英文审稿意见

在比较高级别的会议、期刊等，评审系统中包括给编辑的和给作者的评审意见。本文就这两部分评审以及进行汇总第一部分：给作者的审稿意见1、目标和结果不清晰。ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。◆Ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.◆Furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：Theconclusionsareoverstated.Forexample,thestudydidnotshowifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio?7、对研究问题的定义：Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.10、严谨度问题：MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.11、格式（重视程度）：◆Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.IhaveattachedapdffilewithInstructionsforAuthorswhichshowsexamples.◆Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheInstructionsandFormsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见：◆ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.◆Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.◆Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.Thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.◆TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish.◆PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.?◆thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.来自编辑的鼓励：Encouragementfromreviewers:◆Iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbeeneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting.◆Thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitled……whichyousubmittedtotheJournalofBiomedicalMaterialsResearch:PartB-AppliedBiomaterials.◆TheSubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication.Thepaperisveryannoyingtoreadasitisriddledwithgrammaticalerrorsandpoorlyconstructedsentences.Furthermore,thenoveltyandmotivationoftheworkisnotwelljustified.Also,theexperimentalstudyisshallow.Infact,Icantfigureoutthelegendsasitistoosmall!Howdoesyoureffortcompareswithstate-of-the-art?Theexperimentisthemajorprobleminthepaper.Notonlythedatasetisnotpublished,butalsothedescriptionisveryrough.Itisimpossibletoreplicatetheexperimentandverifytheclaimoftheauthor.Furthermore,almostnodiscussionfortheexperimentalresultisgiven.E.g.whytheauthorwouldobtainthisresult?Whichcomponentisthemostimportant?Anyfurtherimprovement?theauthorshouldconcentratedonthenewalgorithmwithyourideaandexplaineditsadvantagesclearlywithamostsimplewords.itisgoodconcept,butneedtopolishlayout,language.Theauthorsdidagoodjobinmotivatingtheproblemstudiedintheintroduction.Themathematicexplanationoftheproposedsolutionsisalsonice.Furthermore,thepaperisaccompaniedbyanadequatesetofexperimentsforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofthesolutionstheauthorspropose.Apparently，Obviously,Innovation,refine,Inmyhumbleopinion如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病，一般你可以用youpaperhasbeenconditionallyaccepted.Pleaserevise.....accordingtoreviewcomments.如果是接受，你可以用Weareverypleasedtoinformyouthatyourpaperxxxxxhasbeenacceptedby[journalname].Pleaseprepareyourpaperbyjournaltemplate...............Atafirstglance,thisshortmanuscriptseemsaninterestingpieceofwork,reportingon×××.Fine,goodquality,butallthishasbeendoneandpublished,andnearlybecomeawell-knownphenomenon.Therefore,thereisinsufficientnoveltyorsignificancetomeetpublicationcriteria.Also,Ididnotseeanyexpermentalevidencehowthe**isrelatedwith**,exceptforthehand-wavingqualitativediscussion.Therefore,IcannotsupportitspublicationinJPDinitspresentform.Itshouldberejected.建议去小木虫问问，那里有一些资源。thejournal'scopyeditorsshouldnothavetofixthemanyremainingerrors.IsympathizethatChineselanguagesdonothaveanequivalentofEnglisharticles'a,an,the'anddon'tseemtograspthematerialmeaningofthosewords.Theauthor'sEnglishexpertdecidedtoinserttheword'the'infrontofmostmentionsoftip-tiltsystem.Thisimpliesthatthereisonlyonesystemandtheauthorsareusingitexclusively.Therearedoznsofothermisuses.Pages2,3,8,9,10,11,and12arelit