A Study in Process Simplification

整理文档很辛苦,赏杯茶钱您下走!

免费阅读已结束,点击下载阅读编辑剩下 ...

阅读已结束,您可以下载文档离线阅读编辑

资源描述

StudiesinProcessSimplificationAshokDandekarDewayneE.PerryLawrenceG.VottaFujitsuNetworkSoftwareProductionResearchSoftwareProductionResearchCommunications,Inc.BellLaboratoriesBellLaboratoriesRichardsonTX75082MurrayHillNJ07974NapervilleIL60566A_Dandekar@fujitsu-fnc.comdep@research.bell-labs.comvotta@research.bell-labs.comAbstractOneofthemajorproblemswithsoftwaredevelopmentprocessesistheircomplexity.Hence,oneoftheprimarymotivationsinprocessimprovementisthesimplificationofthesecomplexprocesses.Wereportasetofstudiestoexplorevarioussimplificationapproachesandtechniques.Weusedtheavailableprocessdocumentation,questionnairesandinterviews,andasetofprocessvisualizationtoolfragments(pfv)togainanunderstandingoftheprocessunderexamination.Wethenusedthreebasicanalysistechniquestolocatecandidatesforsimplificationandimprovement:valueaddedanalysis,timeusageanalysis,andalternativesanalysis.Allthreeapproachesprovedeffectiveinisolatingproblemareasforimprovement.Theproposedsimplificationsresultedinasavingsof20%incost,20%inhumaneffort,40%inelapsetime,anda30%reductioninthenumberofactivities.1.IntroductionandOverviewTheprocesssystemthatisthecontextofourstudycameintobeingasaresultofamanagementedict(theyhadheardthatprocesseswereagoodthingandthattheyoughttobedefined).This‘‘goodthing’’beganwithvariouspeopleandgroupsdefiningtheprocesstheywereresponsibleformoreorlessinisolationfromalltheotherprocessesbeingdefined.Theseprocessesthengrewandevolvedinanunmanagedfashion,dueprimarilytothelackofeffectivemanagementoftheprocesssystemarchitecture.Thisunmanageabilitywasthenexacerbatedbythemergeroftwoprocesssystemsforsimilarproducts.In[6],[7]and[11]wereportedourexperienceintryingtounderstandthecurrentstateofthisprocesssystemanditsarchitecture.Oneoftheunderlyingrootcausesofthecurrentstateofboththesystemanditsarchitectureisthecomplexityoftheprocesses(boththeirinherentcomplexityandthecomplexityoftheirvisualizations).Therearetwofactorsthatcontributetosystemcomplexity:theexceedinglylargenumberofinteractionsamongtheprocessesandtheexceedinglylargenumberandwidevarietyofartifactsexchangedamongtheseprocesses.Factorsanalogoustothesecontributetothecomplexityofindividualprocesses:thenumberofinteractionsamongprocesselements,thenumberandvarietyofartifactsexchangedamongtheprocesselements,andthecontoursofthevariouspathsthroughtheprocess.Inthispaperwereportasetofstudiesinwhichourgoalistosimplifyaspecificprocess—thatis,tounderstandandresolvetheproblemsofinternalcomplexity.Wechosesimplificationratherthanre-engineeringasourapproachforseveralreasons.First,simplificationiseasiertodothanre-engineeringandismuchsmallerinitsscope.Second,wewantedtoseewhatcouldbegainedbythisapproachasanexamplefortheotherprocesssubsystems.Andthird,itwasourintuitionthattherewasmuchtobegainedintermsofcomplexity,costandintervalreductionwithoutgoingtothelengthsoffull-scalere-engineering.Ourintuitionshaveproventobecorrect.Ourcriteriaforchoosingaparticularprocesssubsystemwere•theprocessneededtobecustomerfocused,•theprocessneededtohaveknownproblems,and•thepeopleusingtheprocessesneededtobewillingtoparticipateinthestudy.Onthebasisofthesecriteria,wechosethecustomerdocumentationprocessesasthetrialstudyprocessesandwithinthatsetofprocessesthenewdocumentsprocessasthespecificfocus.Wethenspentabout4monthsmeetingweeklytodetermineappropriatesimplificationsandimprovements,andconcurrently,buildingthesupportingempiricalbaselineandtechnologyinfrastructure.Duringthisperiodweusedthreedifferentexperimentaltechniquesinouriterativeapproachtogaininginsightandunderstanding.Inthefollowingsectionsweintroduceourphilosophicalapproachtoprocessimprovement,delineatethescopeofthestudy,discussoureffortstounderstandtheprocesses,summarizeourstudiesandtheirresults,anddistilltheinsightsandlessonswelearned.2.TheApproachWeFoundUsefulWeusedabasicstraightforwardprocessimprovementparadigminwhichweiterativelybuildourunderstandingoftheprocessanditscontext,cost,qualityandintervalcharacteristics,thesupportingtechnology,andthevariousalternativeimprovements.Weclassifytheexperimentaltechniquesthatweusetobuildthisunderstandingintotwoclasses:retrospectiveandprospective.Retrospectivetechniquesusevariousexistinglegacydocumentsanddata,aswellasvariousformsofpersonalandgroupexperiencereports.Prospectivetechniquesusevariousformsofproactivedatagatheringandexperimentstogaindetailedunderstandingofcost,qualityandintervalfactors,aswellasvariousprocesscontrolfactors(thatis,causalconnectionsamongprocesselements).OnecommontechniqueforstudyingprocessesisGQM(Goal,Question,Metric)[2].Thisisprimarilyaformalizationoftheempiricalparadigmtailoredtounderstandingsoftwareproductsandprocesses.Assuchitisprimarilyprospectiveandnotretrospective.Sinceunderstandingtheprocessbeforeimprovingitisfundamental[12]andsinceretrospectivestudiescansupplyalargedegreeofunderstandingatverylowexperimentalcost,theGQMapproachdidnotseemappropriatefortheproblemsweaddressed.Thus,inouriterationsovervariousaspectsofthestudiedprocessweuseamixtureofretrospectiveandprospectivestudies.3.TheScopeoftheStudyThecustomerdoc

1 / 25
下载文档,编辑使用

©2015-2020 m.777doc.com 三七文档.

备案号:鲁ICP备2024069028号-1 客服联系 QQ:2149211541

×
保存成功