搜索
一辩陈词自由辩：二辩：纸质书比电子书更有利于身体健康.Thereisnodoubtabouttherapiddevelopmentofthee-book,butwedon’tthinkthatpaper-bookswillbereplacedbye-books.Nowadays,peoplearepayingmoreandmoreattentiontohealthissues.Itisimportanttorealizethate-booksareeasytocausedamageofoureyesandvisionloss;Andthereareotherhealthrisksusinge-books.Whenwereade-booksratherthanpaper-booksforalongtime,paper-booksaremorehealthiertothereaders.反方二辩：看纸质书看久了也会对视力不好Itisimportanttorealizethatpaper-booksarealsoeasytocausedamageofoureyesandvisionlosswhenwereadforalongtime.Forexample,Sushi(苏轼)isalsoamyopiaman.一辩：纸质书给作者的版权保护更完整，更能保证收入，而且纸质书拥有的是所有权而电子书只是使用权Anotherproblemisthecopyright.Despitethecurrentpaper-bookrampantpiracyproblem,itcanprotectthebenefitsoftheauthor’sbetterthane-books.E-booksraisesthepopularityofpiracy.Althoughpeoplemayneedtopayfortheirdownloadingsomee-books,butinmorecases,theuseronlyneedclickhismouse.Andthewriterusuallygetlesspaymentfortheirbooks.Thepressoftenchoosetopublishrealbooksandjustprovideapartofthebookontheinternet,thuswecanbesurethatpaper-booksgivethepressandtheirwritersmuchmorereturnthane-books.反方三辩：现在的盗版书猖獗，一样没有版权提问：电子书携带方便，传播方便，纸质书就做不到。Nowpiratedbooksisalsorampant,thereisnocopyrighttoo.E-bookscanbeeasytocarryforreadinganytime,e-booksisfarmoreconvenientthanpaper-books.二辩：纸质书也可以携带方便随时阅读，电子书没电了一样不能看提问：纸质书可以标注，便于阅读理解，电子书功能不够完善Paperbookscanalsoeasytocarryforreadinganytime,whenEbookisoutofelectricity,italsocannotread.Whenwearereadingarealbook,wecanlineaparagraphweareinterestedinconveniently,whichhelpsusalotinunderstandingandrememberingtheknowledgeweneed.Butwhenreadinge-books,wehavetobuildanewfileoruseanotebook,it’sveryinconvenientforus反方一辩：电子书一样可以标注，很多文档软件都有标注功能，更多样化提出：纸质书有环保问题E-bookscanbeannotatedveryconvenientalso,alotofdocumentsoftwarehavethisfunction,therearemorediversified.Paperbooksmaycauseenvironmentalproblems.三辩：纸质书可以回收利用，环保问题可以解决，电子书所用的电子产品的制造和处理也同样存在污染问题，不好解决Althoughpaper-bookshaveapollutionproblem,theelectricproductsthate-booksusemaycausemorepollutionproblemsthanpaper-makingprogress,whentheelectricproductsaremadeorabandoned,theymaypollutetheenvironmentmorebadly反方二辩：纸质书需要花钱，有的书看一遍就不看了，花销大E-bookssavememuchtimeandmoney.Thankstothedevelopmentoftheinternetandthewideuseofpersonalcomputers,IcanhaveaccesstoalmostanybookIwantwithoutspendingmuchmoney.AsIknow,mostwebsitesprovidinge-booksarefreeofcharge,whilesomeofthemdoaskforalittlemoney,butthatisnothingcomparedwiththatspentonpaper-books.Also,Iwillnothavetowalkhalfanhourtoabookstoreorlibrary,especiallyinahotsummerday.AllwhatIhavetodoisthatopenmylaptopandtypeinthebooknameorkeywords,thenthesystemwilllistrelevantinformationonthescreenatthesametime,Icanreadremarksfromotherreaderstoseewhetherthebooksuitsmewell.二辩：电子书看上去便宜，但是真正有用的资源价格不菲，免费的只是网友的分享和一些没什么营养的小说提问：好的纸质书还可以收藏Itseemsthate-booksarecheaperthanpaper-books,buttheresourcesthatarereallyusefulisfarmoreexpensive.Thefreee-booksareusuallyuploadedbyotherpersonandsomenovelswhichhavelittlehelpeducatingorinspiringpeople.Another,paperbookhasthevalueofcollection,Forexample,youcouldthinkaboutthehardcover,itssignificanceandvalueisnotonlythecontentsofthebook,butalsothematerialcarrierandtheemotionsofcollectors.反方一辩：电子书存在各种存储设备中更方便收藏且容量空间大占地微小，不像纸质书需要弄个大书架收藏占空间提问：电子书翻页操作什么方便，阅读背景和格式等都可以个性化选择，电子书还需要手动翻页，且格式都固定好的，不易阅读二辩：看纸质书的过程本身是个享受墨香书香手动翻页的过程，电子书完全没有了读书的感觉Readingpaperbookisaprocessofenjoyinginkfragranceandelegantmanualfliping,e-booklosethefeelingofreadingcompletely反方二辩：我们并没有完全抹杀纸质书，我们只是强调电子书在诸多方面更先进快捷三辩总结陈词Dearteacherandoppositedebaber,thankstotheoppositedebaters'statement,now,itisthetimeformetodothesummaryaddress.ourdebatersadheretotheviewthate-bookcannotcompletelyreplacethepaperbookfromthebeginningtotheend,welistedtheadvantagesofpaperbooksinseveralaspects,suchasdepthreading,inheritingcivilization,publishingcopyrightandsoon.Andwefoundthatthee-bookshavemanyshortcomingsinreadinghabitslimit,healthkeeping,electroniccopyrightchaosandsoon.Fromthecomparison,wecanforeseethate-bookcannotcompletelyreplacethepaperbooksBesides.inthewayoftraditionalreading,thedevelopmentofelectronicreadingisnotonlyanopportunitybutalsoachallenge.Traditionalbooksisnotonlytheaccumulationofvisibletangibleforms,butalsotheconstantaccumulationofknowledge,itisarealsymbolofculturalheritageandspiritualtransfertool.E-bookisjustasupplementtotraditionalreading.Anditsdevelopmentisobviouslylimited.Thefastfoodcultureessenceofelectronicbooksleadingtothatitcanonlyundertaketransferringinformationalmaterial;Ontheotherhand,forsomeseriousorhighlyacademicprofessionalreadings,itisnotappropriatetobethereadingtool.Nowadays,e-bookispopular,someonemaychoosee-bookstoreadindailytime,butitisjustthespiceoftraditionalpaperbooksformostpeopleanditwillnotreplacethetraditionalpaperbooksinthefutureforalongtime.That’sall,thankyou.