英文审稿意见

英文审稿意见【篇一：一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板】一些英文审稿意见的模板最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个majorrevision后接收吧。呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy.furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshowifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：ahypothesisneedstobepresented。6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?7、对研究问题的定义：trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.9、对claim,如a＞b的证明，verification:thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.10、严谨度问题：mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.11、格式（重视程度）：inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见：itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.作为审稿人，本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开（冒风险啊），但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意，就贴出来吧，当然，有关审稿人的名字，email，文章题名信息等就都删除了，以免造成不必要的麻烦！希望朋友们多评价，其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家！国人一篇文章投mater.类知名国际杂志，被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分！个人认为文章还是有一些创新的，所以作为审稿人我就给了66分，（这个分正常应该足以发表），提了一些修改意见，望作者修改后发表！登录到编辑部网页一看，一个文章竟然有六个审稿人，详细看了下打的分数，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但没有打分（另一国人审），最后一个没有回来！两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的！（括号斜体内容为我注解）reviewer4reviewerrecommendationterm:rejectoverallreviewermanuscriptrating:25commentstoeditor:reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.):prof.name:xxxaffiliation:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxmanuscriptentitledsynthesisxxx。。。。。。。。。。。ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly(seeremark1).presentationandwritingisratherpoor;thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata(forsomeseeremarks2)andevensomeflaws(seeremark3).forthesereasonsisuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.1.thepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofxxxx,but:-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofxxxxpowders(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),（通常的写作格式，审稿人实际上很在意的）-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofxxxxxxbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod(abstract,resultsanddiscussion,conclusions).（很多人不会写这个地方，大家多学习啊）2.whendiscussingxrddataxxxauthors-statethatxxxxx-statethatxxxx-thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize?（很多人用xrd，结果图放上去就什么都不管了，这是不应该的）3.whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswritexxxxxifthereissecondharmonicinexcitationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!!!（研究了什么？？？）4.英语写作要提高（这条很多人的软肋，大家努力啊）reviewer5reviewerrecommendationterm:rejectoverallreviewermanuscriptrating:n/acommentstoeditor:title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.)rof.name:（国人）affiliation:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxdeareditor:thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitledxxxx“.inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandxx