霸权与帝国-两种不同的组织形态与逻辑

512Vol.51No.220113JilinUniversityJournalSocialSciencesEditionMar．2011□。。。、。。“”。、。07JJDGJW252201010152010－12－10。13001220。1012“”“”“”。、。。“”“”“”。《》“”“”“”。31818－1819·87·“。”4120。、“”514。。《》“”。、、。62002《》7。Hegemony。8319“”“”。。“”“”、、。20、。。。。9246《》。《》“”“”。“”。。。。“‘’。”9262·“。。”101055000。“。”11134、“、、、”。12306－307、·97·“”。。·。、、。。13。。1446－47。。。“”。“”“、、、”1522。。“”“”“、、”“”。16。“”“”。17。。—、。。“”183。。。。。、、。。“”。“”。、、。·08·“。。”19235。。“”1332。“”2083。·“continualdialogue”2115。··“”。。。22159。“”。、“”。、。。。。。·“。”2398。。。、。。。。。。。。。、、。24611。。。、·18·。。“”。“、。。”25205。、、。。。。“。”26147。。。。。“‘’。”25181。。。。“”27204。。。、。。。。·“19911231。3000。。”28“”。29·“”30298。。、、·28·1945。、、。24。hegemonicgovernancemilitarism。31。。··《》。“、。”321。“、。、、。”3241“”。、、、。“、”3241。·、。、。《》“”。。“。”33169。。。。“”“”“”“”“”“”。1《“”》《》20024。2《》《》20103。3《》1979。4《·》1995。5、《》2009。6《》1980。·38·7·K．《》··、·K．《5005000》2004。8《》1992。9·《》2000。10·W．《、》2004。11·K．、··《》··、·K．《5005000》2004。12·《》《》、2003。13·《》、2007。14·、·《》2002。15《》52002。16《》《》20033。17《“”》《》20044。18·《———》1998。19·《》、2000。20《》2008。21WatsonA．TheEvolutionofInternationalSocietyAComparativeHistoricalAnalysisLondonandNewYorkRout-ledge1992．22·、·《———》2004。23·《201919—1939———》2005。24IkenberryGJ．LiberalismandEmpireLogicsofOrderintheAmericanUnipolarAgeReviewofInternationalStud-ies2004304．25·《———》2002。26··《》2007。27《》1994。28SzporlukR．AfterEmpireWhatDaedalus1994123321－39．29·《》、2008。30·《》、2009。31GolubPS．ImperialPoliticsImperialWillandtheCrisisofUSHegemonyReviewofInternationalPoliticalEcono-my2004114．32·、·《》、2003。33·、·《》·、·《21》2004。·48·ABSTRACTS“SurvivalWisdomMode”ReviewingtheResearchesofCivilSocietyinChinaDENGZheng-laiAbstractIntheaspectoftheresearchesofacivilsociety“survivalwisdommode”hasabasicpresuppositionthatthecivilsocialorganizationmighthasan“unintendedexpansion”atthemomentduetothebenefitdifferentiationgovernmentmalfunctionespeciallythe“limitofrationality”inthepoliticalsystemitself．ButinpracticegraduallyduetoitsChineseunique“survivalwisdom”ademocratictran-sitionalmodemaybeformedwhichmatcheswith“Chinesevisionofanidealsociety”．Keywordssystemofdifferentialcontrols“unintendedresults”survivalwisdomInResponsetoHeidegger’sCommentonMarx“TheoryofMan”HowcanWeGetoutoftheDangerofSelf-destructionCausedbyHumanSelf-productionSUNLi-tianSHIQing-zhuAbstractHeideggerdeclaredinseminarsofhislateyearsthathumanself-productionwouldleadtothedangerofself-destruction．HerelatedhisideaswithMarx’stheoryofmanandcriticizedMarx’stheory．InMarx’sopiniononlybeyondthecontrolofcapitallogiccanhumanavoidthedangerofself-destruction．Inthisprocessmanistheessenceofthematter．ThepaperdefendsMarxinthecontextofHeideggerbutunderstandsMarxbeyondHeidegger’sthoughts．KeywordsMarxHeideggerhuman-selfproductionpriortyofhumancapitallogicThetwoChineseLanguageTeachingMaterialsundertheBackgroundofBeijingMandarinintheLateNineteenthCenturyinKoreaZHANGMei-lanAbstractTheoverseasChineselearninginthelate19thcenturyfocusedonBeijingMandarin．ThelinguisticfoundationofthetwoChineseteachingmaterialsHuayinQimengYanjieandNiNeGuixingusedinSouthKorearevealsthefeaturesoftheoverseasChinesetextbooksatthattime．Notonlywerethe25spokenwordsfoundinthedocumentsintheMingandtheQingDynastiesespeciallyinthelateQingbuttheyarestillwidelyusedinMandarinofNortheastChinatoday．ItprovesthatBeijingMandarinhasvernacularfeatureswhichcouldbeinheritedandinteractivelydynamicincommunication．KeywordsHuayinQimengYanjieNiNeGuixingSpokenWordsLinguisticfeaturesBeijingMandarinMandarinofNortheastChinaHegemonyandEmpireTwoKindsofOrganizationalFormsandLogicsLIUDe-binSUNXing-jieAbstractEmpireandhegemonyareformsoforganizationsaswellastwoevolutionarylogicsofIn-ternationalRelations．Inthelonghistorythetwokindsofformsandlogicsappearedinteractivelyandpresentedatrendthatanempirewouldconverttohegemony．Anempireisanorganizationalunitaswellasaninternationalsystemwhilehegemonyisaninternationalsystemwithadynamicequilibrium．The·951·complexrelationshipbetweenthetwoindicatesthecomplexityandvarietyofevolvinginternationalrela-tions．Scholarsinthepost-ColdWarputtheideaofempireondebatesagainwhiletheresistanceandtherevolttohegemonyindifferentcountriesandgroupsofcountriesmadehegemonytobeaconceptwithstrongpoliticalmeanings．Althoughthefastchanginginternationalrelationspromotedsomanypredictionsandcriterionofthescholarsthe“shadows”ofempireandhegemonyarestilltheretoarguewiththenewconcepts．Itwillbehelpfultofurtherclarifythetwooldandambiguousconceptstoavoidsimplifiedun-derstandingespeciallytofindoutthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthetwoconceptsandtheircul-turalmeanings．Inthiswaywenotonlycangetabetterunderstandingaboutthechangesofinternationalrelationsinthepastbutalsomakewisejudgmentsonthecurrentandfutureworldaffairs．KeywordsHegemonyEmpireInternationalhistoryNewKeynesianPhillipsCurveinthePost-FinancialCrisisEraEstimationEconomicPolicyandImplicationsLIUJin-quanJIANGMei-huaAbstractPhillipscurvemechanismplaysanimportantroleinjudgingmacro-economicsituationandeconomicpolicy-making．TheGMMisusedtoestimatetheempiricalnewKeynesPhillipscurveinChinaandtheresultshowsthattheoutput-priceofnewKeynesPhillipscurveindeedexistsinCh