love-is-a-fallacy主题分析

“Loveisafallacy”isapunthatcanbeunderstoodoftwomeanings.Loveisnotonlyanerror,adeception,butalsoanemotionthatdoesnotfollowtheprincipleoflogic.Loveisfallacious,deceptive,ormisleading.Lovemakesthenarratorstupid.When“fallacy”referstothequalityofbeingdeceptive,thetitlemeans“thereisadeceptiveordelusivequalityaboutlove”.Loveisanillusion.DobieexchangedhisraccooncoatforPetey’sgirlfriend.Whenpeopleregardloveasadeal,itcouldbeafallacy.Peteythoughtaraccooncoatwasmoreimportantthanhisgirlfriend,sothelovebetweenPeteyandPollywasafallacy,too.PollylovesPeteyisafallacy.PollychoosesPetey,becausePeteyisabletowanderaroundthecampuslikethosebigmeninhisnewfashionableraccooncoat.shecan’tbeintelligentenoughtounderstandwhatistemporaryandwhatisenduring,whatisillusoryandwhatispractical.Loveisillogical.Thenarratorhasalogicalmind,buthefailstowinthegirl’slove,whichdoesnotfollowtherulesoflogic.Whentakenasaspecificterminlogic,thetitlemeans“lovecannotbededucedfromasetofgivenpremises”.Loveisunpredictable,unreasonable.Lovecannotbepredicted.Wecan’tdecideourcouple.Dobie’slovetoPollyisafallacy.DobiebelieveshecanchangePollyintoasmartwoman,andthentheytwobecomeapairofenviableperfectcouple.Thisistrulya“false-analogy”fallacy.DobietaughtPollyseverallogictheoryduringwholedatingtimeinordertomakeanintellectualwife.Loveisafallacywhenthetwopeoplehaveotherpurposeorjustlovepartoftheperson.Pollyprovesthenarrator’slovetoherafallacy.WhenheshowshislovetoPollyafterthat,Pollyrefutesallhisargumentsasillogicalbasedonexactlythesamefallaciesheteachesher.ThatmeanshislovetoPollyisjustafallacy.ThefailuremadeDobierealizethatloveisnotfollowthetraditionalroutine.Loveisafallacythathaveanunexpectedending.NeitherthenarratornorPollyloveseachother,andtheydon’tknowwhatisloveatall.ThenarratorgetsonPollytomakeherhiswife,andPollygetsonPeteyforraccoon.Botharenotforlove,butforotherpurposes.That’swhywefindthatloveisafallacyinthetext.