20051Jan.,2005179JournalofShandongPoliceCollegeNo.1Ser.No.79(,100088):,,,,,,,,,,,:;;;;:D911.01:A:CN37-1432(2005)01-0083-04,,;,,,,,,,;;,[1],;;,,,:2004-12-06:(1974-),,,2004,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,38,,,?,,,[2],,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,[3],,,,,,,,,[4],,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,?,,:???1.,,,,,,[5],,;,;,,,,,,,2.,?,,,[6],48,;,[7],,,,,,,,,,,,3.,,,;,,,[8],,,,,,,,,,(),,,?,,,,,,,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[9],,Peczenik:1.2.3.4.5.(1-4)6.,,,[10],,,,,,,Peczenik,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,58[11],,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,[][1][2]EvelineT.Feteris,FundamentalsofLegalArgumentation[M].KluwerAcademicPub2lishers,1999.14.14.[3][4][].[M].,.:,1999.5.5.[5][6][7].[M].:,1997.49.76.76.[8].[J].,2004,(1).[9][10][11].[J].,(64).[]TheLegitimateCriterionofLegalArgumentationLIXiu-qun(LawSchool,ChinaUniversityofPoliticalScienceandLaw,Beijing,10088,China)Abstract:Asatheoreticalpursuitforthelegitimacyofconstitutionality,legalargumentationcarriesanim2portantmissionsearchingforthewaytoachievejudicialjusticeandsocialjustice.Bythemethodoflegalargu2mentation,wecanattainthejusticeofadjudicationinaspecificcaseandthusmanifesttheobjectiveofconstitu2tion.Owningtothediversetrainofthoughtsintheargumentation,therearedifferentviewsconcerningthele2gitimatecriterionoflegalargumentation,tonamesome:theeffectivenessofthelogic,acceptabilityandcoher2ence.Eachkindofcriterionisappliedinaspecificfield.Therefore,noneofthemalonecanberegardedasthelegitimatecriterionoflegalargumentation.However,thecombinationofthemcaninstead.Keywords:legalargumentation;legitimacy;effectivenessofthelogic;acceptability;coherence68