要约邀请的法律效力分析

上海交通大学硕士学位论文要约邀请的法律效力分析姓名：刘胜磊申请学位级别：硕士专业：法律指导教师：顾祝轩20081207ANALYSISTOVALIDITYOFINVITATIONTOOFFERABSTRACTThispaperfirstgivesabriefintroductionofinvitationtoofferintermsofhistoricaldevelopment.Althoughtherehavebeenlotsofdiscussionsaboutinvitationtoofferontheory,butinpracticeofthelegislation,thereareverylimitedlawsandregulationstomakeacleardefinitionaboutit,suchastheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoodsandContractLawofthePeople'sRepublicofChina.Atthesametime,thispapersummedupthevarietytheoryaboutinvitationtoofferonlegalcharacterandlegalsense,andsummedupthepointsandreasonswhyscholarstomakesuchasupportingview.Therearesomeverywell-knownscholarsbelievethattheinvitationtoofferhavenolegalsignificanceasfaitsjuridiques,butadispensablesection.Withthechangingoftimesandcircumstances,it’snecessarytore-maketheinvitationtooffertheory.Onthebasisofcontractualanalysis,theinvitationtooffershouldberegardedasactofrepresentationthathasthenatureofexpressionofintent.Intermsoflegalvalidity,invitationtooffershouldbedeterminedinaccordancewithitsspecificformulationInthelightofactualcircumstances.Theviewofinvitationtoofferisnon-legalsense,whichheldbymanyscholars,hasnotbeenrecognizedinspecificciviljudicialpractice.Finally,theauthorgiveadiscussionthewayhowinvitationtooffertoachieveforceoflaw.Firstofall,aslegalsense,invitationtooffershouldnaturallybelongtothecontractingprocess,it’sreasonabletotakeliabilityiftherelianceinterests’losswereresultfromformnegligenceininvitationtooffer.Second,ifspecificcommitmentsmadeexplicitlyininvitationtooffer,theinvitationtooffershouldbetreatedascontractualobligations.Finally,Invitationtoofferhasthelegalattributeofexpressingintent,ithasbindingforceoflawinsomecases,andthefraudulentinvitercanbeprosecutedfortortliability.KEYWORDS:invitationtooffer,legalcharacter,legalsense,legalvalidity20092220092220092212312312003333721978919319919128344()420001140556789()105200042426199991587200081988200011409(1)2002212-2131020003136643443711121314151120062150-152122005252813200342861142004186152005125271617162005125617200512568910111999121.19132.200085/5771415198218,1920211893100181995113191995116201995124-3121200622260161002223247154222198423199910178241999121911725(130)26272526[]20002527199555-571819912050011352281979482328281989192929362021:3031423230[](1)19988931[]L.L.R.200452532()1999222324:,,,,253:26::2745:38:285854?33343319921523461998213291103031[1]20022[2]20036[3]20051[4]20002[5]20034[6]20072[7]20041076[8]2000116[9]19931[10]200744[11]20025[12]15200863[13]320075[14]20013[15]20043[1]200811173-178[2]20041121-128[3]199191278-296[4]20004239-65[5]19993115-16[6]20051249-63[7]199912189-95[8]20001138-4932[9]20063155172-174[10]559-581[11]-20009174-140,261-268[12]199881292-2973334[1]200811要约邀请的法律效力分析作者：刘胜磊学位授予单位：上海交通大学本文读者也读过(10条)1.禹丽论要约与要约邀请之区分[期刊论文]-法制与社会2010(22)2.王敬华.WANGJinghua论要约邀请的法律意义之有无[期刊论文]-武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）2007,60(2)3.伍玉功.郑太福论要约的法律效力[期刊论文]-湖南师范大学社会科学学报2000,29(5)4.李金磊.LiJinlei要约的特征及其法律效力[期刊论文]-价值工程2010,29(22)5.汪和振要约效力探析[学位论文]20086.赵玉意.ZhaoYuyi论我国合同法中的要约回转[期刊论文]-黑河学刊2009(8)7.吕军尚.吕振杰论要约的效力[期刊论文]-理论月刊2005(2)8.尹晓凤论要约的效力[期刊论文]-民风2008(11)9.付爱云论要约[学位论文]201010.陈嘉凯小议要约与要约邀请的区别[期刊论文]-致富时代（下半月）2010(8)本文链接：