城市房屋拆迁补偿问题研究

三峡大学硕士学位论文城市房屋拆迁补偿问题研究姓名：刘纳兵申请学位级别：硕士专业：管理科学与工程指导教师：袁大祥20081101IIIIIAbstractInrecentyears,withChineserapideconomicdevelopment,theaccelerationoftheprocessofurbantransformationbeingboosted,urbanhousingdemolitionenteresarapiddevelopmentstage.Urbanhousingdemolitiondevelopswithurbandevelopmentandconstruction.Urbanhousingdemolitionisbeneficialtoreasonableutilizationoflandresources,theimprovementofthepeople'slivingquality,theimprovementofurbanecologicalenvironment,thedevelopmentofcityeconomy.However,becauserelativelegalsystemisnotperfect,removebehaviorofgovernmentisnotstandardized,socialsecuritysystemisnotperfect,anddemolitioncompensationisnon-market-orientation,therearemanydisputesintheurbanhousingdemolition.Thekeytothequestionisthecoreproblemofhousedemolition----compensation.theworkofcompensationofurbanhousingdemolitionisaenormoussystemproject,involvinginlegislation,judicature,administration,marketassessment,andsoon.Thesuccessorfailureofcompensationhasstrongrelationwiththeurbanplanningstrategyandbecomesafocusofthegovernmentandthecitizen.Therefore,Ichoosethesubjectofthecompensationofurbanhousingdemolition.Herethearticlebelowdevotes5mainpartstotheresearchofthehousedemolitioncompensationsystem.Thefirstpartmainlyfocusesonselectedtopicbackground,theresearchsignificance,thepresentresearchstatusathomeandabroad,majorcontentsoftheresearch.Thesecondpartstudiesontheoriesofcompensationproblemofurbanhousingdemolitionfromlandrenttheory,landpricetheory,gametheory.Thethirdpartarguessomeproblemsandanalysisesonreasonsofproblems.Thefourthpartputsforwardserializationofsuggestionfromthelawangle,theadministrativeview,thesocialperspective,andthemarketangle.Thefinalpartsummarizesandpredictesonthepaper.Keywords:demolitioncompensatelawadministrativesocialmarketI1“”211.11.1.1“”03080408070820078242001—1.1.2“”31.21.2.1AmericanConstitutionEminentDomainLaw[1]PropertyLaw[2]1.1[3][4][5][6][7]4PublicHearing1.1EminentDomainLawCounter-offer3051.2.21[8]2007[9]20065[10]2004[11]2[12][13][14][15]1621.31.3.1071011231.3.2722.12.1.1[16][17]12.1[18]2.120%5010160606060100501023060601207060501041560602401901802.2[18]82.220%/km1201050409018108108021010502070148410824351050106012721083622.3[18]2.350101606060601005010230606012070605010302.1.2200192.2=/2.4.[19]MPM1K2K3K1P1L11P12P13P14P15P16P17P2P2L4K5K6K7K8K9K3P3L4PF(T)20011234123111213141516174567893ΜPΜKKKF(T)KKKKKKPPPPPPPPPPPP=()()()=×××××××++++++××××××××102.41L11L12L13L14L2L21L22L23L24L3L31L32L4L2.32.3.1[20](GameTheory)(payofffunction)2.3.2200111[21]2.12.112P1P2[P1P2]Q1Q2[Q1Q2]P1P2P1Q1P2Q2P2Q2Q2:P2Q2(P1P2P2.2Q1Q21333.13.1.13151615161991200120071014214151642[22]42[23][24]3.13.1153.1.2163200581200581116[25]537[26]3.237222237928334163.237,,,2214122153522985165151215306303516913612795334200581()173.2[27]3.2.120021100/1600/1600/2600/[26]3.2.21820033[26]3.2.320056308[9]3.3200[28]()3.3[29]1920072[30]0741451663.3166230101016334516555663.43.4.1:20[31]3.43.4(l)(2)(3)(4)(l)(2)():(3)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)12107126/12/9[32]222[33]2007101484[34]3.13.2(3.3)[35]3.10%10%20%30%40%50%233.33.20%10%20%30%40%50%243.4.2=(K+)+K[36]07840408420023.42002253.4.33.520033.42008-4-32002195,20021953.5261[37]300/52[38]27[39][40]2844.14.1.1::[41]4.14.13549()()()()()()()()()2914.1[42]()()()()()[43]2[44]1:212...n3124.130[45]4.1.2[46]200431:::[47]31[48]4.1.34.2[49]32[50]4.24.2.1[51][52][53]4.233[54]4.2.2[55]1[56]2200431345[57]344.34.3.120074.3[58]08380%20%1050/400200780050060100171[59]20%80%4.335[60]1)2)3)[61]44.44.4364.3.2[62]423:200781030:[63]5%[64]4.2374.212345674.2:13024.3[65]384.34.4[66][67]4.4.1[68]4.4.1.114.439200737:)20060.51.51.3[69]4.4200432[70]705040504.4.1.2403.41()[71]23456[72]4.4.2[73]1()()[74]412[75]2924.4.3[76]1[77]2[78]42[79]3343[80]4455.1—0710112342001—455.246[1].—Kelov.CityofNewLondon[J].,2007,2:489~492[2]RichardL.Stroup.TheEconomicsofCompensatingPropertyOwners[J].ContemporaryEconomicPolicy,1997,4:55~56[3].[J].,2005,15:33[4]WoohyungLee,TohruNaito.CompensationRulesandInvestmentunderLand-Taking[J].ReviewofUrbanandDevelopmentStudies,2002,1:78~82[5]EdwardG.Goetz.ThePoliticsofPovertyDeconcentrationandHousingDemolition[J].JournalofUrban,2000,2:157~159[6]MaartenC.W.JanssenChristianGerthLonnekeJansenMarinkaNiehoff.ThePriceofLandandTheProcessofExpropriation[J].DeEcomomist,1996,1:63~65[7]RoderickDuncan.Priceorpolitics?Aninvestigationofthecausesofexpropriation[J].ustralianJournalofAgriculturalandResourceEconomics,2006,1:85~90[8].[J].,20082:81~85[9].[M].:,2007.2:20-24[10].[M].:,2006.1:60-72[11].[M].:,2004.8:2-3[12].[J].,2008,1:76~78[13],.[J].,20076:25~28[14].[J].20063:70~73[15].[J].,2006,5:78~82[16].[M].:,2005.8:88-89[17],.[M].:,2004.8:173-176[18].[M].:,2006:25-26[19].[M].:,2002:49-5247[20].[M].:,2002:5-6[21].[J].,2005,2:38~41[22].—[J].,2007,2:135[23].—[J].,2008,5:17[24].—[J].,2007,8:27~28[25].[J].,2007,7:99~100[26].[M].:,2003.11:2098[27].[J].20081:88[28].:[J].,2007,28:22[29].[J].,2001,12:44[30].[J].,2007,8:86[31].[J].,1998,3:40[32].[J].,2005,9:27~28[33].[J].,2007,1:33[34].[J].,2005,10:48~49[35],,.[J].,2005,3:127[36],,.[M].:2003:263[37],.[J].,