涪陵制药厂供应链合作伙伴选择研究

重庆大学硕士学位论文涪陵制药厂供应链合作伙伴选择研究姓名：蒋成军申请学位级别：硕士专业：工商管理指导教师：廖成林20060401I,IIABSTRACTWiththedevelopmentandmatureofSupplyChainManagementinChina,moreandmoreenterprisesknowtheimportantofimplementingsupplychainmangement,increasingthecorecompetitionadvantage,quicklyrespondingthemarketdemanding,moreservicefortheconsumer.IntraditionalChineseherbalmanufacturesareattemptingimplementingsupplychainmanagement,startingfromthefundmentalwork,accordingtotheenterprise’spracticalcondition,determinatingthestructuremodelofsupplychainmanagement.Incompliancewiththetheoryofsupplychainmanagement,pickingthestrategycooperativepartnerswhichareaccordwithdevelopmentofsupplychainmangement,whichrequiretheenterprisehascorrespondingevaluationindexsystemandevaluationmethod.Currently,quantificationandquantityconjunctingevaluationmethodsareappliedmore,throughappraisingthecorrespondingindexes,comprehensivelyevaluatingeachcooperativeparnterinthesupplychain.Fromthese,assuringthecooperativepartnerscoincidewiththesupplychain,aretheenterprise’sstrategypartners.Eachenterprisesinthesupplychain,learnfromeachother,showone’sownimportantrole,makethesupplychainbenigndevelopment.ThispaperthroughanalyazingthebackgroundofFulingpharmaceutical,explaintheexistingevaluatingmethodandindexofcooperativepartners.Pointingouttheproblemsofchoosingsupplychaincooperativepartners,andredisngingtheevaluationindexsystem,selectingnewappraisemethodofcooperativepartners.Throughevaluatingtheactualcooperativepartners,verifyingtheevaluationindexsystemandevaluationmethod.Allofthese,weputforwardsomeadvicesaboutimplementingsupplychainmangementofFulingpharmaceutical,whichavailtheoptionofsupplychaincooperativepartners.KeyWords:supplychaincooperativepartners,evaluationindexsystem,analyticalhierarchyprocess1111.11.1.12080(SupplyChainManagement)(208019811989)1989(20901990-1995)(20901996)Ghodsypour[1][1][2]BurtonDickson196623[3]30Dickson196623LehmannandandShaughnessy(1982)[4]12CaddickandDale(1987)[5]Ellram(1990)[6]Weber[7]Dickson1967199074Dickson232747WeberSymtkaandClemens(1993)[8]Patton(1996)[9]TagarasandLee(1996)[10]()[12][12][13][14][15]()[16][17-25][26]1.1.2[11][27][28][29][11][30][31]1.1.313:;——“”“”“”1.21.2.11.2.2“”“”141.31.3.11.3.21.1151.1Fig1.1Technicalrouteofthispaper26//22.12.1.1[11]2.12.1Fig2.1theStructureModelofSupplyChain27:“”“”“”“”1:2:3:4:“”562.1.2(APICS):“28[32]”FredA.Kuglin:““”()[32](Phillip)[15]:(Supply)(SchedulePlan)(Logistics)(Demand)2.22.2Fig2.2SupplyChainManagementInvolvinginFourFields2.2Internet/Intranet()internet/Intranet29:···()··——···Internet/Intranet()2102.22.2.1(MaloniBenton1997)(SupplyChainPartnership)[21]1211MRPJIT22123·WTO2.2.2SharpiroJITTQM213(time-based)(value-based)/[33]26350“”75001053:1.2.EDIInternet3.4.5.2.2.312.32142.3Fig2.3theProcessofBuildingSupplyChainPartnership2(1)215(2)RayB.BarneyVRIO(ValueRareImitateOrganization)[34](Porter)[35]VRIO2.4????