Somepeoplethinkthatgivingaidtopoorercountrieshasmorenegativeeffectsthanthepositiveeffects.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisopinion.Inthisdayandage,thepublicusuallycharacterizedaidasbehaviorwhichissendingresources,suchasfoodandmoney,tocountriesindifficultsituations.However,somesaidthatnegativityofassistanceforpoorercountriesismorenotabilitythanpositivity.Isupportthisstatement.Thereasonsareasfollows.Manifestisthattheassistance,suchasprovidingriceandcotton,posesathreattotheagricultureindustry.Priortobeinginascantyconditionforalongtime,thenativeproductswasdominantsuppliesofliving,tocontrast,itisdevaluedforforeign-aidwhichcomesfromthedevelopedcountry.Additionally,theactionofsponsorsisattendedbyinterestandpurposeofthemselves.Inasmuchasgivingaid,forinstance,pouringahugeamountofcapitalintothemilitaryindustry,attributetoafactthateconomicprogressofpoorercountriesexistimbalance.Meantime,theyaredeprivedoftheopportunitythatisindependentimprovingcoretechnologyandconstructingcompleteindustrychainbythedonors.Lastbutnottheleast,theunequally-distributedsupplieshasrenderedconflictgrabbingresources.Consideringthatthedeficientlawsystem,thesuppliesofaidisutilizedprivatelybythegovernmentorasmallpartofcitizens.Consequently,theremightbeagapbetweenwealthandpoor.Moreover,itwouldfomentsocialunrest.Ashasbeennotedabove,theassistanceforpoorcountriesbringsshort-termrelief,thedemeritsdeliversprevailoverthemerititgenerates.Iftheaidwereprovidedwiththepositiveeffectsbytakingcomprehensiveandreasonableaction,theassistanceistobeinthebestinterestsofdwellersinthethirdworlds.