ShouldcloningofhumanbeingsbebannedItwouldbesaidthatthecloningtechniquewasoneofthehugeresultsinthelifescienceofhumanbeings¡¯society.Theexistenceofcloningtowardthemankindanddevelopmentseemstobebeneficial.Forexample,thecloningorganofthehumanbody,canrescuesomeone¡¯slife,whichmightgetclosetodie.However,inmyeyes,ifthiskindoftechniqueusedtocloneaperson,Ithinkitwillbeverydangerous.Accordingtotheinquisition,inBeijing,morethan70%visitedthinkthatthecloningofapersonwillmeetsometroubleorobstaclesallovertheworld.TheexpertsofFranceandChinathinkthatthecloninghumanfacesthefollowingproblems.Sowecannotneglectit.Thefirst,thecloningpersoncan'tbringintotheexistingrelationshipinethicssystemwiththepersoncloned.Second,thecloningpersonwillberesultinginhugeimpacttotherelationwiththeexistingsocietyandthefamilystructure.Thirdly,thetechniqueofcloningpersonmaybecometheterrorist'stool.Thefourth,agreatdealofcloningpersonswithhomologystructuremayinductnewdisease.Atlast,thecloningpersonproducesmentalblemishprobably,itwillbecomeanewsocialproblem.SoIthinkmanymorepeopleagreemyopinionthatcloningofhumanbeingsshouldbebanned.2Asweallknowthatthedevelopmentoflifesciencebringsanewtechnologytous----cloning.Tosomedegree,itseemsthatpeoplecanbenifitfromthistechnology.Forexample,ifanorganofsomeonehasbeenseriouslyinjured,thecloningcanrescuehisorherlife.Andthefactisthatthereare.tanyotherusefulandpracticalwaysnowadays.what'smore,withthehelpofthecloning,wecanproduceanexactcopyofaplantfromitscells,whichmeanstherewillnotbeanypeoplewhosuffersfromhungerinthefuture.However,inmyopinion,itisverydangeroustoapplythistechnologytohumanbeings.Firstofall,itcancauseproblemsbothinmoralandlaw.Andoursocietymaynotbeinharmonyanylonger.Secondly,sincethetechnologyisnotperfectandadvancednow,wecan'ttotallycontrolitandwecan'timaginewhatthecloninghumanwillbeifwefailtomakethem.Lastbutnotleast,supposeweallhaveclonesofourselves,howcanwefeelandthinkaboutourexistence?Ibelievethatinsomepartsofourlifewillbecompelelychangedandreplaced!Sofromwhatisaidabove,ithinkcloningofhumanbeingsshouldbebanned