Pleaseusethisidentifiertociteorlinktothisitem::经营者集中反垄断审查的结构性救济措施——资产剥离OtherTitles:ReliefMeasuresforConcentrationofBusinessOperators-DivestitureAuthors:于野Keywords:经营者集中限制性条件救济措施结构性救济资产剥离ConcentrationofBusinessOperatorsRestrictiveConditionsReliefMeasuresStructuralRemediesDIssueDate:13-Oct-2009Abstract:“经营者集中反垄断审查救济措施”在国外称之为“合并救济”,为我国《反垄断法》第二十九条所规定之“限制性条件”,即执法部门通过对具有排除或者限制竞争效果的合并附加一定的“限制性条件”而批准该合并进行的措施,该项救济措施在国外实践中以结构性救济中的资产剥离为主要形式。从西方各主要发达国家反垄断审查的实践来看,很多国家都对合并救济做出了详尽、具体的规定,在实务中广泛应用并且取得显著的效果。然而我国相关法律对“限制性条件”的规定却极为简单,缺乏现实的操作性及指导意义。本文试图通过对美欧等发达国家成熟的立法、实践经验的介绍和整理,为我国“限制性条件”方面的立法、实践提供一定的借鉴。本文将主要介绍合并救济的理论基础、结构性救济的优点、资产剥离理论及原则、资产剥离程序、受托人、买受人的选择以及结构性救济效果等问题,并且对我国“限制性条件”立法提出一些立法建议。ReliefMeasuresforConcentrationofBusinessOperatorsisknownastheMergerRemediesinforeigncountries,inChina'santi-monopolylawisinArticletwenty-ninthastherestrictiveconditions.Remediesarerequiredwhenamergerorproposedmergerislikelytopreventorlessencompetitionsubstantiallyinoneormorerelevantmarkets.WhentheBureaubelievesthatamergerislikelytopreventorlessencompetitionsubstantially,itcaneitherprohibititornegotiateremedieswiththemergingpartiesinordertoresolvethecompetitionconcerns.Inforeigncountries’practice,Structuralremediesaretypicallymorepreferablethanbehaviouralremediesanddivestitureisthemostcommonform.Thispaperattemptstoprovideareferenceforrestrictiveconditionsinlegislationandpracticebyintroducingdevelopedcountries’legislationandpracticalexperiences.Thispaperintroducesthetheoryofthemergerremedies,thebenefitsofstructuralrelief,theguidingprinciplesofdivestiture,divestitureprocess,themonitortrustees,acceptablebuyerandsoon.Description:参考文献66URI::::OutstandingThesisofUndergraduateStudents本科生优秀毕业论文(2009)