科研机构学科带头人绩效考核办法与实践

2820073ScienceResearchManagementVo.l28,ZKMar,2007:2006-10-30.:(1962-),,,,::1000-2995(2007)ZK-005-0121卢振举(中国科学院大连化学物理研究所,辽宁大连116023):根据相关绩效管理理论,首先探讨科研机构中学科带头人绩效考核的原则和主要指标;其次根据主要考核指标和实际情况,采用定性和定量相结合的办法从科研业绩管理能力和发展前景三类指标建立了对学科带头人评价考核的多维模型;然后,通过使用考核模型从投入产出时间实力声誉和士气等细化因素对具体实例进行了实践检验,收到了良好的效果,从而指导进行了对学科带头人的年度考核评价工作;最后,提出了指导今后绩效考核评价工作的建议:学科带头人;绩效考核;指标体系;评价模型:F272:A引言,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,[1],,,,,,,1999,,,,,,1绩效考核原则和理论,:1,!122!20072,,,,3,,,,[2],,[3];(AnalyticHierarchyProcess,AHP)[4],,,360,(KPI),,[5-6]20,,,,:,,,:,,,,,,,,,A!H!∀#∀#,∀#∃∃∃,∀#∀#,,∀#,∃(),∀#X∃∃∃Y!∀Z#,,,,,,,,2考核指标体系的模型:,,:,,,;;:%();&;%;&;∋;(();%;&(:!123!),,,A,:A=)8i=1Ai,A:,Ai::(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)3实例验证,,,,111703.0040.0037.590.002.000.000.623.005.0001791.212542.75406.3341.399.0019.0030.0023.698.0011.1401091.293389.75255.300.000.0017.000.0015.553.0018.19-2696.784153.07173.2211.243.0039.000.0061.479.0057.620507.62598.47142.341.180.0010.0020.0044.6010.0042.460369.056112.88160.0021.140.000.000.0049.915.006.280355.20731.20176.7634.983.0069.000.0015.843.008.780342.56824.25177.035.520.0065.0029.0016.763.003.000323.57954.60133.0648.953.0010.008.0035.637.004.780305.021058.25181.5216.270.0022.000.003.670.005.430287.1311100.4790.313.330.0036.000.0017.283.0031.770282.151260.8072.4849.713.0015.000.0042.2112.005.780260.991370.00122.007.573.0029.000.0012.120.001.190244.881414.15141.849.773.0035.000.0016.713.002.000226.971582.5828.4023.009.000.000.0059.3911.002.890216.26!124!200716127.4528.0220.053.0010.000.0024.270.001.240214.031741.5080.1116.220.0029.000.0022.015.000.94-2192.791813.00119.048.490.0030.000.008.983.000.990183.511958.082.004.406.007.000.0064.813.0025.340170.632092.5055.372.470.008.000.000.420.001.000159.762165.0064.702.870.0016.000.009.670.001.000159.242239.4064.994.890.0018.000.0015.510.009.570152.362367.4740.151.313.005.0020.0012.080.001.600150.612440.3050.407.360.0027.000.0022.910.002.000149.972527.509.202.133.0083.000.0013.610.009.710148.152611.4571.7811.913.0015.000.005.963.003.000125.102736.0037.870.853.0035.000.0011.460.000.000124.182829.0134.981.043.0018.000.0022.046.000.000114.062976.680.002.863.0011.000.008.840.000.000102.373076.480.000.323.000.000.000.000.0016.79096.58312.6456.3812.170.005.000.0018.210.000.00094.38324.8069.2011.540.002.000.006.200.000.00093.743379.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00079.003427.700.000.390.002.000.0025.764.0018.00077.85357.6039.962.003.002.000.0018.110.000.60073.27362.2512.270.003.0039.000.007.186.001.22070.92370.0018.6612.330.0014.000.0019.846.000.00070.823833.5516.007.630.0010.000.002.990.000.00070.173935.501.2410.783.000.000.0013.470.005.78069.77400.0014.034.493.0018.0020.004.982.000.00066.504151.270.006.830.000.000.000.000.000.00058.10420.0029.322.830.0012.000.0013.460.000.00057.624335.103.000.550.005.000.003.480.002.00049.124445.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00045.00450.0033.632.493.002.000.003.390.000.00044.51460.0033.031.480.005.000.001.470.001.14042.114734.004.401.330.000.000.000.000.000.00039.73485.0028.102.610.000.000.002.020.001.00038.724919.000.0010.250.002.000.002.450.003.00036.71500.0020.002.560.000.000.009.580.000.00032.13513.451.140.283.002.000.004.060.000.00013.93:!125!4结论与建议1,,,,2,3,,4,5;;;;;6,,::[1].[J].:,2004(6):61-63.[2][EB/OL].=1119&cid=47.[3].[J]..1996(6):34-38.[4],,.[J]..2000(4):217-219.[5][EB/OL].[6]KPI-[EB/OL].(DalianInstituteofChemicalPhysics,ChineseAcademyofSciences,Dalian116023,China)Abstract:Accordingtotherelatedachivementmanagementtheories,theprinciplesandmajorindexesofachivementevaluationforleadersofafieldoflearninginscientificresearchinstituteareinquiredinto.Thenbasedonevaluationindexesandactualsituation,thequalitativemethodiscombinedwithquantitativemethod.Startwiththethreekindsofindex,thatis,researchaccomplishment,managementability,anddevelopmentprospect,amulti-dimensionmodelforevaluationofleadersofafieldoflearningisbuilt.Usingthemode,lfromthefinefactors,thatconsistofdevotion,output,time,realstrenght,goodreputationandmorale,theactualcaseistestifiedandthegoodresultisrecieved.Thereforethemodelisusedforinstructingtheannualassessmentfortheleaders.Finally,thesuggestionsforthefutureachivementevaluationareformed.Keywords:leaderofafieldoflearning;achivementevaluation;indexsystem;evaluatemodel