20067334SEEKINGTRUTHJuly,2006Vol.33No.4:1,2(1.,264209;2.,250100):,,,,,,:;;;:(1963-),,,,,;(1974-),,,,,:D90-059:A:1000-7504(2006)04-0081-06:2006-03-20,,;,;,[1](P31),,,[2](P32),,;,;,;,[3](P33),,,,,,,?,,,,,,18??,,,,,,,,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[2](P15),,,,[2](P16),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[1](P40),,,,,,1.,,,,[3](P112),,,,28:,20036,,,,,,;,,,(),()[4](P9),,;2.,:,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,,,,,,[5](P23),,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,[6](P329),,[7](P241),,,,,,,,,,,,,383.,[8](P153),,[8](P158),:,,[9](P329),,;,,,,,,[10](P226),4.,,,,,,,,,,,:,[11](P576),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,[2](P20),,,,,,,,48,,,,,:,,,,,(),,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[2](P37),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(),,,[2](P51),,58,,,,(),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[1](P52),,,,,[1],.,[M].:,2005.[2].[M].:,2005.[3].[M].:,2001.[4].[A]..:[C].:,2001.[5].,[M].:,1998.[6].[M].:,1997.[7].,[M].:,1988.[8].[A].,.[C].:,2003.[9].[A]..[C].:,1998.[10].[Z]..[11].,[M].:,1994.[]LegalityofEverydayLifeTheRelationbetweenLegalThinkingandEverydayThinkingCHENJin-zhao1,FANChun-ying2(1.ShandongUniversityatWeihai,Weihai,Shandong264209,China;2.ShandongEconomicUniversity,Jinan,Shandong250100,China)Abstract:Eversincetherisingofphilosophyhermeneutics,juristshavebeenconnectingthemeansofdogmaticin2terpretationandinquiryinterpretation.Andwhatsmore,thecoherenceofthoughthasbeenupliftedtoahighposi2tion,andthetraditionalinterpretationtheoryhasbeenreplacedbytheargumentationtheory.However,seenfromitsprimarytendency,legalthoughtstillbehavesastheflexibleexertionoflawonthepremiseofnolapsingfromthenomocracyprinciple.Theturnaroundofhermeneuticshasnotfundamentallygotridofthepatternofthoughtaccord2ingtolaw.Thismakesuptheultimatedifferencebetweendailythoughtandlegalthought.Theboundaryofdailythoughtandlegalthoughtisnotinvariable.Inasocietyofnomocracy,thesetwoaspectsinfluencemutuallyandchangeceaselessly.Butthiskindoftransformationisrealizedbypromotingthelegalnatureofdailylife.Keywords:legalthought;dailythought;legalinterpretation;legalmethod68