Doscienceandtechnologychangeourlivesforthebetterorfortheworse?Nowadays,withthedevelopmentofscience,ourlifehasageathistoricchangethanbefore.Simultaneously,thechangesweresorapidlythattakingsomanyproblems.Theargumentaboutthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologyhencebecameineluctable.Somepeopleheldtheviewthatthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologywasgood.Theybelievedthattheadvantageoutweighedthedisadvantage.Owingtothedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology,ourlifecouldgetgreatabundantandconvenient.Theinventionofelectriclight,newtransportation,Internet--Nobodydidnotbenefitfromthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology.Comparingwiththepasttime,thehealthofhumanandthestandardofourlifehadchangedalot......Nothingwhathavinggreatimprovedidnotdependonthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology.Wewouldloseeverythingwehadgotifwelostit.However,theotherpeopleinsistedthatthedisadvantageoutweighedtheadvantage.Themattersthatscienceandtechnologytookwereunprecedentedinspiteofbenefitingfromthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnology.Thefirstproblemwasthepollution.Itwasthemostimmediateproblemthatthescienceandtechnologytook.Notonlyourwater,butalsoourfoodbecamemoreandmoreinsecureduetothepollution.Moreover,wemustcareaboutourworldtoensureitdidnotruinbythewarthatnewtechnologysupported.Thedestructionofscienceandtechnologywaslethalandunimaginable.Nevertheless,therewasanotherthingwehavetoface:theMRSA.Nowadays,themodernmeansofscienceandtechnologycouldn'tdealwiththisproblemcausedbyitself.Sotheyhadtosaythatthedevelopmentofscienceandtechnologyenhancedthefatalnessofourlife.Anyway,everycoinhasitstwosides.So,weshouldbemoredialecticalwhenwedowiththeproblem.Onlyinthiswaycouldweletthescienceandtechnologyserveforhumanbetterandbetter.