PostProjectReviewQuestionnaire1TobecompletedbyProjectLeaderonlyProject:Client:ReviewDate:ReviewTypeFinalEvaluationVenue:EvaluatorProjectStartDate:AttendeesfromClientProjectInformationNameLeaderPartnersStartDateFinishDateTypeofCollaboration(tickallthatapply)SupplyChainProductProcessServiceResearchOther(identify)ProjectDescriptionQuantitativeResults:ItemMeasureGrossChange%ChangeCommentImpactonSalesImpactonProductivityImpactonQualityImpactonTechnologyImpactonSkillsReturnonInvestmentQualitativeAssessment:Estimatethelevelofsuccessoftheproject5verysatisfied4satisfied3neutral2dissatisfied1verydissatisfied#ElementScore1Sponsorsatisfactionwiththeprojectresult2Sponsorsatisfactionwiththewaytheprojectwasperformed(theprocess)3Levelofsatisfactionwithyouroveralllevelofcontributiontotheproject?4Levelofsatisfactionwiththecontributionfromotherpartners?5Projectmetcost/benefitgoalsorotherplannedoutcomesHowoftenweremeetingsheld?TypeFrequencyCommentStrategicProgressBi-lateralWhatrolewasplayedbyyouasapartnerinthisproject(checkallthatapplies)?:FacilitatorProcessChampionActivePartnerPassivePartnerTeamleaderProjectmanagerProjectmanagerOther(pleaseidentify):BusinessPerformanceMybenefitshavebeenBetterthanexpectedMuchasexpectedLowerthanexpectedNonexistentIbelievebenefitstopartnershavebeenBetterthanexpectedMuchasexpectedLowerthanexpectedNonexistentCommentLeadershipLeadershipofthiscollaborationhasbeenExcellentVeryGoodAdequatePoorMeetingshavebeenVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorIssuesraisedhavebeenresolvedVeryeffectivelyEffectivelyAdequatelyPoorlyCommunicationaboutobjectivesanddeliveryhasbeenVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorCommentIntegrationSystemsusedtomonitorandcontrolprogressareVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorSystemsforcommunicationareVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorPerformancemetricsusedtomeasureprogressarevisibleandusedVeryeffectivelyEffectivelyAdequatelyPoorlyResourcestomanageandruntheprojecthavebeenplanned&deliveredVeryeffectivelyEffectivelyAdequatelyPoorlyTheintegrationofcompetenciesbetweenpartnerswasVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorCommentCompatibilityThecollaborationpartnersworkedtogetherasateamVeryeffectivelyEffectivelyAdequatelyPoorlyTheworkrateofteammembersfocusedondeliveringobjectiveswasVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorAccesstoprogressinformationby/fromteammemberswasVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorCooperationbetweenmembersbothatmeetingsandotherwisewasVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorObjectivesweredeliveredtoplanbecausetheteamspiritandcoherencewasVeryeffectiveEffectiveAdequatePoorCommentIdentify3keythingsthatweredonewelland3thingsthatdidnotworkwellThingsthatWorkedWellThingsthatWorkedBadlyWhat,ifany,unusualenvironmental/externalinfluences(whichmighthaveeitheradverselyorfavourablyaffectedtheproject)occurred?FavourableInfluencesAdverseInfluencesConsiderhowRISKwasmanagedforthisprojectWhatkeyrisksidentifiedatthestartorduringtheprojectwereyousuccessfulinmanaging?Whatriskswereyouunsuccessfulinmanaging,andwhy?Whatunidentifiedriskssurfacedasproblemsorcrises?Howcouldthesehavebeenmitigatedoravoided?Ratethefollowingcharacteristicsforthecollaborationproject.Usearatingfrom1to5,where1islowand5ishigh.Iftheitemdoesnotapply,markanX.#CharacteristicAtStartCurrent1Ownknowledgeofcollaboration2Otherpartners’knowledgeofcollaboration3Compatibilityofskillsamongpartnership4Cross-partnerTeamIntegration5Meetingquality6Criticaldataandinformationidentificationamongpartners7Criticaldataandinformationsharingamongpartners8Owncommitmenttocarryoutassignedactionsandtasks9Otherpartners’commitmenttocarryoutassignedactionsandtasks10SpeedyProblemresolution11OwnlevelofTrustinotherpartners12OtherPartners’levelofTrustinyou13Socialnetworkingbetweenpartners14Knowledgeofeachother’sbusinesses15Customerperceptionofyourorganisation16Customerperceptionoftheoverallpartnership17IntegrationofQualityacrosspartnership18IntegrationofCustomerFocusacrosspartnership19ComplexityinmanagingcollaborationPostProjectReviewQuestionnaire2TobecompletedbyEachPartnerProject:Client:ReviewDate:ReviewTypeFinalEvaluationVenue:EvaluatorProjectStartDate:AttendeesfromClientProjectInformationNameLeaderPartnersStartDateFinishDateTypeofCollaboration(tickallthatapply)SupplyChainProductProcessServiceResearchOther(identify)ProjectDescriptionQuantitativeResults:ItemMeasureGrossChange%ChangeCommentImpactonSalesImpactonProductivityImpactonQualityImpactonTechnologyImpactonSkillsReturnonInvestmentQualitativeAssessment:Estimatethelevelofsuccessoftheproject5verysatisfied4satisfied3neutral2dissatisfied1verydissatisfied#ElementScore1Sponsorsatisfactionwiththeprojectresult2Sponsorsatisfactionwiththewaytheprojectwasperformed(theprocess)3Levelofsatisfactionwithyouroveralllevelofcontributiontotheproject?4Levelofsatisfactionwiththecontributionfromotherpartners?5Projectmetcost/benefitgoalsorotherplannedoutcomesWhatrolewasplayedbyyouasapartnerinthisproject(checkallthatapplies)?:FacilitatorProcessChampionActivePartnerPassivePartnerTeamleaderProjectmanagerProjectmanagerOther(pleaseidentify):BusinessPerformanceMybe