pseudoeventfakenewsThereasonwechoosetouseWechatofficialaccount,ItiswidelyusedWhywechoseFAKENEWSasourthemeInthepast10years,greatquantitiesoffakenewsfrequentlyappearinvariousmedia.Itneedstoberevealedandanalysed.It’snotuncommonthatsomejournalistsmakeupfalseormisleadingstoriesaboutcelebrities,illnesses,crimes,etc.Takecelebritiesforexample.ThedeathofthefamouswriterJinYongappearedinseveralnewsreportsin2010,whichprovedtobefalse.WeholdtheviewthatourWechatofficialaccountcandrawpublic’sattentionBECAUSEFakenewsarenowahotpointinallovertheworld,Chinaespecially.WehopethatthroughthisthemeFakeNews,wecanbroadeneveryreaders’horizonsofmediacredibilityandteacheveryonetodistinguishwhetherthenewsistrueorfakesothattheycannotspreadfakenewslikeothers.Weusecuteandcolorfulpictures,releasingmusicandrelatedfakenewsvideosineverynewarticle.What’smore,wewillanswereveryquestionthatisputforwardbyourfollowerssothattheycanbeinterestedinouraccountandlearnmoreaboutfakenews.FAKENEWSSomenewsmediaorjournalistsreportfakenewsonpurposesoastodrawpublicattentionaswellasmakeprofits.TaketheChenYongzhoucaseasanexample.In2013,ajournalistofXinKuaibaonamedChenYongzhouwroteseveralarticles,forpersonalinterest,toaccuseaChinesecompanyZoomlionHeavyIndustryofsalescounterfeitoutofnothing.Thesereportsarousedgreatpublicattentionandbroughtabouthugeeconomiclossesandreputationdamagetothecompany.Afterthiscase,fiercedebateaboutmediacredibilityoccurredamongthepublic.Civilians,onceagain,losetheirfaithondomesticmediaindustry.Mediahasaninterentresponsibilitytoillustratefactsandrightvaluestothepublic.Itplaysaverysignificantroleinthelifeofcivilians,theworkofgovernmentofficials,andtheever-changingenvironmentofthemarket.Nowadays,however,thecredibilityofmedia,especiallythoseownedbythegovernmentbegintofade.Undersuchkindofcircumstance,manypeopleprefertobelieveeventhoseincrediblestoriesonlineratherthantheofficialannouncementmadebystate-runmedia.Thiskindofcircumstanceisverynegative.Asaresult,we,studentsmajoredinmedia,musttakeactionstoChangethewholeenvironmentandfindtohelphomemediagaincredibilityagain.ThelossofcredibilityinmediaFakenewscause“secondaryvictimzation”The“secondaryvictimization”ofjournalismnewsisacommonphenomenonintoday‘ssocietyandreflectsomeirregularitiesandlackofself-disciplinesintoday’snewsreport.Inourofficialaccount,weanalyzethe“secondaryvictimization”ofjournalismnewsthroughanumberofcases.Withtherapiddevelopmentofmedia,somepractitionersreportthefalsenewsinordertocatchtheaudienceseyeballswhichcausethepeopleinvolvedbecomingthevictimagain.The“secondaryvictimization”isanobstacleofthedevelopmentofjournalismandhasastrongimpactonsocialstability.sThepictureaboveisafakenewscomeoutin2013,whichsaidthatMr.BEANhaddied.Thisnewsdrewpublic’sattentionandnetizensspreadthenewsquickly.ButsoonMr.BEANappearedinthepublicandtoldeveryonethatthisnewswastotallyfake.Exampleslikethiscanbefoundinourofficialaccounttoknowmoreaboutfakenews.Fakenewswillmisleadthepublic.1.Truthisthelifeofnewsanditisthemostbasicrequirementofthenews.Fakenewsnotonlydisturbthenormalsocialandeconomiclife,andalsoseriouslydamagethecredibilityofthemediaandthegovernment'simage.Objectivereportisthebasicprincipleforajournalistandmediaorganizations.Becauseoftheneedofcommercialization,thefakenewswasproduced.AnanalysisofidentificationskillsonfalsenewsphotosThereisanoldsayinginChina:Seeingisbelieving.Sometimespeopleprefertobelieveintheireyesanotherthantheirear.Sonewsphotosaremoreconvincingthanwords.However,withthedevelopmentofimageprocessingtechnologyinrecentyears,itiscommonthatnewsphotosarefaked,evensomeofthemhavegainedtheawardofinternationalphotographybefore.Itleadsseeingisbelievingtoseeingisnotbelieving.Toguardthetruthsofthenewsandwinthetrustofaudiences,weshouldlearnhowtoidentifyfalsenewsphotos.AsaChinese,fakenewsinChinaarelistedinouroffcialaccountaswell,whichwethinkcanarisefollowersinterestsandreadmoreaboutwhatwedisplaytothem.假新闻生成器SuggestionsgiventoprohibitfakenewsBasedontheanalysisofreasonwhyfalsenewsappears,wehavebroughtforwardseveralmeasurestopreventithappenfrequently.Themaincausethatfakenewsappearisgossips,theneglectofdutyandmediumcollectiveplans.Prohibitingfalsenews,preventingdishonestreportsmuststrengthenjournalistssenseofresponsibility.Forinstance,journalistswhoarefoundtomanipulatenewsshouldbeseverelypunishedandcouldbebannedfromnewswritingfortenyearsormore.Fakenewscanfoolreadersforaperiodoftime,buteventuallythewritersfoolthemselves.Someforeigngovernmentshavenotedtheseriousnessofthefrequentappearanceoffakenewsandithasbeguntotakeseverepunishmentmeasures,too.Turkey'sparliamenthaspassedanInternetControlLaw,whichruledthatthosewhomadefakenews,libeledothersordidsomethinglikethesemustbefinedwithin$85000.Improvingrelevantlawsandstrengtheninglegislationaretwolegalmeanstoputanendtofalsenews.Preventionoffalsenewsdependsonthelawsinadditiontotrustingtheself-disciplineofnewsindustry.Realitycallsforspecialnewslegislationtopunishthemakersoffakenews.Onlyinthislegalforcecanstandardizationoftherulesofnewscommunication.Butnewsind