should-we-have-national-parks

Shouldwehavenationalparks?Tobeginwith,nationalparksarenecessaryinthattheycanprotectthevarietyofspeciesandhelpuslearnabouttheenvironment.Nevertheless,someonearguedthatexplorationofthenationalparksisdamagingtotheenvironment.So,shouldwehavenationalparks?Herearesomeconcreteopinionsformbilateralstandpoint.Peoplewhoopposeestablishingnationalparksholdtheviewthatwildareasshouldnotbedisturbed.Theybelievedthatthebestwaytomaintainecologicalbalanceistokeepnatureintheraw.Itisnotreasonabletocirclearangeoflandforprotection.Theystronglyappealtocomplywithwildworldandactivelyrespectitslawratherthancommandit.Howevertherebuttalputforwarddeemsthattheestablishmentofnationalparksaimstoprovideasafehomefornativeplantsandanimals.Withoutnecessaryprotection,somerareanimalssuchasrhinosbecomeeasytargetofpoachers.Besides,nationalparksusuallybaseonoriginalenvironmentandformedwithhundredsofaboriginallandscape.Thoseartificialbuildingsandfacilitiesarejustaddedforconvenience.Inthisrespect,establishingnationalparksdoesnotconsortwithnaturallaws.Anotherargumentofantisinsiststhatexplorationofthenationalparksisdamagingtotheenvironment.Constructionsarebondtocauseimpact.Asacounter,supportersrefutethatreasonableexplorationcannotonlyprotectbiodiversity,butalsohelppeoplelearnmoreabouttheenvironment.Landscaperesourceinnationalparkswhichhasshownrarityandspecificityisplayingasignificantrolearoundtheworld.Whetherweshouldhavenationalparksisacontroversialtopicallthetime.Recentyearsanincreasingnumberofpeoplebelievethataslongaswemakegooduseofnationalparkstoprotectplantsandanimals,bothenvironmentandhumanbeginscanbenefitalotfromthem,sodoI.周思佳156001208