLCJan.2009Vol.6No.1(GeneralSerialNo.27)PPTPPTR.Barthes1977(Rhetoricoftheimage)Kress,G.&vanLeeuwen,T.(1996;2001;2003)O’Halloran,K.L.(2004)Royce,T.(2002)“”(2007)(2003)E-mail:[e-mail];[e-mail]0-06A1672-9382(2009)01-0024-07(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)1125200916127(Martin,1992)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)PPT()3.13.2(1)(2)(3)(1)22331PPT*()26FLCJan.2009Vol.6No.1(GeneralSerialNo.27)4.1“”“”“”()(())(1)()(2)()(3)()4.2“”4427200916127PPTPPTPPT“”2Lim(2004)Halliday(3)55228FLCJan.2009Vol.6No.1(GeneralSerialNo.27)(Halliday,1973;1985)Kress&vanLeeuwen(1996)O’Toole(1994)O’Toole(1994)“”Peterwaskilledinatrafficaccident“Peterwaskilledinatrafficaccident.”Lim(2004)(member)(figure)(episode)(work)663292009161274Peterwasdeadbecauseofatrafficaccident()Peterwasbeingkilledinatrafficaccident()Peterwasexperiencingatrafficaccident()=4PPT“Peterwaskilledinatrafficaccident”,PPT(1)1////1PPT30FLCJan.2009Vol.6No.1(GeneralSerialNo.27)Peterwaskilledinatrafficaccidentonthehighwayintheeveningatahighspeed()*[1]O’Halloran,KayL.MultimodalDiscourseAnalysis:Systemic-FunctionalPerspectives[C].London:Continuum,2004.[2]Kress,G.LiteracyintheNewMediaAge[M].London:Routledge,2003.[3]Kress,G.andvanLeeuwen,T.ReadingImages:TheGrammarofVisualDesign[C].London:Routledge,1996.[4]Kress,G.&vanLeeuwen,T.MultimodalDiscourse:TheModesandMediaofContemporaryCommunication[C].London:Arnold,2001.[5]O’Toole,M.TheLanguageofDisplayedArt[M].London:LeicesterUniversityPress,1994.[6]Royce,T.MultimodalityintheTESOLclassroom:Exploringvisual-verbalsynergy[J].TESOLQUARTERLY,2002,36(2).191-205.[7]Halliday,M.A.K.ExplorationsintheFunctionsofLanguage[M].London:EdwardArnold,1973.[8]Halliday,M.A.K.&Hasan,R.Language,ContextandText:ASocialSemioticPerspective[M].Geelong,Vic.:DeakinUniversityPress,1985.[9]Halliday,M.A.K.&Matthiessen,C.M.I.M.IntroductiontoFunctionalGrammar[M].London:EdwardArnold,2004.[10]Halliday,M.A.K.&Matthiessen,C.M.I.M.ConstruingExperienceThroughMeaning:ALanguage-basedApproachtoCognition[M].London:Cassell,1999.[11]LimFei,V.Developinganintegrativemulti-semioticmodel[A].InO’Halloran,KayL.MultimodalDiscourseAnalysis:Systemic-FunctionalPerspectives[C].London:Continuum,2004:220-246.[12]Martin,J.R.EnglishText:SystemandStructure[M].Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins,1992.[13].[J].,2007(1).[14].[J].,2003(5).[15].[J].,2007(5).OnASyntheticTheoreticalFrameworkforMultimodalDiscourseAnalysisAbstract:Thepresentarticleisintendedtosetupatheoreticalframeworkformultimodaldiscourseanalysis.Itfirstgivesabriefsurveytostudiesonmultimodaldiscourseanalysis,andthensetsupasynthetictheoreticalframeworkformultimodaldiscourseanalysisonthebasisofsystemicfunctionallinguistics.Theframeworkmainlyconsistsofmultimodaldiscoursesystemsatfivelevels:(1)Thelevelofcontextofculture,(2)thelevelofcontextofsituation,(3)thesemanticlevel,(4)theformalleveland(5)thelevelofmedia(substance).Atthesametime,italsostudiestherelationshipbetweenthedifferentmodalities,includingbothcomplementaryrelationshipandnon-complementaryrelationship,andatlastitinvestigatestheestablishmentofgrammaticalsystemsfornon-linguisticmodalities,andthewaysthegrammaticalstructuresofdifferentmodalitiesrealizetheideational,interpersonalandtextualmeanings.KeyWords:multimodality;discourse;framework;grammar;relationship77