搜索
123AbstractToday,althoughthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologyisveryfast,trafficaccidentisfarfromstoppingandseemedtomoreandmoregrave.AlongwiththefurtherdevelopmentofChineseeconomicandmoreandmoremotovehiclesdrivingonroad,trafficaccidentwillstillbeafocalpointinthesocietyinthefuture.Ifwesaypreventtrafficaccidentdependonthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology,renewalofequipmentandattentionofclient,thesolveofdisputeonlydependonacompletelegalsystem.Thisarticlewillprobeintothecivilliabilityoftrafficaccidentbyfourparts:Thefirstpartmainlyprobesintothenotionandfeaturesoftrafficaccident.Thewritepointsoutheretrafficaccidentisthefactthatpeoplesustainlossesbyoverturnofautomobilewhichrunningonthe4road.Yetthecivilliabilityoftrafficaccidentistheresponsibilitywhichsomepeoplebearforbecauseoftheirillegalactivities.Thesepeoplearedrivers,pedestrians,passengersandotherclients.Thesecondpartisthecoreofthisarticle,whichmainlyprobesintothedoctrineofliabilityfixationandconstitutivefactorsofthecivilliabilityintrafficaccident.Inthefirstplace,comparingthedoctrineofliabilityfixationofseveralmaincountriesintheworld,thewriterthinksadoptingprincipleofliabilitywithoutfaultrepresentativethemainlegislation’sattitudeandtrendofthesecountries.Tofollowup,thewriterself-criticismsourcountry’sattitudetothedoctrineofliabilityfixation.Itisillegalthatsomeplacesstipulated“strikingwithoutliability”.Weshouldsticktotheprincipleofliabilitywithoutfault.Thelast,thewriterthinksconstitutivefactorshasthreeparts.Firstly,requiringthelossesfact.Secondly,requiringtheactwhichautomobilerunningontheroad.Thirdly,requiringcausalrelationbetweentheabove-mentionedtwofactors.Thethirdpartisaboutbearingandexemptingofthecivilliabilityintrafficaccident.Aboveallthewriterprobesintotheestablish-basisofpersonliable.Hethinksthat.Thethirdpartisabouttheassumptionandreliefofthecivilliabilityoftrafficaccidence.Firstly,thebasisofestablishingthesubjectisinquiredinto.Theestablishmentoftheliabilitysubjectshouldadopttheprincipalsof“budgetingofmotion”and“interestofmotion”,and5theformershouldbegiventhefirstplace.Secondly,themainwaysofliabilityarecompensation,reconversion,returntheoriginalandapologia-offering.Oneoftheimportantquestionis,whethertheinjuredpartycanclaimmoralreparationiftheaccidentbringsaboutthemoralinjury.Theauthormaintainthattheinflictorshouldcompensatethemoralinjuryifthereis.Thirdly,theinflictormayclaimtobedissoluteofliabilityiftheaccidentoccursunderthecircumstanceofforcemajewre,accidenceandtheinjuredparty’sintentionandotherspecialmatters.Theforthpartputsforwardseveralconceptionsonhowtoimprovethepresentsituationoftrafficaccidenceliability.Firstly,theprincipalofliabilityshouldbeliabilitywithoutfault.Someruleslike“knockingsomeonetodeathwithoutliability”shouldbeabolished.Secondly,theliabilityinsuranceinstitutionontrafficaccidenceshouldbeconstructedandansummated.Theliabilityinsuranceshouldbeputintothecivilliabilityoftrafficaccidence.Asaresult,thecompensationoftheaccidencecanbesharedeffectivelyandtheinterestoftheinjuredpartycanbesafeguarded.61224551013131824282830343537117820202030009190719521955193019601972123123199192285010[1]21211123[2]12119301960[3]132190919527[4]31384[5]1930198575[6]1955[7]14[8]1972[9]19924334123123433[10]12315199191719199983089111213200041181612317[11][12][13]1819[14][15]2020[16][17]21123135[18][19]12223234432456725892611173117321192712341192851193773781617015611929120[20][21][22][23]20013882304910101031123153321212312331231271212343451281234561293585%2/3361191193719998308384921193939195819822719841512[24]4940[25]4142[1]200011[2]19876[3]509[4]509506[5]1998241[6]19912[7]1969315[8]1998241[9]21998173174[10]19912[11]2000916[12]2001218[13]199814243[14]200031[15]1998246[16]199724[17]199729[18]1995277[19]19912[20]19876[21]1958339[22]19876[23]1996668[24]DiasandMarkensinis,torflaw(2ndedn,1989)of440,441.[25]199630944120002199331997420005199761997719968199891998101998111996121992131998141999151995161993451719981819981919932019982119982219982319984620024