关于旧城更新中“社群自主治理”方式的探讨

上海交通大学硕士学位论文关于旧城更新中“社群自主治理”方式的探讨姓名：钱晓岚申请学位级别：硕士专业：公共管理指导教师：袁钢20080525MPAIMPAIIMPAIIITHERESEARCHOFCOMMUNITYSELFGOVERNANCEONINNERCITYRENEWALABSTRACTWithmanyinterestgroupsgrowingup,theinnercityrenewalinthecitiesisexperiencinggreatchallenges.Inonehand,renewalplansleadbygovernmentplaysignificantroleaspublicpolicies;ontheotherhand,gammingbetweengovernment,marketforceandpublicisbecomingmoreandmoreevident,whichdropsdeepeffectontheexecutionofurbanplan.Alltheabovehaveputforwardnewissuesofrationalityoftraditionalurbanplanmechanism.Thecentralissuesofthisthesisis:intheMarketEconomySystem,whenfacingsomelimitationsandvicesappearingintraditionalmechanismdominatedbythegovernmenthimself,canwefindsomewaystoremedythemsotoimprovetheefficientoftraditionalmechanism?Introduction:Beingtheintroductionofwholethesis,itintroducestheMPAIVresearchbackgroundandsignificanceofthissubject.Thenitsummarizesrelatedconceptsandinnovationpoints.The1stchapter:Itfocusesontheplightofpublicinterventionininnercityrenewal,pointingoutthatdifferentmeasurescannotrealizetheplanninggoalswell,andonthecontrarytheyresultinnegativesequelsasinefficientplanninginterventionandsocialunjustness.Whatismore,underpresentmechanism,macro-scoperenewalwhichhasbeenprovedharmfulisstillbeingcarriedon.The2ndchapter:Ittalksabouttheconceptsofsingle-centertheoryThenitanalyzeswhysingle-interestbalancedmechanismmeetschallenges.The3rdchapter:Ittalksabouttheconceptsofmulti-centertheory.ThenitpointsoutthetheoryofCommunitySelfGovernance.The4thchapter:BasingonthecasesofUSAitanalyzesthepracticingexperiencesofCommunitySelfGovernance.The5thchapter:ByreferingtorealitiesinmainlandofChina,itanalyzesthegapexistinginournation’scommunityplan.Finallyitpointsthepossiblemechanismdevelopingdirection.Conclusion:ItpointsoutthecurrentdevelopingdirectioninmainlandofChina.KEYWORDS:innercityrenewal,single-center,multi-center,goodgovernance,communityselfgovernanceMPA2MPA3MPA1MPA2123MPA3[1]123[1].[M].:,1994.23.MPA4[2]1234[2].[M].:2000.1511MPA5MPA61232005623[1][1].[N].2005-6-23(1-3).MPA7319971020002510125101MPA8[2]20026[2].[D].:,2003.MPA920027101MPA1020056231/3[3]200313.551991606020%7200[4]2004[3].[J].,2004,6:79-82[4].[J].,2004,6:79-82.MPA11200510%198019902001[5][5]..[6]10-1560-703000/2070-904000/20071932497626234[6].[D].:,1999.MPA13MPA14MPA1517.[7][7].[M].:,2000.3.MPA16[8][9]2-1[8].[M].:,2000.5.[9].[M].:,2000.9.MPA172-1MPA18[10][11][10],.:[M].:,2002.174-177.[11].[M].:,2000.10.MPA19[12]1233-13-2[12].[M].:,2003.173.MPA203-2:3-1MPA21[13][13].[M].:,2004.362.MPA22123456MPA23712345MPA241989crisisingovernance20902090[14][14].[J].,2002,156MPA25[15][16][15].[M].,2000,8.232[16].[J].,2002,(3)MPA2619781MPA27231234123MPA28[17]1950[17].[M]..1999.34.MPA29JonathonBarnettJonathonBarnett[18]1960[19]1965PaulDavidoffAdbocacyPlannningCityPlanningCommissiontelevisedplanning[18]..[M].:,1987.23-30.[19]RannaeHanson,JohnMcNamara.[M].:1998.22.MPA301970MPA31CommunityEmpowerment[20][21][20]PeterRobertsHughSykes.UrbanRegeneration:ahandbook[M]London:SAGEPublicationLtd.2000.259.[21]RogerL.Kemper.TheInnerCity-AHandbookofRenewal[M]Houston:McFarland&company,Inc.,2001.135-136.MPA321977NationalCommissiononNeighborhoods1979677MPA33[22][22],.[M].:2003.89-90.MPA34[23]5-1[23].[J].,1998,3:92.MPA355-1[24][25][24],.[J].,2003,19(3):59-69.[25].[J].1999,23(10):7.MPA36[26]123,[27][26],.[J].,2004,8:124.[27].[J].,2005,3:57.MPA37[28]19991996-1998[28].[M].:2003.18.MPA381949199935-1[29]:[29].[M].:,2004.81MPA39199660%NGONGONGONGOMPA40[30]NGO1234NGO12[30].[J].,2003,1:93.MPA413NGO[31]75%[31].[J].,2003,27(5):61.MPA42[32]1234[32],.[J].,2002,4:142MPA434MPA441234NGO12344[33][33].TransformationoftheTraditionalRoleofArchitectsintheHistoricSiteRenewal.22Istanbul2005,7.MPA45MPA46[1].[D].2001[2].[J].20056[3].[D].1991[4].[M].1999[5].[J].20023[6].[J].20026[7].[M].2003[8].[J].20056[9].[J].20014[10].[D].2003[11].[D].2003[12].[M].[13].[J].20018[14].[D].1999MPA47[15].[M].2005[16].[J].20013[17]..[18].[J].2003275[19].[J].20003[20].[J].19961[21]..2003[22].[M].2004[23].[J].20021[24].[M].2000[25]..[J].19962[26].[J].19964[27]..[28].20[J].200210[29].[M].MPA48[30].[M].[31].[M].[32]...[M].MPA49MPA50[1]..2008xx关于旧城更新中“社群自主治理”方式的探讨作者：钱晓岚学位授予单位：上海交通大学本文链接：授权使用：上海海事大学(wflshyxy)，授权号：e19600cb-f99d-4781-a4bd-9de50134ea33下载时间：2010年9月2日