第一篇:Moderntechnologyhasgreatlyinfluencedpeople’swayofentertainment,makingpeoplelesscreative.Doyouagreeordisagree?Neverinpasthistoryhastechnologymadesomuchinfluenceonpeople’slifestyleincludingpeople’swayofentertainment,workingthatpeopleseemsdietandsoverwhelmedbytheonslaughtofthetechnology.Somepeoplethusputforwardtheiropinionthatpeoplebecomelessinnovativethanbeforeowingtothetechnologyprogress.Iam,however,againstthisunfoundedview.Tobeginwith,people’well-beinghasbeenremarkablyimprovedwiththeadventofmoderntechnologyandtheirlifestylehasalsoundergoneenormouschangesespeciallyintheareaofentertainment.Inthepast,therecreationalactivitiesforthemasswereveryrareandhumdrumsothatpeoplehavenochoicebuttochatwiththeirneighbors,readnewspapersordanceintheplaygroundafterwork.Nowadaysthewayofentertainmenthasbecomediversifiedandstimulating,enablingpeopletobetteradjustandrelaxthem.Takethelatestoutcomeofmoderntechnology,iPad,forexample.ThereareavastnumberofintriguingAPPsiniPadinventedbyAppleIncwhichallowyoutogoshoppingonTaobao,thelargestonlineshoppingplatforminChinaoryoucanalsowatchanamusingvideoclipinYoukuwhichissomethingsimilartoYouTube.Ingeneral,moderntechnologycontributeshugelytothetransformationinpeople’swayofentertainment.Howeverthereisnoconcreteevidenceindicatingthefactthatpeople’sinnovativeabilityhasbeencrippledwiththedevelopmentofmoderntechnology.Instead,theimaginationandinspirationhiddeninsidehumanbrainarearousedowingtotheproductsofthemoderntechnology.AcaseinpointistheMacBookPromadebyAppleInc.Itiseasierforarchitecttodesignandobservethebuildingmodelinathree-dimensionalspacewithfabulousvisualeffectpresentedbyMacBookProandthereforearchitectand’simaginationinnovationcanbemadeintosomeuniqueandextraordinarybuildings.Tosumup,peopleareblessedwithmoderntechnologywhichenrichestheirlifeinallaspectsincludingthewayofentertainment.Nevertheless,theviewthatmoderntechnologyleadstopeoplewithlesscreationhasbeenuntenableduetolackofstrongevidence.Ingeneral,moderntechnologyisconduciveratherthandetrimentaltothesocialprogressandhumanprogress.第二篇:Thegovernmentshouldcontroltheamountofviolenceinfilmsandontelevisioninordertoreducetheamountofviolentcrimesinthesociety.Doyouagreeordisagree?Sincetheimplementationofthereformandopening-uppolicy,Chinahasundergoneenormoussocialchangesoverthepastthirty-sevenyearsinanall-roundwayincludingeconomy,cultureandotheraspects.Meanwhile,withChina’sopeningtotheoutsideworld,avastnumberoffilmshavebeenintroducedtoChina,allowingtheChinesepeopletoenjoymoreextraordinaryfilms.However,somepeoplearguethatamongthosemoviesimportedfromotherdevelopedcountriesandregionsespeciallyfromAmericaandHongKong,therearenumeroussplatterfilmswhichcontainavastamountofviolenceleadingtotheincreaseinviolentcrimesinthesociety.Iam,certainly,sidewiththisview.Inthefirstplace,theincreaseinjuveniledelinquencyshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenweapproachthisissue.Itisreportedthatthejuveniledelinquencyhasseenarisingtrendinrecentyearsandmanyofthosestudentswhohavecommittedacrimeadmittedthattheyhavewatchedalotofsplatterfilms.Itseemsnaturalthatwiththeadventofsplatterfilms,thosefilmsaremoreaccessibletomodernteenagersandmanyofthemareinclinedtomimicsomeviolentbehaviorsinthosefilmsbecauseteenagersusuallylackmentalmaturity.Therefore,theyaremorelikelytorespectandadmiretheviolentrolesinthefilmwhohascommittedalargenumberofcrimesandregardthoserolesastheirrolemodel.Ingeneral,thegovernmentmusttakemeasurestocontroltheamountofviolenceinfilmsandtelevisionsoastocutdowntheamountofviolentcrimes,notablythejuveniledelinquencyinthesociety.Ontheotherhand,itisquitedebatabletoconcludethattheviolenceinfilmsandontelevisionisthesoledrivingforcebehindtheincreaseinviolentcrimesinthesociety.Itmustbeadmittedthatschoolsalsoplayacrucialroleineducatingthetheirstudentstobeandisciplinedandlaw-abidingcitizensinsteadofmerelyfocusingontheiracademicperformances.Tosumup,inordertocutdowntheamountofviolentcrimesinsocietygovernmentshouldshouldertheresponsibilitytocontroltheamountofviolenceinfilmsandontelevision.Inalargesense,notonlygovernmentbutalsoschoolsandotherinstitutionsshouldalsobeartheresponsibilitytoreducetheviolentcrimeinthesociety.第三篇:Somesaythatstudentswithsimilaracademicabilitiesshouldbeputinoneclass.Othersbelieveaclassshouldincludestudentswithdifferentacademicperformances.Discuss.Neverinhistoryhaseducationbeenplacedsomuchemphasisasinmodernsociety.Recentyearshavewitnessedfrequenteducationalreformswhichareaimedatimprovingthequalityofeducationandprovidingstudentswithbetterlearningenvironment.Forexample,inthepast,studentswithsimilaracademicperformancesareusuallyputinoneclass;nowadays,moreandmoreschoolsarepronetotheclassofstudentswithdifferentacademicperformances.AsfarasIcansee,boththosemethodsarereasonableandthestrengthandweaknessofthemshouldbetakenintoconsiderationwhenweapproachthisissue.Firstofall,thosewhoareinfavorofputtingstudentswithdifferentacademicperformancesinoneclassarguethatthismethodisconducivetotheeducationalequalityamongallthestudents,whichmeetsthedemandofmostparents.Itshouldbenoti