MBBR法处理养猪场污水实验研究邓书平

MBBR(MBBR)(HRT)CODcrNH3N50%()10hCODcr4111223mg/LNH3N193387mg/LCODcr100mg/L90%NH3N80mg/L80%(GB18596-2001)[e-mail]1121.1130012.130011StudyontheTreatmentofPiggeryWastewaterbyMovingBedBiofilmReactorDENGShuping1MUShujie1BAOQinghua21.VocationalandTechnicalCollegeLiaoningUniversityofPetroleumChemicalTechnologyFushun1130012.TheenvironmentsupervisedepartmentofChangchunJingyueeconomicdevelopmentzone,Changchun130011AbstractMovingbedbiofilmreactor(MBBR)wasusedtotreatdigestedpiggerywastewatertheinfluencesoffillingpro-portionofcarrierhydraulicretentiontime(HRT)CODcrandNH3NconcentrationofinfluentonthetreatmenteffectwereinvestigatedTheresultsshowthatundertheconditionsoffillingproportionofcarrieris50%(volumeratio)HRTinsinglereactoris10htheinletCODcrconcentrationranges4911312mg/LandtheinletNH3Nconcentrationranges193387mg/LMBBRoperatessteadilywithgoodeffecttheefluentCODcris100mg/Linaveragewithremovalratemorethan90andtheefluentNH3Nis80mg/Linaveragewithremovalrate80respectivelymeetingthestandardsofDischargeStandardofPollutantsforLivestockandPoultryBreeding(GB18596-2001)KeywordsMBBRhydraulicretentiontimefillingproportionofcarrier(MBBR)1MBBR132120093JournalofChangchunUniversityofScienceandTechnologyNaturalScienceEditionVol.32No.1Mar.2009MBBRl1.1MBBR()()CNP1.21MBBR30cm×30cm×40cm36L1MBBRFig.1ExperimentaldeviceofMBBR1.32MBBRMBBR(0.920.97g/cm3)200500m2/m31.411Tab.1RawwastewaterqualitypHCODer/mg/LBOD5/mg/L/mg/L7.3~8.0411~1223214~776193~3871.5pHCODcr31.64776mg/LMBBR7d12cmCODcrNH3N22.1MBBRCODcr962mg/L12hCODcr422CODcrFig.2InfluenceoffillingproportionofcarrieronCODcrremovalefficiency2CODcr50CODcr905050CODcr5020091582.2HRTCODcrNH3NCODcrNH3N962mg/L298mg/L(HRT)HRTCODcrNH3N33HRTCODcrNH3NHRT10hCODcrNH3N2HRT10h2.3MBBRCODcrHRT10hMBBRCODcr544CODcr600mg/L1000mg/LCODcr901200mg/LCODcrCODcrCODcrCODcrCODcrCODcr2.4MBBRNH3NNH3NHRT10hNH3NMBBRNH3N525NH3NNH3N8080mg/L2.5MBBR2mg/L(810):13MBBR50%()HRTCODcrNH3NHRT10hCODcrNH3N9080%HRTCODcrNH3NCODcrMBBRCODcrNH3N100mg/L80mg/L1563HRTCODcrNH3NFig.3InfluenceofHRTonCODandNH3Nremovalefficiency4CODcrCODcrFig.4InfluenceofinfluentCODcrcon-centrationsonCODcrremovalefficiency5NH3NNH3NFig.5InfluenceofinfluentNH3Nconcen-trationonNH3NremovalefficiencyMBBR115940mL3min50mL13TritonX-100Cu()PANmax=550nm(550nm)=1.48×104Lmol1cm1Cu()01mg/L96.2%102.6%102.64%2.12%1/201.J.2006267307308.2.J.20022158689.3.J.2005222333335.4.J.-2006427582585.5.J.-20044011684685.1Tab.1Analyticalresultsofsamples(n=10g/mL)(g/mL)(%)(g)(g)(%)0.70,0.67,0.68,0.68,0.67,0.70,0.720.692.645.004.8196.20.87,0.85,0.860.84,0.89,0.87,0.88,0.84,0.88,0.830.862.125.005.13102.6159(GB185962001)CODcr400mg/LNH3N80mg/LMBBR6510MBBR1J20032941315.2.J.20031925657.3M20024J200410892022.5J200343146506J20042421215.7.MBRJ.200730198101.2009156