搜索
半开放式作文Ⅰ【写作指导】半开放式作文是近年来英语学科书面表达的一个趋势和要求，是一种常见题型。所谓“半开放”是指试题给出部分要点，考生自己再增加一些要点。这样的作文可以分为两大部分:试题给出的材料和自己增加的材料。在写给出材料时一定注意不要遗漏要点，更不要曲解试题的意思。在写自己增加部分时也不可以随意发挥，要吃透命题人的意思。例如:关于中学生是否可以把手机带进教室，我们最好不赞成带手机进教室，因为命题人一般是大中学校的老师，他们是不会赞成学生带手机进教室的。最近教育部就高中取消文理分科的可能性和可操作性，广泛征集意见。消息一经传出，立即成为人们热议的话题。社会各方对此存在严重分歧。请你给ChinaDaily写一篇文章，阐述分歧，并发表自己的观点（至少两点）。支持者反对者主要群体专家家长和学生理由取消文理分科有利于学生全面发展。分科会导致部分文科学生理科知识缺乏，部分理科学生不关心社会学科。取消文理分科将加重学生学习负担。分科尊重学生个体差异。发表自己的观点要求：1）可根据内容要点适当增加细节，使行文连贯。2）词数：150字左右。短文开头已为你写好，不计入词数。参考词汇：1．文理分科：dividestudentsintoscienceandart2．文科生；liberalartstudents3．理科生：sciencestudentsTheMinistryofEducationhasbeencollectingopinionsonthepossibilityandfeasibilityofendingtheseparationofscienceandartsinhighschools.Butopinionsaredifferent.解题指导1.谋篇布局，拟定框架。本文可分四段写：第一段：导入话题。(试卷上已给出了.)第二段：专家的观点:支持文理分科及其理由.第三段：学生和家长的观点.第四段：你自己的观点.2.写作模板:这篇作文属于”支持与反对观点陈述类”,可套用作文训练材料的A模板(P1,叫学生找出该模板)Mostexpertsholdtheviewthat…………………………………….……………………………………….However,manystudentsandparentshavejusttheoppositeopinion.……………Inmyopinion,………………..3.统筹时态、人称：时态：整篇文章用一般现在时，个别地方可能会用到“一将”。人称：陈述专家或学生及家长的看法时，用第三人称：Mostexperts，manystudentsandparents，they.发表自己的观点时，用第一人称I。4.推敲要点表达方法:1)取消文理分科有利于学生全面发展。取消文理分科:theendingofthedivisionofscienceandart,全面发展:all-rounddevelopment/developmentinanall-aroundway/integrateddevelopment如果你不知道”全面发展”怎样表达,你可以将上句婉转写成:文理分科影响学生的综合素质.affecttheoverallqualityofstudents.2)导致…的缺乏:leadto/resultinsb.’slacking….3)不关心社会学科:notcareaboutsocialscience,suchas….4)将加重学生学习负担:putmorepressureandburdensonstudents5)分科尊重学生个体差异。这句话可分解成:每个学生都有自己的长处和弱点,分科是尊重学生的意愿.haveone’sownadvantages/strengthsandweaknesses,showrespectforone’sopinion/interest.5.难点:半开放式作文难就难在自己的观点上.会写的,就能得到另外两个要点的分;不会写的或观点不恰当的,就可能失分.因此,发表自己的观点非常重要.对于文理分科,你可以说:过早分科不利于学生未来的发展;如果现行的考试制度不改革,就没有必要谈论这个问题;最后要求教育部对此事要慎重考虑.6.要点提炼:要点1:专家赞成取消文理分科.Mostexpertssupporttoendtheseparationofscienceandarts.Mostexpertsareinfavorofendingthedivisionofscienceandarts.Someexpertssupporttheendingofthedivisionofscienceandarts.Someexpertsholdtheviewthatthedivisionofscienceandartsshouldbeended/cancelled.要点2:取消文理分科有利于学生全面发展。Theendingoftheseparationofscienceandartscontributestostudents’overalldevelopment.Theendingofthedivisionofsubjectshelpsstudentsdevelopinanall-aroundway.Theendingofthedivisionofsubjectsisgoodforstudents’integrateddevelopment.Theseparation/divisionofsubjectsaffectstheoverallqualityofstudents.要点3:分科会导致部分文科学生理科知识缺乏，部分理科学生不关心社会学科。