了解演讲稿范文文体

参考资料，少熬夜！了解演讲稿范文文体【前言导读】刀客网友为您整理编辑的“了解演讲稿范文文体”精选优质范文，供您参考学习，希望对您有所帮助，喜欢就下载支持呢！了解中国的崛起演讲稿1theworldischangingwithreallyremarkablespeed.ifyoulookatthechartatthetophere,you'llseethatin2025,thesegoldmansachsprojectionssuggestthatthechineseeconomywillbealmostthesamesizeastheamericaneconomy.andifyoulookatthechartfor2050,it'sprojectedthatthechineseeconomywillbetwicethesizeoftheamericaneconomy,andtheindianeconomywillbealmostthesamesizeastheamericaneconomy.andweshouldbearinmindherethattheseprojectionsweredrawnupbeforethewesternfinancialcrisis.acoupleofweeksago,iwaslookingatthelatestprojectionbybnpparibasforwhenchinawillhavealargereconomythantheunitedstates.goldmansachsprojected2027.thepost-crisisprojectionis20xx.that'sjustadecadeaway.chinaisgoingtochangetheworldintwofundamentalrespects.firstofall,it'sahugedevelopingcountrywithapopulationofbillionpeople,whichhasbeengrowingforover30yearsataround10percentayear.andwithinadecade,itwillhavethelargesteconomyintheworld.neverbeforeinthemodernerahasthelargesteconomyintheworldbeenthatofadevelopingcountry,ratherthanadevelopedcountry.secondly,forthefirsttimeinthemodernera,thedominantcountryintheworld--whichithinkiswhatchinawillbecome--willbenotfromthewestandfromvery,verydifferentcivilizationalroots.nowiknowit'sawidespreadassumptioninthewestthat,ascountriesmodernize,theyalsowesternize.thisisanillusion.it'sanassumptionthatmodernityisaproductsimplyofcompetition,marketsandtechnology.itisnot;itisalsoshapedequallybyhistoryandculture.参考资料，少熬夜！chinaisnotlikethewest,anditwillnotbecomelikethewest.itwillremaininveryfundamentalrespectsverydifferent.nowthebigquestionhereisobviously,howdowemakesenseofchina?howdowetrytounderstandwhatchinais?andtheproblemwehaveinthewestatthemomentby-and-largeisthattheconventionalapproachisthatweunderstanditreallyinwesternterms,usingwesternideas.wecan't.nowiwanttoofferyouthreebuildingblocksfortryingtounderstandwhatchinaislike--justasabeginning.nowwhatisextraordinaryaboutthisis,whatgiveschinait'ssenseofbeingchina,whatgivesthechinesethesenseofwhatitistobechinese,comesnotfromthelasthundredyears,notfromthenationstateperiod,whichiswhathappenedinthewest,butfromtheperiod,ifyoulike,ofthecivilizationstate.i'mthinkinghere,forexample,ofcustomslikeancestralworship,ofaverydistinctivenotionofthestate,likewise,averydistinctivenotionofthefamily,socialrelationshipslikeguanxi,confucianvaluesandsoon.theseareallthingsthatcomefromtheperiodofthecivilizationstate.inotherwords,china,unlikethewesternstatesandmostcountriesintheworld,isshapedbyitssenseofcivilization,itsexistenceasacivilizationstate,ratherthanasanationstate.andthere'soneotherthingtoaddtothis,andthatisthis:ofcourseweknowchina'sbig,huge,demographicallyandgeographically,withapopulationofbillionpeople.whatweoftenaren'treallyawareofisthefactthatchinaisextremelydiverseandverypluralistic,andinmanywaysverydecentralized.youcan'trunaplaceonthisscalesimplyfrombeijing,eventhoughwethinkthistobethecase.it'sneverbeenthecase.sothisischina,acivilizationstate,ratherthananationstate.andwhatdoesitmean?wellithinkithasallsortsofprofoundimplications.i'llgiveyoutwoquickones.thefirstisthatthemostimportantpoliticalvalueforthechineseisunity,isthemaintenanceofchinesecivilization.youknow,2,000yearsago,europe:breakdown,thefragmentationoftheholyromanempire[roman参考资料，少熬夜！empire].itdivided,andit'sremaineddividedeversince.china,overthesametimeperiod,wentinexactlytheoppositedirection,verypainfullyholdingthishugecivilization,civilizationstatetogether.thesecondismaybemoreprosaic,whichishongkong.doyourememberthehandoverofhongkongbybritaintochinain1997?youmayrememberwhatthechineseconstitutionalpropositionwas.onecountry,twosystems.andi'lllayawagerthatbarelyanyoneinthewestbelievedthem.windowdressing.whenchinagetsit'shandsonhongkong,thatwon'tbethecase.13yearson,thepoliticalandlegalsysteminhongkongisasdifferentnowasitwasin1997.wewerewrong.whywerewewrong?wewerewrongbecausewethought,naturallyenough,innationstateways.thinkofgermanunification,1990.whathappened?well,basicallytheeastwasswallowedbythewest.onenation,onesystem.thatisthenationstatementality.butyoucan'trunacountrylikechina,acivilizationstate,onthebasisofonecivilization,onesystem.itdoesn'twork.soactuallytheresponseofchinatothequestionofhongkong--asitwillbetothequestionoftaiwan--wasanaturalresponse:onecivilization,manysystems.nowthegreatadvantageofthishistoricalexperiencehasbeenthat,withoutthehan,chinacouldneverhaveheldtogether.thehanidentityhasbeenthecementwhichhasheldthiscountrytogether.thegreatdisadvantageofitisthatthehanhaveaveryweakconceptionofculturaldifference.theyreallybelieveintheirownsuperiority,andtheyaredisrespectfulofthosewhoarenot.hencetheirattitude,forexample,totheuyghursandtothetibetans.orletmegiveyoumythirdbuildingblock,thechinesestate.nowtherelationshipbetweenthestateandsocietyinchinaisverydifferentfromthatinthewest.nowweinthewestoverwhelminglyseemtothink--inthesedaysatleast--thattheauthorityandlegitimacyofthestateisafunctionofdemocracy.theproblemwiththispropositionisthatthechinesestateenjoysmo