群体评价法在邯郸市房产投资环境评价的应用赵鹏燕

1009-6825201624-0209-022016-06-121964-1981-*056038。F293．3A。1200938．1%35．13m243．26%25．462．04%。36．21%。。19．7%60．2%。《2010—2015》。。12Aii=12…mEkk=12…nCjj=12…tCjqj=12…tq=12…sCjj=12…tCjqj=12…tq=12…s。ωkjωkjq。ek。x'ijqk=a'ijqkb'ijqkc'ijqkd'ijqk。。1．1。1．23。1．31ωkj=ωkj1ωkj2…ωkjsIAHPＲkj。2ZkjAi。ZkjAi=∑sq=1ωkjqxijqk13ωk=ωk1ωk2…ωkt1Ｒk。4ZkAi。ZkAi=∑tj=1ωkjZkjAi25ZAi。ZAi=∑nk=1ekZkAi31．4456。dλZAi=∫011－λAαL+λAαＲdα=ZAi1+ZAi21－λ+ZAi3+ZAi4λ24dλZAidλZAidλZAi。22．1櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅櫅TheresearchonpresentsituationanddevelopingtrendoftherealestateenterpriseorganizationstructureYuBiaoChenXiaonanYuGuanjianCollegeofCivilScienceandEngineeringYangzhouUniversityYangzhou225117ChinaAbstractThepresentsituationoftherealestateenterpriseorganizationstructureinourcountryisanalyzedfourkindsofcommonlyusedformofrealestateenterpriseorganizationstructureinourcountryaresummarizedthedevelopingtrendsoftherealestateenterpriseorganizationofourcountrysuchasflattrendnetworkedtrendaresummedupputforwardtheadvicesoforganizationstructure．Keywordsrealestateenterpriseorganizationstructuredevelopingtrend·902·422420168SHANXIAＲCHITECTUＲEVol．42No．24Aug．2016DOI:10.13719/j.cnki.cn14-1279/tu.2016.24.1135。33A1A2A3S107。2．21。图1评价指标体系通讯交通电、卫、气、水、暖等管网基础设施市场购买力市场竞争力资源情况经济条件信息服务生活服务文化服务金融服务社会服务距市中心距离距车站机场距离区域环境情况自然地理条件指标体系2．2．1。C41。1C4CjCjqEkA1A2A3C4C41E1E2E3E4E5778081847881828370737679808283858182858680818285757779807879818475808183717274788083868880818384727679808182848576777980C42E1E2E3E4E5808284857375767977808183767879827779818375798081727375767577788077808182787981828487889078798082828385868082848678808385C43E1E2E3E4E57275798079818284747576777579818270717477687073777475777972747576707173756568707265677074717273757072747671727375697175782．2．2Ｒ14=01－1－10－1[]110Ｒ24=01－1－10－1[]110Ｒ34=011－101[]－110Ｒ44=01－1－10－1[]－110Ｒ54=0－1110－1[]－110。2．2．3C415。C1C2C3C4。2．2．4ＲEＲE=0－1－11－1101111－101－1－1－1－10－11－1110。2．2．53ZAi。ZA1=0．83840．85760．90350．9215。ZA2=0．80250．83470．85170．9032。ZA3=0．81420．84340．85200．9035。2．2．64dλZAi。d0．5ZA1=0．8803d0．5ZA2=0．8481d0．5ZA3=0．8533。d0．5ZA1＞d0．5ZA3＞d0．5ZA2。12。3。。。1．2010—2015Ｒ．2010．2．J．20081269-270．3．FuzzyJ．200426111605-1722．4．M．200320-57．5MastasinisNikolaoFSamarasAndreasP．MCMDandprefer-enceanddisaggregationingroupdecisionsupportsystemsJ．EuropeanJournalofOpearationalＲesearch2001130414-429．6YaoJingshingWuKweimei．ＲankingFuzzynumbersbasedondecompositionprincipleandsingneddistanceJ．FuzzySetsandSystems2000116275-288．ApplicationofgroupcriteriaevaluationmethodintheevaluationofrealestateinvestmentenvironmentinHandanCityZhaoPengyanWuChao*HebeiUniversityofEngineeringHandan056038ChinaAbstractThroughinvestigatingrealestateinvestmentenvironmentofdifferentregionsofHandanCitythepaperappliesfuzzygroupcriteriae-valuationmethodanalyzesandassessesrealestateinvestmentenvironmentofdifferentregionsofHandanCitybycombiningwithactualinvest-mentenvironmentevaluationcaseswhichhasprovidedsomeguidanceforrealestateinvestors．Keywordsrealestateinvestmentenvironmentgroupcriteriaevaluationindicators·012·422420168