上汽乘用车公司潜在供应商评审表

SM-P-2801-3第1页共15页PotentialSupplierAssessment潜在供应商评审表BBWBSUPPLIERDATA供应商资料ASSESSMENTDATA评审资料Name名称:AssessmentDate评审日期:Address地址:Assessedby评审人:Commodity：零件类别Chem化工类Elec电器类Met金属类PT发动机AssessorPhoneNo.评审员电话:Product产品:PhoneNo.电话:FaxNo.传真:OverallRatingScore得分率：______SupplierContacts:联系人Position:职位:Result评审结果:____________SQEManger批准：Approvedby批准：RESULTS评审结果Questions问题N/A不适用项PointScoreCorrectiveActionO/L-DateNo.Element要素分数评审建议&总分统计1ManagementResponsibility管理职责4评审建议：2QualitySystem质量体系103ContractReview合同评审14DesignControl设计控制45Purchasing采购66ProductIdentificationandTraceability产品标识及可追溯性17ProcessControl过程控制148InspectionandTesting检验和试验59Inspection,MeasuringandTestEquipment检验，测量和试验设备410ControlofNonconformingProduct不合格品的控制211CorrectiveandPreventiveAction预防和纠正措施312Handling,Storage,PackagingandDelivery搬运，储存，包装及交付413InternalQualityAudits内部质量审核4评审总分：应得总分：百分比：14ProductQualityandDeliveryPerformance产品质量和供货业绩515Training培训416TechanialAssessment(BlackBox)技术评审(BB)(7)Total总计78注：评审总分为实际得分；应得总分为除不适用项项数*5分满分的理想得分；百分比为评审得分/应得总分的比率SM-P-2801-3第2页共15页POTENTIALSUPPLIERASSESSMENTREPORT潜在供应商评审报告MANAGEMENTRESPONSIBILITY管理职责ELEMENT1要素1问题Question评审员记录AssessorNotes得分Score1.1供方是否使用正式的形成文件的全面的业务计划，包括短期和长期目标和计划？Doesthesupplierutilizeaformal,documented,comprehensivebusinessplanthatincludesshort-termandlonger-termgoalsandplan(s)?1.2对从事与质量有关的管理，执行及验证工作的人员是否规定了他们的职责，权限和相互关系,并形成了文件？Hastheresponsibility,authority,interrelationshipofallpersonnelwhomanage,performandverifyworkaffectingqualitybeendefinedanddocumented?1.3数据和资料的发展趋势是否与下列几个方面进行比较？Aretrendsindataandinformationcomparedwith:业务目标的实现,并转化为可操作的信息以支持:Progresstowardbusinessobjectives,toleadtoappropriateactiontosupport:优先解决与顾客相关的问题?developmentprioritiesforresolvingcustomerproblems?确定关键的与顾客相关的趋势determinationofkeycustomerrelatedtrends?竞争对手Competitors;适当的目标厂家Appropriatebenchmarks.1.4FinancialStability.财务状况CreditRating.信用等级暂不评分TOTALELEMENTSCORE要素总分QUALITYSYSTEM质量体系ELEMENT2要素2问题Question评审员记录AssessorNotes得分Score2.11、是否已获得VDA6.1、QS9000、ISO/TS16949第三方的质量体系认证？HasthesupplieracquiredVDA6.1,QS9000,ISO/TS16949orotherthirdpartqualitysystemcertifications?2.2质量手册的每个要素是否都有足够的程序文件(第二层次)支持?Arethereadequatesupportingprocedures(level2)foreachelementofthequalitymanual?SM-P-2801-3第3页共15页2.3质量策划过程是否与质量体系的所有其它要求相一致,并以适当的形式形成文件,是否适当考虑了与下列活动有关的质量体系要素:Isthequalityplanningprocessconsistentwithallotherrequirementsofthequalitysystem,documentedinasuitableformat,anddoesitconsiderasappropriatetheelementsofthequalitysystemthataddress:Identificationandacquisitionofallinspection&production/serviceresources?