水资源利用效率及评价方法若干问题研究

28320105Vol.28No.3JournalofEconomicsofWaterResourcesMay2010:([2007]4):(1984!),,,,:(1963!),,,,Email:[e-mail]:10.3969/j.issn.10039511.2010.03.001水资源利用效率及评价方法若干问题研究白颖,王红瑞,许新宜,谢琼(,,100875):探讨了水资源利用效率及其评价的定义和内涵,介绍了国内外水资源利用效率相关问题的研究进展,对各种水资源利用效率评价方法进行了汇总和对比,分析了水资源利用效率评价中存在的主要问题:对水资源利用效率评价的基础理论研究不够;在评价区域水资源利用效率时,没有将土壤计算在内;水资源利用效率评价中缺少生态环境指标没有计算虚拟水没有考虑水质的影响等:水资源;利用效率;评价方法;指标体系:TV2139:A:10039511(2010)03000104,,,,[1],,,,[2],,,,,,11894,,,Rec=(E0-N0)/R1(1):Rec;R1;E0;N0Rec,11[3],,,,[4],,,,,[5],,[6],,1,,∀1∀水利经济,2010,28(3)Email:[e-mail]:#kkb.hhu.edu.cn电话/传真:[phone],,,,,,,11,,[3],,,,:,,,,,,,2182090,,,,,Howell[7],,,,,,,CO2[8];Condon[9]CO2,,Thompson[10],1980~1985,32%,Colenbrander[11],205070,1957~19823,Aida[12]DEA108Anwandter[13]Sanders[14],[1516],,[17],,,[18][19]GDP[20],,∀2∀水利经济,2010,28(3)Email:[e-mail]:#kkb.hhu.edu.cn电话/传真:[phone][21],,52,,,22,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,(1~3),,(),,,,,,,,,,,(DMU),,,[22],,;[23]17(),,,,,,[24][25]23a.,,,,,,,,∀3∀水利经济,2010,28(3)Email:[e-mail]:#kkb.hhu.edu.cn电话/传真:[phone]b.,,,,,,,c.,,,,,d.,,,,GDP,GDP,,e.,,,,[2627],,,f.,,200862m3,1/6,,,:[1].4[J]..2005,23(2):16.[2].[J].,2009(5):3438.[3].:[J].,2005(9):2527.[4],.[J].:,2004(4):3639.[5].21[J].,2001(1):6671.[6].[J].,2001(12):1316.[7]HOWELLTA.Enhancingwateruseefficiencyinirrigatedagriculture[J].AgronomyJournal,2001,93:281289.[8]SINCLAIRTR,TANNERCB,BENNETTJM.Wateruseefficiencyincropproduction[J].BioScience,1984,34(1):3640.[9]CONDONAG,RICHARDSRA,REBETZKEGJ,etal.Improvingintrinsicwateruseefficiencyandcropyield[J].CropScience,2002,42:122131.[10]STEPHENTA.WaterusemanagementandpianningintheUnitedStates[M].SanDiego:AcademyPress,1999.[11]COLENBRANDERHJ.WaterintheNetherland[M].Hague:TheNetherlandsOrganizationforAppliedScientificResearch,1986.[12]AIDAK,COOPERWW,PASTORJT,etal.EvaluatingwatersupplyservicesinJapanwithRAM:arangeadjustedmeasureofinefficiency[J].OMEGA,1998,26:207232.[13]ANWANDTERL.Canpublicsectorreformsimprovetheefficiencyofpublicwaterutilities?anempiricalanalysisofthewatersectorinMexicousingdataenvelopmentanalysis[D].Maryland:UniversityofMaryland,2000.[14]SANDERSSD.Dataenvelopmentanalysisforbenchmarkingpublicsectorutilitiesoperations[D].Dallas:SouthernMethodistUniversity,1999.[15],,,.[J].,2004,19(2):160169.[16],.GDP[J].:,2001,37(4):24322437.[17],,,.[J].,2009,20(5):732738.[18],,,.[J].,1999,4(2):1922.[19],,.[J].∀,2008,18(3):215220.[20].[J].,2001,20(3):240246.(下转第8页)∀4∀水利经济,2010,28(3)Email:[e-mail]:#kkb.hhu.edu.cn电话/传真:[phone]h.BiQ1=A1S1=021018024016021∀31943273299731153046T=3112,,2i.w=AQ=035032018015∀3112317030363120T=311823118B10353112C110213194C120183273C130242977C140163115C150213046B20323170C210513153C220493188B30183036C310383080C320332943C330293083B40153120C410543122C4204631182,3118,,,,,,,,,,,3a.,,,,,,,b.,,,,c.,:[1],.[J].,2003(9):1924.[2].[M].:,2004:3.[3].[J].,1996(1):1220.[4],,,.[M].:,1996:5689.[5],,,.[M].:,2006:207215.[6],,.[J].,2008,24(4):5661.(:20091218:)(上接第4页)[21],,.[J].,2006,17(1):95101.[22],.[J].,2003,18(3):288293.[23],,.[J].∀,2007,17(6):6065.[24],,.[J].,2005,27(1):146152.[25].[J].,1997,15(1):4247.[26],,,.[J].,2007,28(12):28772884.[27],,,.[J].,2007,28(11):24322437.(:20091206:)∀8∀水利经济,2010,28(3)Email:[e-mail]:#kkb.hhu.edu.cn电话/传真:[phone]JournalofEconomicsofWaterResourcesVol28No3May30th2010Relevantissuesonutilizationefficiencyandevaluationmethodsforwaterresources/BAIYing,etal(CollegeofWaterScience,KeyLaboratoryforWaterandSedimentScienceofMinistryofEducation,BeijingNormalUniversity,Beijing100875,China)Abstract:Theutilizationefficiencyofwaterresourcesandthedefinitionandconnotationofitsevaluationwerediscussed.Theworldwideadvancesinrelevantissuesonutilizationefficiencyofwaterresourceswereintroduced.Thevariousevaluationmethodsfortheutilizationefficiencyofwaterresourceswerereviewedandcompared.Themainproblemsintheevaluationofutilizationefficiencyofwaterresourceswereputforward.Keywords:waterresources;utilizationefficiency;evaluationmethod;indexsystemApplicationofmultilevelgreyevaluationmethodinpostevaluationofurbanfloodcontrolprojects/LIUHong,etal(ShuyangWaterConservancyBureauofJiangsuProvince,Shuyang223600,China)Abstract:Withregardtomanyqualitativeindicesforthepostevaluationofurbanfloodcontrolprojects,themultilevelgreyevaluationmethodwasproposedtoperformthepostevaluationoftheurbanfloodcontrolprojects.Thepostevaluationindexsystemfortheurbanfloodcontrolprojectswasestablishedbyuseoftheanalytichierarchyprocess.Basedontheexperts∃grades,thewhitenweightfunctionwasadoptedtoquantitativelyhandleseriesofdisperseinformation.Eachindexwasevaluatedthroughquantitativeprocessingofitssinglevalue.Onsuchabasis,thecomprehensiveresultsofwholepostevaluationwereproposed.Keywords:urbanfloodcontrolproject;postevaluation;multilevelgreyevaluationmethod;whitenweightfunctionCalculationofwaterresourcesvalueofinterbasinwatertransferprojects/ZHENGXiongwei,etal(ZhejiangDesignInstituteofWaterConservancyandHydroelectricPower,Hangzhou310002,China)Abstract:Thewaterreceivingareasoftheinterbasinwatertransferprojectsshouldp