试论网络著作权侵权制度的缺陷与完善

上海交通大学硕士学位论文试论网络著作权侵权制度的缺陷与完善姓名：赖爱玉申请学位级别：硕士专业：法律指导教师：寿步200711252001WTO198420GroksterGroksterTHERESEARCHONFLAWSANDIMPROVEMENTSOFCHINA’SLAWABOUTONLINECOPYRIGHTINFRIDGEMENTABSTRACTIn2001,China,asadevelopingcountry,enteredintotheWTOinordertokeeppaceinfiercecompetitionintheprocessofglobalization.Becauseofthisobjective,Chinamadesomeconcessions.Inthefieldofprotectingintellectualpropertyrights,ChinamademanyamendmentsinalargescaleafterenteringintoWTO.Asthenumberoflawaboutintellectualpropertyrightsisincreasingandthescopeofitsprotectionisenlarging,therearemoreandmorecasesofintellectualpropertyrights.CasessuedbymultinationalcorporationshasbeinggreatlyinfluencedthedevelopmentofChineseindustriesineveryfield.What’smore,thedevelopedcountriesstillputpressureonChinatoimprovethesituationofprotectingintellectualpropertyrights.Therefore,itisessentialforChinatohave“goodlawandjudicialpractices”toprovidefriendlyenvironmentforthedevelopmentofallindustries.ThisarticleaimstofindoutthegapbetweenAmericanandChina’sjudiciallevelinprotectingtechnologicalindustries’development,andfigureouttheshortcomingsofourlawsystemandgivesomeadvicebyanalyzingcasesoccurringinAmericaandChina.Continuoustechnologicalinnovationsdemandamendmentsoflawtobalancedevelopmentoftechnologicalindustriesandrightsofcopyrightholders.Inrecentyears,China’snetworkindustrieshavebeingdevelopedrapidlyononehand,however,thenumberofcasessuinginternetserviceprovidersareincreasingontheotherhand.Becauseoflackofrelevantlawandcases,China’scourttendstoconcludethatrespondentsconstitutedirectinfringementorjointtort,whichhaschillingeffectsonthedevelopmentofinternetindustriesandalsomakesthemconcernedbyrelevantcompanies,juristsandlegalexpertsandsoon.ThecontradictionbetweentechnologiesandlawoccurringinAmericatoo,Americaisdoingbetterintheaspectofprotectingtechnologicaldevelopment.Therefore,itisnecessaryforustolearnfromtheAmerican.Secondliabilityisplayingimportantroleinonlinecopyrightinfringementpractice.ItisreflectedsomewhereinAmericanlaw,however,isdevelopedbycaselaw.In1984,theruleestablishedin“Sonycase”isespeciallybeneficialfortechnologicalindustriesdevelopment.20yearslater,theruleestablishedin“Grokstercase”isslightlydifferentfromtheSony’sinrestrictionsonthesituationsitisused,providingfriendlyenvironmentfortechnologicaldevelopment.Ininternettechnologicaldevelopment,ChinashouldlearnfromadvancedAmericanlaw,keepinginmindthatitisourresponsibilitytoprotecttechnologicaldevelopmentandtechnologicalindustries.Thisarticleconsistsofthreeparts:chapteroneisaboutresearchoncasesofAmericanonlinecopyrightinfringement,includingintroductionoftheAmericanlaw,andstudieson“Sonycase”and“Grokstercase”.ChaptertwoisaboutresearchoncasesofChina’sonlinecopyrightinfringement,includingintroductionoftheChineselaw,andstudiesontwocases.ChapterthreeisaboutflawsandimprovementsofChina’slawaboutonlinecopyrightinfringement,includingsummaryofflawsofcurrentlawsystemandadvicetoimproveit.KEYWORDS:contributoryinfringement,secondaryliability,RightofCommunicationthroughtheInformationNetwork,jointtorttechnologicalindustry120012003200671211.1178981790secondaryconsideration11976197619801984199319981998DigitalMillenniumCopyrightAct,DMCA1SonyCorp.ofAmerica.v.UniversalCityStudios,Inc.,464U.S.417,429(1984).13DMCADMCADMCA4052DMCA3DMCADMCAOnlineServiceProvider,OSP4OSPOSP1992(TheAudioHomeRecordingActof1992)19982200533414,1984Sony2005Grokster1.251.2.12070Betamax1976Betamax1.2.2Betamax5SonyCorp.ofAmericav.UniversalCityStudio,Inc..156BetamaxBetamaxBetamaxconstructiveknowledgeBetamaxproductiveuseBetamaxBetamax1.2.3,6167891.3Grokster101.3.1GroksterGroksterP2PP2PP2P10P2P70%112003Grokster720044820068184918310GroksterMetro-Goldwyn-MayerStudiosv.Grosker,Ltd..118187171.3.2GroksterGrokster1984GroksterStreamCastP2PP2PP2PP2PP2PP2P1.3.3Grokster18MichaelGraham12Nornell1320Grokster12GroskerP2P20058132921.3714MP3TRIPS2.12.1.1201910219901992712001TRIPSTRIPS14://music.yule.sohu.com/20071011/n252598262.shtml,2007101116chinamp32122.2.2chinamp3chinamp3chinamp3chinamp327chinamp3chinamp3chinamp3chinamp3chinamp3chinamp3171720041303213182.2.3chinamp3://