对抗制与纠问制的区别

Q.howdoyoucomparetheadversarialsystemandtheinquisitorialsystemofjustice?对抗制是英美法系法庭辩护制度对抗制：（1）对抗的双方：A——民事案件中的原告，刑事案件中的公诉人；B——被告律师；（2）对抗的方式：提出各自的证据；询问己方证人；盘问对方证人；相互辩论；（3）法官的角色——不主动调查，消极的仲裁人A——主持开庭；B——对双方的动议和异议做出裁决；纠问制是大陆法系的审判制度，他是由法官承担主导角色，控制审判进程，提出问题，对事实做出判断。对抗制与纠问制的区别1.是不同法系的法庭辩护制度2.产生的历史时期和社会背景不同。纠问式诉讼是君主专制的产物；而对抗式诉讼则是奴隶制民主共和和封建制初期的产物。3.法官的职能不同。4.被告人的法律地位不同。在纠问式诉讼中，被告人只是诉讼的客体，只能被迫究，被处罚，没有任何诉讼地位；而在对抗制诉讼中，双方当事人地位平等，各自都有控辩的权利。5.审讯的形式不同。纠问制诉讼是采取秘密的，刑讯逼供合法化；而对抗制诉讼则是实行审判公开、“不告不理’的诉讼原则。Theadversarysystemisacommonlawcourtdefensesystemadversarialsystem：(1)againstthetwosides:A-plaintiffinAcivilcase,theprosecutorincriminalcases;B-thedefendantlawyer;(2)againsttheway:Putforwardtheirownevidence;Questiontheirownwitnesses;Askeachotherthewitness;Thedebateeachother;(3)theroleofajudge,notactiveinvestigation,negativerefereeA-chairedthehearing;B-tomakeadecisiononbothsidesofthemotionanddissent;InquisitorialsystemItisthejudgmentofthecivillawsystem,andheisbornebythejudgedominantrole,controltrialprocess,askquestions,tojudgethefact.Thedifferencebetweentheadversarialsystemandtheinquisitorialsystem1.Theyaredifferentgenealogyoflawofthecourtsystemofadvocacy.2.Theresultindifferenthistoricalperiodsandsocialbackground.Inquisitorialsystemistheproductoftheabsolutemonarchy;adversarialsystemistheproductofaslaverydemocraticrepublicandthebeginningofthefeudalsystem.3.Thefunctionofthejudgeisdifferent.4.Thelegalstatusofthedefendantisdifferent.Intheinquisitorialsystem,thedefendantistheobjectoflitigation,wereforcedtoinvestigate,bepunished,nolitigationstatus;Andintheadversarialsystem,thepartieshaveequalstatus,eachhavetherightsofthedefendant.5.Differentformofthehearing.Thesecretsofinquisitoriallitigationsystemwastaken,legalizedtorture;Theadversarialsystemlawsuitisapublictrial,nottoignore'principlesoflitigation.