友好仲裁制度研究

华侨大学硕士学位论文友好仲裁制度研究姓名：黄哲仁申请学位级别：硕士专业：法学·国际法学指导教师：邓杰2010050134:5AbstractAmiablecompositionisafocalissueintheinternationalcommercialarbitrationandalwayscauseswidediscussionbetweenscholars.Establishmentofamiablecompositionisofgreatsignificanceintheremedyofunfairandunreasonablejudgmentproducedinstrictlyaccordancewithlawrules,achievementofbenefitsofcommercialarbitration,andreflectionofpartyautonomy.Thisthesispaysgreatattentiontotheconceptionofamiablecomposition,theoreticbasisofamiablecomposition,anddisadvantagesandremediesinpracticeofamiablecomposition,combinesourarbitrationpracticesandexpectstohelpestablishingamiablecompositioninourcountry.Besideintroductionandconclusion,thethesisconsistsoffourchapters:Chapteronefirstdefinesconceptionandfeaturesofamiablecomposition,clearsdistinctionbetweenitandrelatedconcept.Andthenbycombingandcomparinglegislationandpracticeofamiablecompositionintheinternationalcommunity,analyzessignificanceofestablishingamiablecompositionintheinternationalcommunity.Chaptertwoexaminesoriginanddevelopmentofamiablecomposition,basesonwhichthethesisreasonsvaluebasisofamiablecomposition,andanalyzesfunctionofamiablecomposition.Towardsabovediscusstohaveunderstandingthatvaluefunctionofamiablecompositionisachievementoffurthestjusticeandfairnessofawards,achievementofbenefitsofcommercialarbitration,andreflectionofpartyautonomy.Chapterthreeinvestigatespracticeofamiablecomposition,discussesbeginningofamiablecomposition,groundsforjudgmentin6practiceofamiablecomposition,andindicatesdisadvantagesandremediesinpracticeofamiablecomposition,tocertifypracticalfeasibilityofamiablecomposition.ChapterfouranalyzescurrentarbitrationlawinChina,andindicatesthatamiablecompositionhasnotestablishedinourcountry,reasonsnecessityandfeasibilityofestablishamiablecompositioninourcountry,toprovideenforceablelegislativesuggestionsaboutimprovementofamiablecompositioninourcountry.Keywords:Amiablecomposition,exaequoetbono,theoreticalbasis,practicalapplication11AlternativeDisputeResolutionADR)1889WTO212343amiablecomposition1.12.23.(amiablecomposition)(amiablecompositeur)(exaequoetbono)34.41.[M].2004410.2.ADR()[J].200514.3.[M].2003291.4.[M].2003347.455.[M].19863.56arbitration-mediation789106.[M].1999195.7.[M].2008180.81980101097210.[M].198115.671111.[M].2002449.8126211351416971915161712SeeHong-LinYu.AmiableComposition-ALearningCurve17JournalofInternationalArbitration81(2000).13.[M].2001491.14.[M].20033-7.15.[M].2006107.16.[M].20051-2.17.[M].2003119.918192019791996211322180618.[M].20029.19SeeMauroRubino-Sammartano.Internationalarbitrationlawandpractice()[M].2003468.20SeeFouchardGaillardGoldman.onInternationalCommercialArbitration()[M].2004835.21SeeDavid.ArbitrationinInternationalTrade1985p.330.22SeeDavid.ArbitrationinInternationalTrade1985p.330.10195619812319811474149719811474198114972425262719962819961996195023SeeHong-LinYu.AmiableComposition-ALearningCurve17JournalofInternationalArbitration81(2000).24SeeMauroRubino-Sammartano.AmiableCompositeur(JointMandatetoSettle)andExBonoEtAequo(AuthoritytoMitigateStrictLaw)ApparentSynonymsRevisited,(1992)9(1)J.I.A.5.25SeeDavid.ArbitrationinInternationalTrade1985p.335-336.26SeeBorn.InternationalCommercialArbitrationintheUnitedStates(1994)p.135.27SeeKerr.EquityArbitrationinEngland2(4)'TheAmericanReviewofInternationalArbitration377(1993).28SeeKarenS.Weinberg.EquityinInternationalArbitration:HowFairisFairAStudyofLexMercatoriaandAmiableComposition,BostonUniversityInternationalLawJournalVo1.121994.111975197919964646b29303132703319981010513199482229SeeRutherfordandSims.ArbitrationAct1996APracticeGuide1996para.46.4.30SeeCraigParkandPaulsson.InternationalChamberofCommerceArbitration1991p.137.31SeeCraigParkandPaulsson.InternationalChamberofCommerceArbitration1991p.137.32SeeDavid.ArbitrationinInternationalTrade1985p.330.33SeeHong-LinYu.AmiableComposition-ALearningCurve17JournalofInternationalArbitration81(2000).12834198718721965(ConventionontheSettlementofInvestmentDisputesbetweenStatesandNationalsofOtherStates)34423123542242336(TheUnitedNationsCommissiononInternationalTradeLaw)1985UNCITRALModelLawonInternationalCommercialArbitration34,(ICSID)3542421()236.[M].2001156.1320067739198520062841976332199817337383937.[M].2001231.38.[J].2004268.39.[M].2004103.144040.ADR[J].200514.15,,,,,,41,,,424341[].[M].198879.42.[J].1993115.43.[J].()1999612.16,,,,,,,44,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,44[].[M].199120.17,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4545.[M].200583.184647484946[].[M].2004422.47[].[M].2004419.48[].[M].1994142.49[].[M].1990135.19505150[].[M].2004423.51.[M].200825.20525352.[M].1999233.53.[M].199960.21541961711985281555654[].[M].1993611.55.[M].1999125.56[].[M].1993613.225757[].[M].1993611.235819981020062841.592.199823:3.19851700:168316831:181:58591969431324:606160SeeMauroRubino-Sammartano.Internationalarbitrationlawandpractice()[M].2003468.61SeeMauroRubino-Sammartano.Internationalarbitrationlawandpractice()[M].2003469.25(exaequoetbono)(exaequoetbono)626362SeeHong-LinYu.AmiableComposition-ALearningCurve17JournalofInternationalArbitration81(2000).63SeeF