安徽农业大学硕士学位论文农业标准化对安徽省农业经济增长的影响分析姓名:朱慧敏申请学位级别:硕士专业:农村与区域发展指导教师:张藕香2011-06I19950200917C-D1995-2009:IIAgriculturalstandardizationisaeffectivewaytoenhancethequalityofagriculturalproducts,copewiththenewbarrieroftheinternationaltrade,increasetheincomeoffarmersSince1995,agriculturalstandardizationworkaregainingmoreandmorepopularityinChinaandgettingnotableachievementonproductscertificationqualityandsafetyButwhateffectthisactionwouldhaveonagriculturaleconomicdevelopment?Whichwasnotreportedsystematicallyasyet.Underthebackground,asystematicalandintensivelystudyhasbeenpresentedinthispaper.Firstly,theconnotationofagriculturalstandardizationwasdefined.Influencingfactorsofthelevelofagriculturalstandardization,therelationshipbetweenthelevelofagriculturalstandardizationandagriculturaleconomicgrowth,andotherrelatedtheorywasanalyzed.basedonaboveanalysis,ThedevelopmentcourseofagriculturalstandardizationinAnhuiprovince,results,aswellasexistingproblemswasanalyzed.Indexsystemanditsindexofagriculturalstandardizationlevelevaluationwasbuiltbasedonaboveanalysis.thelevelstatusofagriculturalstandardization17cityinAnhuiprovincewasusedasanexampletotest.TheresultsofprincipalcomponentanalysisshowedthescoreofHefei,Huangshan,Suzhouisgreaterthanzero,thatmeanswhoseagriculturalstandardizationlevelishigherthantheaverageofwholeAnhuiprovince.WhiletheothersevencityislessthantheaverageofwholeAnhuiprovince.EspeciallyTongling,Huainan,Maanshanmaybewhichareindustrycity.Theresultsofclusteranalysisshowedthatseventeencitiesareclassifiedintofourgroupsbymeansofclusteranalysisasfollows:(1)Hefeicity,asaprovincialcapitalcity,whichhadabundanttechnicalresources,andhadanobviouscomparativeadvantageinformulatingandImplementationstandard.(2)Fuyang,Suzhou,Bozhoucity,asagriculturalcity,whichhadabundantinagriculturalproduce.(3)Luan,Huangshan,whichhadspecialnaturalenvironmentandrichindistinctivecommodity,(4)theothercity,whichareindustrycityorWanjiangurbanbeltcityFurther,theeffectofagriculturalstandardizationoneconomydevelopmentwaspracticalstudiedlengthwaysandlandscapedimension.Inlandscapedimension,thecrosssectordataofAnhuiprovince17cityin2009wasanalyzedbypartialleastsquaremethod.Theresultsshowedtheeffectispoor.Inlengthwaysdimension,serialdataofAnhuiprovincein1995-2009wasfurtheranalyzedbyCDfunction.TheresultsshowedtheeffectAbstractIIIispositive,thoughnon-significantsuchexistingproblemsaslowagriculturalstandardizationlevel,incompleteandimperfectmarketmechanism,unawarenessofagriculturalstandardization,weakgovernmentalsupervisionandsoonaremainreasontocauselimitedpositiveeffect.Toacertaindegree,theimplementingeffectsofagriculturalstandardizationwerethegameresultsofbenefit-relatedunits.Supply-demandmodelandNashbalancedmodelareusedtoanalyzetherelationshipamongthestandardizationbehaviorsubjects(government,farmerandenterprise).Theanalysisresultofthesupply-demandmodelshowsthattheeffectofagriculturalstandardizedproductiononfarmers'incomeisdeterminedbyhowmuchprofitswhichhasbroughttofarmers.TheanalysisresultoftheNashbalancedmodelshowsthatthethreebehavioursubjects(government,farmerandenterprise)shouldachieveNashbalance,asarationalactor,thegovernmentmustgivesubsidiestofarmersandenterprisesofstandardizedproduction.Thus,theimplementationeffectofagriculturalstandardizationultimatelydependsonthedegreeoffinancialsubsidies.Onthebasisofaboveanalysis,thepolicysuggestionsonestablishingmarketaccesssystemofagriculturalproducts,intensifyingpublicityagriculturalstandardization,strengthengovernmentalsupervision,andexpandingfinancialsubsidieswasputforward.AgriculturalStandardization,EconomicGrowth,Practicalanalysis,GameAnalysisKeywords:1[1][2][3]2004722005412009173100731761870549368911161[4]11.1.11.12[5]1-11.1.21.1.31.2.11.231-1Fig1-1Technologyroadmap17171995CD4CD1975[6]2008GB35331-2009(NIST)[7]19601996196019900.9[8]BeuthVerlag[9]20017716030[10]BSI1948200225%[11]BlindK[12][13]1.2.21.3.11.35199020024.8%[14]19782007GDP0.79%[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]1.3.21.3.361231231.47[41][41][42]22.1.12.1.22.18[43]+[44][45][46]9()2.210(Innovationtheory)(JosephASchumpeter)thesettingupofanewproductinfunction[47][48]2.311[49][50][50]“”12[51]136632674[53](19781995)1993(19962000)199711199922000(2001)200344200472200541200812[2010]27201062009620200979530033.13.2141301954361001007340701520200997.21001002010459610010097.59358187054936891116182008870860.2%3689111101425.8%127161173643614.49200959.4325%14123.315200933171053017337“”16[25][31][34][52]44.1.14.1.24.1173[52]6144-14.1.318GMPHACCPISO9000ISO140001995193-1Fig3-1IndexsystemofevaluationonthelevelofagriculturalstandardizationHACCPGAP2020101710X1X2X3X4X5X6X7HACCPX8GAPX9X104-14-1200917Tab4-1Themainagriculturalstandardizationspecificationsof17cityofAnhuiprovincein20094.2174.2.121(1)(2)20KarlCharlesSpearmen[54]KMOabRcR185%kdkxi4.2.222Fj=pIjXI+pZjXZ+pPjXP4-1j=12mFjjXpBartletteAnderson-Rubin200917SPSS16.0R4-24-2Tab4-2Thematrixofthecoefficientcorrelation4-385.00%4-343.6372.0981.5691.30386.065623413.63736