政府采购恶意串通的法律规制

湘潭大学硕士学位论文政府采购恶意串通的法律规制姓名：陈建贞申请学位级别：硕士专业：经济法指导教师：陈乃新20050430AbstractSincegovernmentprocurementcameintopractice,thescaleofgovernmentprocurementinourcountryisexpandingconstantly.Especiallyafterthelawthatspeciallystandardizestheworkofgovernmentprocurementisissued,thewayofgovernmentprocurementchangingfromdispersingpurchasingtocentralizingpurchasingtheworkofgovernmentprocurementismorenormal.Buttheregulationof“lawofgovernmentprocurement”isquitecoarseandcrude,thequestionisnotalsorareinpractice.Acommonproblemisthatmaliciouscollusionsamongthepartiesofgovernmentprocurement,whichharmthenationalinterestsandtherightoffaircompetitionofothersuppliers’.Andthedamagebroughtbyitisastonished.Maliciouscollusionisaconceptincivillaw,soIwillusetherelevanttheoryonitincivillawtodefinemaliciouscollusioningovernmentprocurementinthistext,andthenstudyits’originofemerging.Governmentprocurementincludesthreepartiesatleast,namelypurchaser,theagencyforpurchasingandsupplier.Thelegalwaysofgovernmentprocurementincludecompetitivebidding,invitedbidding,competitivenegotiation,purchasingfromsinglesourceandinquiringtheprice.Therearemaliciouscollusionsinsuchfivelegalwaysamongtwoormanysideswhichdamagetheinterestsofnationandsuppliers.Becauseoftheparticularityofthecompetitivebidding,thereisaphenomenonthatmaliciouscollusionexistsbetweensupplierandsupplier.Andtheseareunfavorabletothefaircompetitionamongsuppliers,diminishthequalityofgovernmentprocurementandalsobringgreatlossestosocialresource.Facingsomanymaliciouscollusionsinthegovernmentprocurement,primaryworkthatweshoulddoistoperfectthelegalregulationonmaliciouscollusionsingovernmentprocurement.Thisincludesmainlytwotasks.Thefirsttaskistoperfectthemechanismofsupervisiontopreventmaliciouscollusionsingovernmentprocurement.Atthesametime,thetraditionallitigationshavedeficiencyininvestigatingthepeoplewhohavemaliciouscollusionsingovernmentprocurement,sothesecondtaskistosetupthepublicinterestlitigationtoinvestigatetheirresponsibilitiesandprotectthedamagedinterests.Keywords:governmentprocurementmaliciouscollusionlegalregulationpublicinterestlitigation119952002629257277797277792123318191782179218611946()197941995(WTO)(GovernmentProcurementAgreement)199419951998291999[1]20026295[2][3]2123456(GDP)10%GDP12%1989—1992GDP26%—27%10%[4]110%19996160032%[5]273[6]182394[7]10[8][9][10][11][12]11[13]1234[14]12:312[15][16]13[17]12143rent-seeking[18]15[19]34%70%[20]?[21][22]16191776[23][24]17[25][26]1819252820261[27]1212()21231999145410[28]224?[29]3[30]2923303124“”200391125432414321995199831199913020003282001653200210002003150010%-15%[31]200426[32]1050050027470470[33]28GDP10%[34]29[35]133090[36][37][38]31[39][40]13223[41]33[42][43][44][45]2334[46][47]36635[48][49]12363[50][51]371[52]2387277397979[53]4072777941[54][55][56][57]42434445[1]2003457[2]2004447[3]WTO2002765[4]2003456[5]2003458[6]20027263[7]200421[8]1997259[9]1996235[10]1997105[11]1990242-243[12]1994208[13]1996235[14]1997260[15]1990243-245[16]461990243-245[17][18]1999226-227[19]2004230[20]2004631[21]1987662000284[22]2004231[23]1997747[24]2004627[25]2004627[26]2002732[27]1999192[28]2004231[29][30]:[31]2004761[32]2001327[33]2004231[34]2004231[35]7277[36]60[37]2003213-214[38]2004762[39]2004661[40]2004764[41]20031216[42]2004763[43]2004233[44]——2003419[45]200423548[46]2003213-214[47]——2000513[48]2004416-18[49]2004629[50]20043110[51]2004218[52]2004312[53]200168-69[54]19995102[55]200392[56]200353[57]2003265491.[M].:,1999:375-396192-194.2.[M].:,2000:189-193.3.[M].:,2003:2153-5788-96262-266.4.[M].:,2002:213-223.5.[M].:,1996:221-242.6.[M].:,1996:258-274.7.[M].:,1997:105.8.[M].:,2003:213-214234-246.9.[M].:,1997:259.10.[M].:,1994:46-63.11.[M].,2001:65-72.12.[M].:,1994:208-214.13..[M].:,1990:241-247.14.[M].:,2004:12-26.15.[J].,2004(6):51-53.16.WTO[J].,2003(7):138-141.17.[J]..2004(11):39.5018,.[J].,2003(7):20-23.19.[J].,2003(4):76-79.20.[J].,2003(2):37-38.21.[J].,2002(9):29-31.22,.[J].,2002(8):31.511200432200443——200494200435200515253199520026292[1]54[2]——55——567277797957[1]200421[2]200423158SynopsisThegovernmentprocurementofourcountryhadworkedfrom1995sincepilotprojectofShanghaitonow,governmentprocurementislargerandlarger.Afterthe28thsessionofstandingcommitteeoftheninthnationalpeople'sconferenceonJune29,2002passedlawofgovernmentprocurement,thewayofgovernmentprocurementofourcountryischangingfromcentralizedpurchasingtodispersedpurchasing,andtheworkofpurchasingnormsfurtherly.Becausethislawregulatesrelativelysimple,thequestionsinthegovernmentprocurementarestillemergingconstantly,suchasmaliciouscollusionsingovernmentprocurement,encroachingontheownershipofstate-runassetsandtherightofsuppliers’toparticipateinthefaircompetition,havebroughtseriousdangerstocountryandsociety.Theauthorthinksweshouldstrengthenthelegalregulationonittotakeprecautionsagainstmaliciouscollusionsinthecourseofpurchasing.Forthisreason,theauthorwillhavecarriedonthediscussiononthelegalregulationonmaliciouscollusionsingovernmentprocur