确定并配备所有检验和生产/服务所需的资源？Conductingdesignandprocessfeasibilitystudies?进行设计和过程可行性的研究？Updatingandmaintenanceofallqualitycontrolandinspectionmethodology?更新并保持所有质量控制和检测手段？Identificationofsuitableverificationatappropriatestages?确定在适当阶段进行合适的验证？Production,installationandservicingprocesseswhichdirectlyaffectquality.直接影响质量的生产，装配和服务过程？PreparationofcontrolplansandFMEA’s?制定控制计划和失效模式及后果分析(FMEAs)？Reviewofstandardsandspecifications?标准和规范评审？2.4在项目管理/先期质量策划方面是否具有足够的经验，并在项目实施过程中能有效的运用？DoesthesupplierhaveenoughAPQPexperienceandbecapableofimplementation?2.5在项目管理/先期质量策划方面是否具备足够的组织、人力资源和设施支持项目的实施？Doesthesupplierhavesufficientorganization,humanresourceandinfrastructureforAPQPtosupporttheprogram?2.6项目管理/先期质量质量策划的要求是否同样运用于其二次供应商？DoesthesupplierdemandAPQPforTierIIsupplier?2.7是否采用了适当的防错技术，应包括但不限于在过程,设施，设备和工装的策划及在解决问题过程中使用？Aremistakeproofingtechniquesutilizedwhereappropriate,whichincludebutarenotlimitedtoplanningofprocess,facilities,equipmentandtooling,andinproblemresolution?2.8控制计划是否按顾客要求包括了样件，试生产和生产三个阶段？Docontrolplanscoverthreephases:prototype,pre-launchandproduction,asrequiredbythecustomer?2.9当发生下列情况时,控制计划是否进行适当的评审和更新？Arecontrolplansreviewedandupdatedasappropriatewhenanyofthefollowingoccurs:Productorprocesschanges产品或过程变更？Processesarefoundtobeunstableornon-capable发现过程不稳定或能力不足？Inspectionmethod,frequency,etc.isrevised?检验方法,频次等发生改变？2.10是否有证据证明在质量(延伸至产品特性)，服务(时间安排和交付)和价格方面实施了持续改进以利于所有顾客?Isthereevidenceofcontinuousimprovementinquality(extendingtoproductcharacteristics),service(timinganddelivery)andprice,thatbenefitallcustomers?TOTALELEMENTSCORE要素总分SM-P-2801-3第4页共15页CONTRACTREVIEW合同评审ELEMENT3要素3问题Question评审员记录AssessorNotes得分Score3.1在签订生产某种新产品合同前,是否分析并确定了制造该产品的可行性，并形成文件(以小组可行性承诺形式)？Ismanufacturingfeasibilityinvestigated,confirmed,anddocumented,(teamfeasibilitycommitmentform)priortocontractingproposedproducts.TOTALELEMENTSCORE要素总分DESIGNCONTROL设计控制ELEMENT4要素4问题Question评审员记录AssessorNotes得分Score4.1如未经顾客声明放弃，是否具备下列条件：Dothefollowingexist,ifnotwaivedbythecustomer:Appropriateresourcesandfacilitiesavailabletousecomputeraideddesign,engineeringandanalysis?为开展计算机辅助设计，工程和分析工作提供适当的资源及设施？IfCAD/CAEissubcontracted,hasthesupplierprovidedtechnicalleadership?如果CAD/CAE被分包，供方是否提供技术支持？AreCAD/CAEsystemscapableoftwowayinterfacewithcustomersystems?CAD/CAE是否有能力与顾客的系统双向接口？DesignFEMAsforQualityassuranceintheproductdesign&CAE(analysis)results？是否针对产品设计及CAE分析结果进行DFMEA？4.2是否有记录证明在设计的适当阶段,由适当部门的人员按设计计划进行正式的文件化的设计评审？Arethererecordsofformaldocumenteddesignreviewsbytheappropriatefunctionsconducte