日本公司治理模式

整理文档很辛苦,赏杯茶钱您下走!

免费阅读已结束,点击下载阅读编辑剩下 ...

阅读已结束,您可以下载文档离线阅读编辑

资源描述

TheCorporateGovernanceModelofJapan:ShareholdersarenotRulersFranklinAllenUniversityofPennsylvaniaandMengxinZhaoBentleyCollegeMay13,2007AbstractIntheU.S.andU.K.corporategovernanceisconcernedwiththenarrowgoalofensuringthatfirmsmaximizethewealthofshareholders.InJapanandsomeothercountries,firmsareconcernedwithabroadergroupofstakeholders,includingemployees,suppliers,customersandothersaswellasshareholders.ThisarticlecontraststheAnglo-AmericansystemofcorporategovernancewiththatinJapanandelsewhere.Ifmarketsandinstitutionsarewelldevelopedandcompetitive,Anglo-Americancorporategovernanceensuresanefficientallocationofresources.Inothercircumstances,focusingonawiderrangeofstakeholdersastheJapanesedocanbemoreefficient.1IntheU.S.andU.K.corporategovernanceisconcernedwithensuringthefirmisrunintheinterestsofshareholdersanditsobjectiveistocreatewealthforthem.UnderlyingthisviewofcorporategovernanceisAdamSmith'snotionoftheinvisiblehandofthemarketthathelaidoutinhisseminalbookTheWealthofNations.Iffirmsmaximizethewealthoftheirshareholdersandindividualspursuetheirownintereststhentheallocationofresourcesisefficientinthesensethatnobodycanbemadebetteroffwithoutmakingsomebodyelseworseoff.Inthisviewoftheworldtheroleofthefirminsocietyispreciselytocreatewealthforshareholders.ThisfundamentalideaisembodiedinthelegalframeworkintheU.S.andU.K.Inthesecountriesmanagershaveafiduciary(i.e.verystrong)dutytoactintheinterestsofshareholders.MuchofresearchineconomicsinthemorethantwocenturiessincethepublicationofTheWealthofNationsin1776hasbeenconcernedwithunderstandingwhentheinvisiblehandofthemarketworksandwhenitdoesnot.Therequirementsforittoworkarestrong.Theseincludeperfectandcompletemarketssothattherearenotransactionscostsorothersimilarfrictions.Theremustbenomissingmarketsorexternalitiessuchasthosearisingfrompollution.Everybodymusthavethesameinformationsothatnobodyhasanunfairadvantageoverothers.Marketsmustbeperfectlycompetitive.Thesearestrongrequirementsandareunlikelytoholdinmosteconomies.Thekeyquestioniswhethersuchdeviationsaresufficienttoinvalidatethebasicinsightoftheinvisiblehandofthemarket.IntheU.S.andU.K.itiswidelyagreedthatthisisnotthecaseanditisacceptedthatfirms’objectiveshouldbetocreatewealthforshareholders.2Inmanyothercountriesthereisnosuchconsensus.Japanisperhapsthemostextremeexample.Insteadoffocusingonthenarrowviewthatfirms’shouldconcentrateoncreatingwealthfortheirowners,corporategovernancehastraditionallybeenconcernedwithabroaderview.Onewayofarticulatingthisviewisthatcorporategovernanceisconcernedwithensuringthatfirmsareruninsuchawaythatsociety’sresourcesareusedefficientlybytakingintoaccountarangeofstakeholderssuchasemployees,suppliers,andcustomers,inadditiontoshareholders.Withimperfectmarketsthisbroadobjectivecanpotentiallymakeeverybodybetteroffcomparedtojustfocusingontheshareholders’interests(seeAllenandGale,2000).Forexample,ifthereareexternalitiessuchaspollutionthenmaximizingthevalueofthefirmiswellknowntocauseamisallocationofresources.Iffirmswereinsteadtousethebroaderviewabove,theywouldchangetheirbehaviorandproducethesociallyoptimallevelofpollution.Ingeneral,althoughitmaynotbepossibletoobtainefficiencyitmaybepossibletoachieveabetterallocationofresourceswiththebroadviewthanwiththenarrowone(seeAllenandGale,2000,andAllen,2005)..IncountriessuchasJapan,GermanyandFrance,itisthisbroadviewthatisoftenstressed.Ratherthanbeingconcernedonlywithshareholdersawidersetofstakeholdersincludingemployeesandcustomersaswellasshareholdersareconsidered.InfactinGermanythelegalsystemisquiteexplicitthatfirmsdonothaveasoledutytopursuetheinterestsofshareholders.Thisisthesystemofcodetermination.Inlargecorporationsemployeeshaveanequalnumberofseatsonthesupervisoryboardofthecompanywhichisultimatelyresponsibleforthestrategicdecisionsofthecompany.InJapan,managersdonothaveafiduciaryresponsibilitytoshareholders.Thelegalobligationofdirectorsis3suchthattheymaybeliableforgrossnegligenceinperformanceoftheirduties,includingthedutytosupervise(Scott,1998).Inpracticeitiswidelyacceptedthattheypursuetheinterestsofavarietyofstakeholders(see,forexample,AllenandGale,2000).ExamplesofCorporatePhilosophiesinJapanTable1containsatypicalstatementofcorporatephilosophyforaJapanesefirm.ItisforAsahiBreweries,awell-knownJapanesefirm.Verylittleattentionispaidtoshareholders.InfacttheyarenotevenmentioneduntilSection6andthenonlybriefly:“WeatAsahi,throughsecuringandexpandingthebaseofouroperations,desiretofulfillourresponsibilitiestostockholdersandthelocalcommunitiesinwhichweoperate.”Table1illustratestheperspectiveontheroleofthecorporationinsocietythatunderliesthebroaddefinitionofcorporategovernancegivenabove.TheJapanesecompanyToyotaprovidesanevenstrongerillustrationoftheideathatifcompaniespursuetheinterestsofallstakeholdersthenasuperiorallocationofresourcescanbeachieved.OnAugust1,2001theFinancialTimesreporteddetailsoftheannualmeetingoftheInternationalCorporateGovernanceNetworkwhichwasheldinTokyothatyear.“HiroshiOkuda,chairmanofToyotaMotorCorporationandoftheJapanFederationofEmployers'Associations,toldthe

1 / 19
下载文档,编辑使用

©2015-2020 m.777doc.com 三七文档.

备案号:鲁ICP备2024069028号-1 客服联系 QQ:2149211541

×
保存成功