我国地方政府绩效评估初探

华中科技大学硕士学位论文我国地方政府绩效评估初探姓名：卢洁申请学位级别：硕士专业：工商管理指导教师：杨宏进20081023I208090IIAbstractPerformancereferstotheactofworkandactivitiesofthemainachievementsorpositiveresults.PerformanceManagementwasfirstusedinenterprises.Sincethe1980s,ithasbeenwidelyintroducedintogovernmentadministration.Performancemanagementisthemanagementofgovernmentfromenterprisemanagementandeffectiveformofaproduct.GovernmentPerformanceAssessmentisthecoreofperformancemanagement.Itistoimprovetheeffectivenessofgovernmentmanagementandenhancethequalityofgovernmentservices,apowerfultool.GovernmentPerformanceAssessmentisnotonlyconducivetopublicscrutiny,andconducivetogovernmentdepartmentstoimprovethetargetedmeasuresinordertopromoteadministrativeefficiencyandthegovernmenttoimprovetheproductivity.Inthelate90s,theideaofperformanceevaluationaftertheintroductionofourcountry,thatiscausedbythegovernmentdepartmentsatalllevels.Inrecentyears,China'sassessmentoftheperformanceofgovernmentdepartmentshavemadegreatachievements,buttherearestillthemainassessmentofasingle,imperfectevaluationsystem,thelawdoesnotsoundalotless,andsoon.Firstofall,thispaperdescribedtheperformanceevaluationofthebackgroundresearchandtheory,ananalysisofgovernmentperformanceinourassessmentoftheneedtoimplement;followedbytheGovernmenttoassesstheperformance-basedresearch,analyzingtheperformanceoflocalgovernmentstoassessthecurrentsituationandexistingproblems;andthen,Introducedaforeigngovernmenttoassesstheperformanceofourexperienceandtheactualsituationbothathomeandabroadandcomparativeassessmentoftheenvironmentalperformanceofthesimilaritiesanddifferencesonhowtolearnfromadvancedforeignexperiencetoexplorethepreliminary;Finally,combinedwithgovernmentperformanceevaluationsystemimplementedinpracticalexperienceinNanhaiDistrictofFoshanCity,usingempiricalanalysis,analyzedthestrengthsandweaknessesoftheGovernmentPerformanceEvaluationSysteminNanhaiDistrict,andputforwardourgovernmenttopromoteaneffectiveperformanceevaluationcarriedoutbyanumberofrecommendations:Mustbeadheretobasedontheconceptofscientificdevelopmenttoguide,public-oriented,AdheretotheprincipleoftheopennessandIIItransparency,Emphasisonbothefficiencyandfairness.Introduceprofessionalassessmentandresearchinstitutions;strengthentheperformanceassessmentofthetheoreticalresearch,strengthentheinstitutionalizationandtheLegalizationoftheassessment.Usemethodsofthecombinationoftheregionasawhole,thecombinationofgeneralandspecial,thecombinationofqualitativeandquantitative,establishascientificassessmentoftheperformanceofthesystem.Strengthenfeedbackandapplicationoftheresultsoftheassessment.Integritythemonitoringmechanism,ensurethefairnessandauthorityoftheperformanceresults.KeyWords:LocalgovernmentPerformancemanagementPerformanceEvaluation“”111.12030-40702070-80[1]208090[2]3Eeconomyefficiencyeffectiveness[3]221208080“”“”“”“”“”200531.21887[4]1900[5][6][7]20203019394042060“”[8][8][9]2080Pollitt1990(Hood1991)FanandRosenbloom1992Barzelay1992DsbornandGaebler1992[10]5207080[11]20901990Norton20069[12][13]333[14][15]666[16][17]61.3“”7“”“”81.41231234591-11022.1194919641979[18]12311GDP452.2208012080MBO1990128019982390%1002121991199461996719985200122004132003200420042004819991019981999“”3198919992320042394901999142001200415200492004200514392.3115[19]23164[20][20]5“”“”GDP619987171833.120802090“”“”3.1.1112345[21]useofresourcesserviceassessmentcorporateassessment45419[22]2[23]320[24]3.1.21“”23EEconomicEfficiencyEffectivenessEquity4E213E4E4E343.2122234GDP3.31123804232123419922452544.114-1XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX4-1267210010010010032714-14-1X87060706030%30%40%5020505072072010284.24.2.11234360529674.2.218721%40%8.4%23430GDP48454.34.3.11312GDPGDPGDP3324567“”“”83394.3.21342197619813619933520043136()23603334-2371004-2[25]GDPGDPGDPGDP33200482GDP3841998395406784142554344[1]()·.:.:,2002:9[2]()·.——.:,2005:49[3].——“”.:,2008:2[4]WoodrowWilson.theStudyofAdministration.PoliticalScienceQuarterly,June1887,2:1[5]FrederickW.Taylor.TestimonybeforetheU.S..HouseofRepresentatives,January25,1912[6]MaxWeber.EssaysinSociology.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,1946[7]HenriFayol.AdministrationIndustrielleEt.Generale.BordasParis,1981:3-13[8]()·...:,2003:88,101-103[9]H.GeorgeFrederickson.NewPublicAdministration.UniversityofAlabamaPress,1980[10]·E·..:,2001:61[11]..,2006,4:19-21[12].——.,1995,5:38-41[13]..,2004,3:6-11[14]..,2005,5:21[15]..,2005,8:4-6[16],..,2005,1:84-9545[17]..,2006,3:18-21[18]..,2006,5:11-16[19]..,2005.7.8[20],.:.:[21]..,2003,6:93-95[22]..,2007,2:61-67[23],..,2006,3():231[24],,()..,2006,4:12-15[25]33.,2004.8.2[26]..,2007,4:92-98[27]..,2006,12:69-72[28]..,2007,7:79-81[29]..,2005,3:62-66[30]..,2008,1:55-60[31]..,2007,19[32]..,2006,9:34-36[33],..,2004,1:13-17[34],..,2006,7:30-32[35]..,2005,9:26-2946[36]..,2006,3:38-40[37]L.Gulick&L.Urwick,eds.PapersontheScienceofAdministration.NewYork:InstituteofPublicAdministration,1937:13-131[38]Al.Go.FromRedTapetoResults:CreatingaGovernmentThatWorksBetterandCostsLess.WashingtonDC:U.S.SuperintendentofDocuments,1993:1[39]OECD.MeasuringtheNon-observedEconomy:AHandBook.OECDPublicat