====--MIS2.4VRIOFig2.4TheVRIOModelOfGeneralValueChain2.4:2162.4(3):(4):IT31733.13.1.1——1972111988“”1993“”1994“”“”2019981“”“”“”199930——200471.1100022760%9()200413123.1.25030103183.13.1Fig3.1TheSupplyChainManagementStructureofFuLingPharmceutical3.1Table3.1ThevendorapplicationtableofFulingpharmaceutical3193.2Table3.2ThevendordeclarationtableofFulingpharmaceutical32019982000E—mail3.21——32123.13.23.23.2Fig3.2TheethodofChoosingRawaterialsSupplierinFuLingPharmceutical322GMP3.33.3Fig3.3TheMethodOfChoosingPackingMaterialsSupplierInFulingPharmaceutical33233.43.4Fig3.4TheOrganizationStructureOfFulingPharmacetical3244532542644.1(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)4.260%~70%427428GMPGAPGMPGAPGAPGMP4294.3重庆大学硕士学位论文4涪陵制药厂合作伙伴选择评价指标体系设计30表4.1涪陵制药厂供应商评估表Table4.1ThevendorappraisingtableofFuolingpharmaceutical供应商名称：品名：评估日期：产品质量：□优秀□合格□不合格生产工序质量：□优秀□合格□不合格质量管理及检测：□优秀□合格□不合格质检、生产人员培训：□优秀□合格□不合格车间现场管理：□优秀□合格□不合格售前、后服务□优秀□合格□不合格生产设备性能：□优良□一般□差国内同品种质量：□高于□无差别□低于资信状况：□良好□中□差价格水平：□高□适中□低备注：评估结果：□合格□不合格评估人员：从上面的表格可以看出，涪陵制药厂目前选择供应商合作伙伴的指标全部都是定性化的，没有将其定量化。而且其选择指标虽然包含了前面分析影响涪陵制药厂评价指标的因素，但只是简单的把其用定性的方式表达出来，没有将其分别归类，体现出每类指标对评价一个供应链合作伙伴的重要性不同。所以根据前面的分析以及结合目前涪陵制药厂现有评价工作，我将涪陵制药厂的评价指标划为六个大类，增加了一些涪陵制药厂在做供应商评价时没有考虑到的因素，但是对正确的评价、选择合作伙伴有着重要影响的指标。首先是合作伙伴的企业绩效：根据调查显示，目前企业是为关心的是成本、价格，然后是质量。由此可见供应商的成本、价格对企业的重要性。要正确的判431PEST4324.14334.1Fig4.1TheEvaluationIndexSystemofSupplierPartnerinFulingPharmaceutical53455.15355.2[36]RoodhooftJozefKonings1996ABC(ActivityBasedCostingApproach)[37]BijDjBjcq)minPi(PBiS×∑+×-=(5.1)biSiPiiPminqBjCjBijDijbiS5.3(ArtificialNeuralNetworkANN)[38]80ANN536()DEAn(DMU)DMUms70T.L.SattyWeber(1991)[39]()[40]():5.45.4.1()()537[41]5.4.263866.1AA={B1B2B3B4B5B6}BiBi={C1C2C3…C17}CjBij6.16396.1Fig6.1TheStructureModelOfChoosingSupplierPartnerinFulingPharmaceutical6.2C16AB2B3B4B5B6B1C10C11C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C12C13C14C15C17C9重庆大学硕士学位论文6层次分析法在涪陵制药厂的实际应用40设的计划处，基本上每年都要派出大量的人员到原药材产地、辅料生产厂，进行实地调研，确定今年的供应形势。同时，通过提前发出邀请函的形式，最大化的招集到所有潜在的合格供应商，在通过初步形式审查以后，对符合涪陵制药厂供应基本要求的企业进行现场考察，进行资料收集，并从这些企业中挑选出四至五个作为待选供应商。根据涪陵制药厂的实际供应情况，我们拟从供应相关部门中找出各项指标评定的专家，组成一个专家小组，对每个评价指标的权重进行打分，得到统一的权重评价结果。从评价指标的六个大类中，我们分别对应的部门是供应总公司采购部、信息处、集团公司总经理办公室计划处、质量检测中心、总工程师办公室、生产处这几个部门。由以上几个部门主要负责人根据企业的战略发展，确定各级指标的重要性。由以上部门