经营者对企业破产的个人责任

上海交通大学硕士学位论文经营者对企业破产的个人责任姓名：辛会玲申请学位级别：硕士专业：民商法指导教师：韩长印20060101123OPERATORS’INDIVIDUALLIABILITYTOBANKRUPTCYOFENTERPRISESABSTRACTOperators’liabilitytobankruptcyofenterprisesistheextensionontheBankruptcyLawoftheEnterpriseLawortheCompanyLawaboutoperators’obligation,strengthenthedirectresultofprotectingthecreditor'sinterestsontheCompanyLawatthesametime.Butbecausethisliabilitycanonlyhappenwhenenterprisesarebankrupt,theformandfactorsofliabilitymustbeconfirmedbyconsideringtheruleandidealwhichtheEnterpriseLawandtheBankruptcyLawprotectcreditors’interestwith.Thetheoryoftraditionalcompanylawdoesnoteventhinkitnecessarytostipulateoperators’liabilityintheBankruptcyLaw,anditstheoreticalfoundationliesintheoperator'sbehaviorarrangedbymarketpower,andthereforeitdoesn’tneedinvolvementofthelaw,especiallyinvolvementoftheBankruptcyLaw.ThesituationofChinaismorespecial.Operatorsofstate-ownedenterpriseswhicharesupportedbehindbygovernmenthavebetterimmunitytomarket.4Thisimmunitytomarketisnotthedecisivefactorofsettingupoperators’individualliability.Thekeyquestionislackoffulfillingone'sdutyinaconscientiousanddown-to-earthmannerasthe“immunity”operatorindividualofstate-ownedenterpriseofattendantphenomenonofmechanism;evenlackitasanoperator'sminimumresponsibilityconsciousnesstoenterprise'sdestiny.Thereforetheoperator'sresponsibilityreformanddevelopmenttoenterprisesseemtobeakey.Ifwecanregarditastheendlineforpreventingenterprisesgoingbankrupt,andsetupakindofliabilityinvestigationmechanismonthisline,thenestablishingoperators’liabilitytobankruptcyofenterprisesbecomesthemaingoalforbankruptcylegislationnaturally.Thistextamountstofourchapters.Chapteroneisabouttheanalysisoftheconcept,nature,meaningofoperators’individualliabilitytobankruptcyenterprise.Atfirst,definetherangeofoperators;Second,researchintothenatureofinfringementthattheoperatorundertakesindividualliability,andanalyzethisnaturemainlythroughthecontrastofthetwofundamentaldepartmentsoflaw;finally,explainbrieflythemeaningofthesystemofindividualliabilitytoenterprisesgoingbankrupt.Chaptertwoprobesintothefoundationaltheoryofoperators'liabilitytobankruptcyofenterprises.ChapterthreewiththeintroductionofBritainandothercountries’legislationonindividualliability,pointoutthedefectandthe5drawbackthatdefectbringsinofourcountry’currentlaw.Chapterfour,withthechoiceofthelegislativemode,establishingthesystemofthecivilpropertyliability,thefactorsofliability,theformofliabilityandtheimplementofoperators’individualliabilityinpractice,makethesystemofoperators’individualliabilitytobankruptcyofenterprisesperfectinourcountry.Keywordsoperator,individualliability,losethequalification,resumetheright12006110234121:2005515220027751998-20032413343:401:(20011115)23:565200304406[]200016077:30(200023)897200254082001145919871728?10935:311;1019950335111999569121312199681118-120139199890101415142000420111519981551213161716ShirleyS.Cho,ContinuingEconomicReforminthePeople'sRepublicofChina:BankruptcyLegislationLeadstheWayHastingsInt'1&Comp.L.Rev.v.19(1996),P.749.172003012814(commonpool)1819 198621418200023219CreditLyonnaisBankN.Y.v.PathcCommunications1991Del.Ch.Lexis215(Del.Cb.1991).151976MasonMason2016BusinessJudgment21BusinessJudgment19483321985458198619861948171948332194819854581982Corkwrongfultrading181984——“”198621321411992(thecorporatelawreformact1992)1922  2193588119401953196632322L.S.Sealy,PersonalLiabilityofDirectorsandOfficersforDebtsofInsolvencyCorporations:AJurisdictionalPerspective(England),CurrentDevelopmentsinInternationalandComparativeCorporateInsolvencyLaw,Oxford(1994),P502-P503.231999119213293199911641322019862131[]2[]24194833219483321986213defraudcreditorsforfraudulentpurpose24200312115921213213213198621425Wrongfultrading252141[]322[]212223219864283[]224[21423]2341425[2144]4222612“”34[statutorydefence]2728AB36[]7[]8[213]2133200312115916026C.WilliamsandA.McGee,ACompanyDirector'sLiabilityforWrongfulTradingCharteredAssociationofCertifiedAccOuntants,CertifiedAccountantsEducationalTrust,ResearchReportNo.39,London,1992,ExecutiveSummary.27L.S.Sealy,PersonalLiabilityofDirectorsandOfficersforDebtsofInsolvencyCorporations:AJurisdictionalPerspective(England),CurrentDevelopmentsinInternationalandComparativCorporateInsolvencyLaw,Oxford(1994),P.491.281993612082329commis-sion214214Sealy129LordDenning242123425[disqualification]30 1“”2341AB23430199361207265/199263132impropertrading,198631L.S.Sealy,PersonalLiabilityofDirectorsandOfficersforDebtsofInsolvencyCorporations:AJurisdictionalPerspective(England)”,CurrentDevelopmentsinInternationalandComparativeCorporateInsolvencyLaw,Oxford(1994),P.508-P509P.510-P511.322003013127198633contributionstothecompany’sassets34198635361234372153319936121034L.S.Sealy,PersonalLiabilityofDirectorsandOfficersforDebtsofInsolvencyCorporations:AJurisdictionalPerspective(England),CurrentDevelopmentsinInternationalandComparativeCorporateInsolvencyLaw,Oxford(1994),P.494352115198536[]R2001411013719936121028AB200,0006588Gab2