7.-The-whip-speeches

Theformatandstrategiesofthewhipspeeches黄山学院王巧Patternofawhipspeech•refutation•summaryWhipspeeches:summariesofclashes•provideanhonestandaccuratecomparisonofthetwosides•supportyourside•highlightyourteam'scontributionconvincejudgesofonething–thatallthegoodargumentscamefromyourmember•Ontheotherhand,don'tignorewhatwassaidinthefirsthalfofthedebate.weakening√knifing×Note:NOnewargumentsshouldbegiven•TheGovernmentWhip•√newexamplesthatsupportexistingarguments•×newarguments•TheOppositionWhip•×anynewmaterialwhatsoeverdiscountedignoredWhataretheclashesinthefollowingdebate?THWlegalizeorgansales.proposition1.Morepeoplewhoareinneedoftransplantableorganswillbesaved.2.Theblackmarketwillbeeffectivelydiminished.3.Technologyconcerningorgantransplantationwillbepromoted.4.Morelaborforcecanbeguaranteed.5.There'sblackcaseworkundercurrentstatusquo.opposition1.Organremovalcauseshealthproblemorevendeathtoproviders.2.Theblackmarketwillflurishduetothispolicy.3.Poorpeoplewon'tbeabletoaffordtheorgans.4.Humantraffickingwillflurishduetothispolicy.5.Humanbodycannotbetreatedasgoods.THWlegalizeorgansales.proposition1.Morepeoplewhoareinneedoftransplantableorganswillbesaved.2.Theblackmarketwillbeeffectivelydiminished.3.Technologyconcerningorgantransplantationwillbepromoted.4.Morelaborforcecanbeguaranteed.5.There'sblackcaseworkundercurrentstatusquo.opposition1.Organremovalcauseshealthproblemorevendeathtoproviders.2.Theblackmarketwillflurishduetothispolicy.3.Poorpeoplewon'tbeabletoaffordtheorgans.4.Humantraffickingwillflurishduetothispolicy.5.Humanbodycannotbetreatedasgoods.clashpoints•consequence:•whetherthispolicydosegoodorharmtoindividuals•whetherthispolicydosegoodorharmtosocietywhetherblackmarketcanbediminishedornotwhetherequalitycanbeguaranteedTHWbancosmeticsurgery.proposition1.Thesurgeryisrisky.2.Itinfluencesfamilymembersandotheryoungpeople.3.Inequalitybetweenrichandpooriscausedbycosmeticsurgery.4.Theconfidencebroughtaboutbythesurgeryisfalseconfidence.5.Cosmeticsurgerygiveswantedcriminalsmorechancestorunaway.opposition1.Itisapersonalchoice.2.Blackmarketwillflurishduetothepolicy.3.Thosewhoundergosurgeriesgetmorechances.4.Thosewhoundergosurgeriesgainconfidence.5.Unemploymentratemayriseduetothepolicy.6.Itpromotstechnologydevelopment.THWbancosmeticsurgery.proposition1.Thesurgeryisrisky.2.Itinfluencesfamilymembersandotheryoungpeople.3.Inequalitybetweenrichandpooriscausedbycosmeticsurgery.4.Theconfidencebroughtaboutbythesurgeryisfalseconfidence.5.Cosmeticsurgerygiveswantedcriminalsmorechancestorunaway.opposition1.Itisapersonalchoice.2.Blackmarketwillflurishduetothepolicy.3.Thosewhoundergosurgeriesgetmorechances.4.Thosewhoundergosurgeriesgainconfidence.5.Unemploymentratemayriseduetothepolicy.6.Itpromotstechnologydevelopment.clashpoints•principle:isitjustifiedtointervene•consequence:whethercosmeticsurgerybringsaboutmoreharmormorebenefitTHWpreferaworldwherepeoplecannotlie.proposition1.Lyingisbad.2.Lyingleadstodistrust.3.Thecrimeratemustbeverylowinsuchaworld.4.Peoplewouldbehappierinthatworld.opposition1.Whiteliesarenecessarysometimes.2.Theskillstolieandtodetectliespromotementalgrowth.3.Lifewouldbemoremiserable.4.Economywilldecline.THWpreferaworldwherepeoplecannotlie.proposition1.Lyingisbad.2.Lyingleadstodistrust.3.Thecrimeratemustbeverylowinsuchaworld.4.Peoplewouldbehappierinthatworld.opposition1.Whiteliesarenecessarysometimes.2.Theskillstolieandtodetectliespromotementalgrowth.3.Lifewouldbemoremiserable.4.Economywilldecline.clashpoints•principle:whetherlyingisgoodorbad•consequence:whetherlifewithoutlyingisgoodorbadAssumingfeasibility,ThisHousewouldallowsoldierstoremovetheirabilitytofearpermanently.proposition1.Soldierscantrainbetter.2.Soldierscanperformbetter.3.Armywillbemoreeffective.4.Itisapersonalchoice.5.Soldiersmayfindlifeinarmymoreenjoyable.opposition1.There'snoremedy.2.Itmayincreasecasualtyrate.3.Soldierswithoutfeararenothumananymore.4.Itwillcausementaldisorder.5.Itwillcauseinstability.Assumingfeasibility,ThisHousewouldallowsoldierstoremovetheirabilitytofearpermanently.proposition1.Soldierscantrainbetter.2.Soldierscanperformbetter.3.Armywillbemoreeffective.4.Itisapersonalchoice.5.Soldiersmayfindlifeinarmymoreenjoyable.opposition1.There'snoremedy.2.Itmayincreasecasualtyrate.3.Soldierswithoutfeararenothumananymore.4.Itwillcausementaldisorder.5.Itwillcauseinstability.clashpoints•priciple:isitjustifiedtograntthemthechoice•consequence:•whetheritdosegoodorharmtothesoldiers•whetheritdosegoodorharmtothearmyFundamentalquestionstoconsiderinBPdebate•Willthisplanachieveitsgoal?•Whatisthepourposeofgovernment?•Whatisthefunctionofpubliceducation?•Whatisthepropergoalofdoctors?•Whatarelegitimateendsofforeignintervention?•Whatisthpurposeofpunishingcriminals?•Howdowedeterminewhenanactionofthistypeiswarranted?•Whatwillhappenifwedonothing?•Whoisthebestactortoaddressthisproblem?•Whicharegreater,theadvantagesoftheplanorthedisadvantages?•Areweobligedtotakeaction?•Isreducingharmsimportantevenifthoseharmscan'tbecompletelyeliminated?•Iscausingsomeharmworthwhilegivenaneces