Thedivision/separationofsubjectsleadstosomeartstudents’lackingscienceknowledgewhilesciencestudentsdon’tcareaboutsocialscience.Thedivision/separationofsubjectsresultinsomeartstudents’lackofscienceknowledgeandsciencestudents’notcaringaboutsocialsubjects,suchashistoryandpolitics.要点4:家长和学生反对取消分科.Manyparentsandstudentsopposetheendingoftheseparation/divisionofsubjects.Manyparentsandstudentsareagainsttheendingofthedivisionofsubjects.要点5:取消文理分科将加重学生学习负担。Theendingoftheseparationofsubjectswillputmorepressureandburdensonstudents.Theendingoftheseparationofsubjectswilladdmorepressureandburdenstostudents.Theendingoftheseparationofsubjectswillincreasestudents’pressureandburdens.要点6:分科尊重学生个体差异。Thedivisionofsubjectsmeansshowingrespectforstudents’interest.自己观点1:Dividingsubjectstooearlyisnotgoodforstudents'futuredevelopment.自己观点2:TheMinistryofEducationhadbettertakeacarefulattitudetowardthisproblem.连句成文:SampleIMostexpertsareinfavorofendingtheseparationofscienceandarts.Foronereason,theendingofthedivisionofsubjectscontributestostudents’developmentinanall-aroundway.Foranother,dividingsubjectswillleadtoartstudents’lackingscienceknowledgewhilesomesciencestudentswon’tcareaboutsocialsubjects,suchashistoryandpolitics.However,someparentsandstudentshavetheoppositeopinion.Theythinktheendingofthedivisionofsubjectswilladdmorepressureandburdenstostudents.Dividingsubjectsmeansshowingrespectforstudents’interestaseachstudenthashisorherownstrengthsandweaknesses.Inmyopinion,dividingsubjectstooearlyisnotgoodforstudents'futuredevelopment.IhopetheMinistryofEducationhadbettertakeacarefulattitudetowardthisproblem.Mostexperts,whosupporttheendingofthedivisionofscienceandart,insistthatthedivisionofsubjectsstronglyaffecttheoverallqualityofourpeople,andtheyalsothinkthatitwillresultinsomeartstudents'lackingscienceknowledgeandsomesciencestudents'notcaringaboutimportantsubjectslikesociety,socialscience,historyandsoon.However,manystudentsandparentsopposethisopinion,sayingthatcancelingthedivisionofsubjectsmeansputtingmorepressureandburdensonstudents,whilefocusingonfewercoursesenablesstudentstodobetterintheirfavoritesubjects.Furthermore,eachstudenthashisorherownadvantagesandweaknesses,whichneedstobeencouraged.Inmyopinion,dividingsubjectstooearlyisnotgoodforstudents'futuredevelopment.Foronething,itisunnecessarytotalkaboutthisissueifthepresentsystemofexaminationisn'treformed,andforanothertheMinistryofEducationhadbettertakeacarefulattitudetowardthisproblem.That’sall.半开放式作文Ⅱ假如你们班在“珍爱生命，拒闯红灯”的教育活动中，召开了一次主题班会。请你根据下表内容，用英语写一篇短文。行人（passer-by）闯红灯的危害妨碍交通，影响车辆的正常行驶。容易引发事故，危及他人和自身的生命安全。……（自己设想）对行人闯红灯的处罚措施批评教育，让其认识到闯红灯的危害性。当场给予警告并罚款。……（自己设想）注意：1.内容可适当发挥，注意行文连