搜索
题目是Differencesbetweencountriesbecomelessevidenteachyear.Nowadays,allovertheworldpeoplesharethesamefashions,advertising,brands,eatinghabitsandTVchan-nels.Dotheadvantagesoutweighthedisadvantagesofthis?不同国家的社会文化的全球同化现象的利弊。有何应对措施?范文Itisundoubtedlythecasethattheworldtodayhasbecomeaglobalvillage.Oneoftheeffectsofthisisthatincreasinglypeopleinallcornersoftheworldareexposedtosimilarservicesandprod-uctsandadoptsimilarhabits.MyviewisthatthisislargelyabeneficialprocessandinthisessayIwillexplainwhy.Thefirstpointtomakeisthattherearesomedownsidestothisprocessofculturalglobalisation,butthesearerelativelyminor.Themostsignificantofthesedisadvantagesisthatitcanweakennationalcultureandtraditions.Forexample,ifpeoplewatchfilmsandtelevisionprogrammespro-ducedintheUnitedStates,sometimestheyadoptaspectsofthelifestyleoftheAmericancharac-terstheyseeontelevision.Typically,however,thisonlyaffectsminordetailssuchasclothinganddoesnotseriouslythreatennationalidentity.Whenweturntotheothersideoftheargument,therearetwomajorpointstomakeinfavourofthisprocess.Thefirstoftheseisthatthemorewesharehabits,productsandservices,thebetterweunderstandeachotherandthisreducesprejudiceagainstothernations.Theotherpointrelatestomodernity.Itisasignofprogressinasocietythatpeoplenolongerarerestrictedtobrandsandadvertisementsfromtheirownsocietybutareabletoaccessmoreinternationalgoods.If,forex-ample,therewereunabletodrinkCocaColaorwearNike,thenthatwouldmeantheirsocietywasnotpartoftheinternationalcommunity.Inconclusion,Iunderstandthepointofviewofpeoplewhoworryaboutculturalglobalisationbe-causeitisathreattonationaltraditions.However,thisisoutweighedbyitspositiveimpactonin-ternationalunderstandingandthefactthatitrepresentsprogresswithinasociety.题目是Unemploymentisoneofthemostseriousproblemsfacingdevelopednationstoday.Whataretheadvantagesand/ordisadvantagesofreducingtheworkingweektothirtyfivehours?失业是发达国家的一大难题。由此采取减少一周工时做法，有何利弊?9分范文：Itisunquestionablethatrisingunemploymentisoneofthemostpressingissuesintheindustrialworld.Onesolutionthathasbeenputforwardistocuttheworkingweektoamaximumof35hours.However,inmyviewthissolutionisrathercontroversialandothersolutionsneedtobefound.Itisfairlyeasytounderstandthereasonswhythisproposalhasbeenmade.Thereasoningisthatifworkersarenotallowedtoworkformorethan35hoursweekly,thenemployerswillbeforcedtoengagemorestaff.Therewouldbeatleasttwoadvantagestothis.Notonlywouldunemploymentbereduced,buttheworkingconditionsofemployeesonverylongshiftswouldalsobesignificantlyimproved.Forexample,afactoryemploying300manualworkersdoing10hoursadaymightem-ploy450workers.Thereisalso,however,astrongargumentnottoimplementthisproposal.Thisargumentisbasedoneconomiccompetitiveness.Ifacompanywasforcedtoemploymoreworkerstoproducethesameamountofgoods,thenitswagebillwouldriseanditsproductsmightbecomemoreexpen-siveandlesscompetitivecomparedtocompanieswithlongerworkingweeks.Inthiscase,itispossiblethatthecompanyeithermightbecomeinsolventoritwouldhavetomakesomeemploy-eesredundant.Asaresult,theintendedbenefittothepersonnelwouldnothappen.Insummary,wecanseethatthisisclearlyacomplexissueastherearesignificantadvantagesanddisadvantagestotheproposal.Myownpersonalviewisthatitwouldbebetternottointroducetheshortenedworkingweekbecauseitworksonlyintheoryandnotinpractice.