搜索
273()Vo.l27No.320116JournalofNorthChinaInstituteofWaterConservancyandHydroelectricPower(SocialScience)Jun.2011:2011-03-09:(1982),,,洪超1,李伟2(1.,830046;2.,450008):民事再审程序是对民事纠纷提供救济的特殊程序它在于提供补偿性救济途径,弥补常规程序的不足或错误然而,由于对再审程序的过分依赖,导致了再审程序的滥用,严重影响了司法的终局性和司法权威再审程序的进一步完善,必须放弃全面纠错思想,以程序功能有限性为基础,将正义的实现和秩序的维护有机统一起来,平衡不同价值之间的冲突,为诉讼当事人提供程序性救济:再审程序;民事再审程序;理论基础;价值定位:D92:A:10084444(2011)03011203,,,,,,,[1]2007,2008,,,(一)再审程序的功能定位因审级制度不健全而最终偏离制度设计的初衷,,,,;;;[2](P389-391),,,,,[2](P411),,,,,,[3](P32),,,,(二)再审指导思想与司法程序能力有限性之间的冲突,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,(三)再审对裁判既判力形成的冲击,,,,,,,,[4](P36-37),,,(四)再审对维护司法权威所产生的负面影响,,,,[5](P7),,,[5](P29),,,,,(五)再审造成的终审不终与司法效率的冲突:;,,,,;,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,(一)坚持依法合理有限纠错的指导思想,容忍错误存在的可能性,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(二)以程序本位理念为基础,侧重于再审程序的程序性救济功能,,,,,,,,,,,,113273,:[6](P354),,[6](P362-369)(三)以程序安定价值为基础,赋予再审裁判终局性效力,,[6](P362-369),,[5](P1),,[5](P2),,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(四)平衡考虑司法效益与司法公正的关系,,,,,,,,,,,,[7](P51),,,,,,,,,:[1].[M].,2002,(6).[2].[M].:,2005.[3].[M].:,2007.[4].[D].:,2005.[5].[M].:,1999.[6].[M].:,2008.[7].[D].:,2000.AninvestigationoftheoreticalfoundationofOurCivilSuitRetrialProgramHONGChao1,LIWei2(1.LawSchool,XinjiangUniversity,Urumqi830046,China;2.Zhengzhoubranchoffice,DaCanghaiLawoffice,Zhengzhou450008,China)Abstract:Civilsuitretrialprogramisaspecialreliefprogramincivildisputes.Itistoprovideremedialreliefwaytoretrievethedeficiencyorerrorofroutineprocedure.However,asaresultofexcessivedependenceontheretrialprocedure,leadingtotheabuseofretrialprocedure,soastoseriouslyaffectthefinalityofjudicialpowerandjudicialauthority.Theretrialprocedureneedtobefurtherimprovedinthefurture.Wemustgiveuptheideasofallroundcorrection,considertheunityofrealizationofjusticeandmaintenanceofsocialorder,andbalancetheconflictbetweendifferentvalues.Basedonthefinitudeofproceduralfunction,theaimofourcivilretrialprocedureshouldbeprovideproceduralreliefforthelitigants.Keywords:Theretrialprocedure;Civilsuitretrialprogram;Theoreticalfoundation;Valueorientation(:)114()20116