合同无效及其后果研究

12345678«»«»91011199151.5X382001.5X381.5X381.5X38401.33610611215919.9841.5X3812199231029840.8971.5X38,13,59141516171819202122232425??262728293031325961,,33,,3435363738MALAURIE39404142,.434411999612199591319993141999415199816199945171999618---9---10---1119965112199681131994211415199791,46SummaryThepublicationandimplementationoftheContractlawofthePeople’sRepublicofChinawhichiscalledtheunifiedcontractlawstopthehistorywiththreespecializedcontractlaws.Thenon-effectivenessof47contracthasbeenregulatedin‘GeneralCivilianLaw’,EconomicContractLaw,TechnicalContractLawandForeignEconomicContractlawrespectively.Followingthedevelopmentofthedomesticeconomy,Somecontradictionshaveshownintheoriginallyexistinglaws,andalsoseriouslyandnegativelyinfluencethecontractingpractice.Thistreatisedealwiththefollowingtwoaspects:First,dissertatesomekeyitemsinrespectofthenon-effectivenessofcontract,mainlyincluding:analysesthedifferentregulationsfortheChineseContractLawandtheothernational(MainlytheFranceContractLaw)contractlawfromthecomparing-lawpointofview.Emphasizethequalityofthecontractwhichsignedunderthebeguilementandthethreatening,andalsosomeotherpointsinrespectiveoftheillegalcontractsand,theunfixedeffectivecontracts,clearlystatethenecessityofthelaw-definingconceptinChina.Secondly,emghasisinglydissertatetheresultsofthenon-effectivenesscontract,mainlyincluding:thedatebackingforceandotheritemsofthenon-effectivenesscontractfromthecomparinglawpointofview.Basedonthediscussion,furtherdiscussedthetheoreticofthenon-effectivenessofcontractandalsotheimplementationoftheunifiedcontractinthepractice.WishtocontributealittleinthecreationandpracticeoftheContractLaw.19974820004